We use JMS in large part because metrics and alerts are in separate WARs (I realize JMS
is used for other purposes, but I am speaking strictly about this scenario). Why not
deploy metrics and alerts in the same WAR and altogether bypass JMS? As data points are
ingested, we broadcast them using an Rx subject to which both metrics and alerts
subscribe. We could do this is in away that still keeps metrics and alerts decoupled as
they are today. We would also have the added benefit of having a stand alone deployment
for metrics and alerts.
On Aug 10, 2016, at 9:37 AM, Jay Shaughnessy
<jshaughn(a)redhat.com> wrote:
Yes, in fact I should have made it more clear that this whole discussion is bounded by H
Metrics and H Alerting in the H Services context, so limiting this to HS/Bus integration
code is what we'd want to do.
On 8/10/2016 4:06 AM, Heiko W.Rupp wrote:
> Someone remind me please.
>
> That bus-sender in/or hawkular-metrics is not an
> internal detail of metrics, but rather sort of
> 'external add-on'?
>
> If so, the logic to filter (or create many subscriptions)
> could go into it and would not touch the core metrics.
> Metrics would (as it does today) forward all new data-
> points into this sender and the sender can then decide
> how to proceed.
>
> _______________________________________________
> hawkular-dev mailing list
> hawkular-dev(a)lists.jboss.org <mailto:hawkular-dev@lists.jboss.org>
>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/hawkular-dev
<
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/hawkular-dev>
>
_______________________________________________
hawkular-dev mailing list
hawkular-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/hawkular-dev