Re: [Hawkular-dev] Hawkular integration
On 05/21/2015 04:02 PM, Matthew Wringe wrote:
Yeah, I was under the impression that metrics needs to be handled in
a special manner since we need to run it differently in OpenShift. Which means when we
also add in Alerting to OpenShift, it will also need to be handled in a special manner.
But I guess we can figure that part out when we actually need to add in Alerting.
Yes we'll likely want a Metrics+Alerts (and maybe replace Metrics only
as we can't afford to QE many combinations) for OpenShift purpose.
I think the discussion was also thinking about doing things in a
modular manner, where we could have the different components running as individual
containers in kubernetes, and then spin up (or down) more containers as needed. But it
looks like the decision is to not to go with that approach for scaling the main Hawkular
server.
Right this is not a requirement, we also voted for a zip distribution at
the f2f (not a set of docker containers).
Thomas
----- Original Message -----
> From: "Heiko W.Rupp" <hrupp(a)redhat.com>
> To: "Discussions around Hawkular development"
<hawkular-dev(a)lists.jboss.org>
> Sent: Thursday, May 21, 2015 9:27:19 AM
> Subject: Re: [Hawkular-dev] Hawkular integration
>
> On 21 May 2015, at 13:50, Michael Burman wrote:
>
>> it's a good combo to keep those two as "standalone", as there are
>> other alerting components available also (such as Bosun) - which we
>> would probably like to 'compete' with.
>
> Question is though how much we need to take care of this now and not
> address it when we need it.
> _______________________________________________
> hawkular-dev mailing list
> hawkular-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
> https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/hawkular-dev
>
_______________________________________________
hawkular-dev mailing list
hawkular-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/hawkular-dev