Re: [Hawkular-dev] Logging ...
> Am 28.01.2015 um 12:57 schrieb Lucas Ponce
<lponce(a)redhat.com>:
> Also, this point can be discussed later, but is there any convention for
> debug, like this one:
>
> if (LOG.isDebugEnabled()) {
> LOG.debug("Message received: [{}]", msg);
> }
>
> I mean, I like to use DEBUG for verbosity, but to reduce performance
> penalty, we can discuss a common approach.
Isn't that relatively common usage anyway?
Seriously - if some code has dozens of ifDebugEnabled() calls, it may make
a lot of sense to factor that out to the start of the method or even in to
the constructor
so that this goes if (isDebug) ... { log.debug() }
+1
Or do you mean the usage of the ugly uppercase LOG variable :-)?
I don't have any preference ussing log, _log, LOG, or whatever :-) just asking what is
the preferred nomenclature, or if these things are in some doc that probably I missed.
Thx.
_______________________________________________
hawkular-dev mailing list
hawkular-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/hawkular-dev