Re: [Hawkular-dev] Should Keycloak integration be optional?
Several questions:
Does keycloak support other auth mechanisms that don't build on http?
Does keycloak limit the reuse of hawkular components?
Does keycloak have a desirable out-of-the-box experience? (Read addtional setup costs)
Am 04.02.2015 um 14:10 schrieb Thomas Segismont
<tsegismo(a)redhat.com>:
Le 30/01/2015 12:22, Thomas Heute a écrit :
>> When you install InfluxDB, carbon/whisper, opentsdb, you don't need to
>> install an identity management server, period.
>
> They are also not multi-tenant solutions AFAIK. I don't see Metrics
> competing with the solution mentioned, actually we looked into those to
> use as underlying solution.
>
To me, it doesn't matter if the team doesn't put all its efforts in
maintaining a standalone metrics distribution. But it does matter to
enable and help re-use outside of our principal use case (the hawkular
suite), because we'd miss important feedback/bug reports/contributions
from the community.
_______________________________________________
hawkular-dev mailing list
hawkular-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/hawkular-dev