I'm fairly sure the Agent already has a "name" tag or something
similar. We definitely need a convention for this, if not an actual
requirement. The metricName is way too tedious, our use of tags should
work towards Prometheus's use of labels.
On 8/9/2017 5:27 AM, Thomas Heute wrote:
We definitely need to solve that usability issue, I definitely
experienced it in Grafana.
For Grafana in particular, I know Prometheus driver has a "label name"
that is defined in Grafana and can be templatized with metrics labels.
It's purely on Grafana side and only works for Grafana.
Having a convention is a quick solution, do we see it used by Metrics
internals or only by agents and UIs ? Does it need to support
templating with other tags or do we expect the client to be smarter to
tags value change ?
I would also suggest displayName (or display_name or else) rather than
just name, I think it's clearer that it's for UI and can change.
On Wed, Aug 9, 2017 at 10:53 AM, Heiko Rupp <hrupp(a)redhat.com
<mailto:hrupp@redhat.com>> wrote:
On 9 Aug 2017, at 8:41, Joel Takvorian wrote:
> What would you say about having a convention of a special tag (let's
> say "_name") that would point to a (short) intelligible name for a
> metric. That convention wouldn't be mandatory in any case of course,
> but the UI could check if that tag exists and use that name, instead
> of the full metric id, for better display.
Makes sense to me.
We had a displayName in RHQ.
_______________________________________________
hawkular-dev mailing list
hawkular-dev(a)lists.jboss.org <mailto:hawkular-dev@lists.jboss.org>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/hawkular-dev
<
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/hawkular-dev>
_______________________________________________
hawkular-dev mailing list
hawkular-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/hawkular-dev