Re: [Hawkular-dev] Hawkular.org
On 16 Jun 2016, at 15:33, Stefan Negrea wrote:
On Thu, Jun 16, 2016 at 2:20 AM, Gary Brown <gbrown(a)redhat.com>
wrote:
> I think the structure is ok, but prefer having Downloads and Documentation
> at the top level. But instead of the previous structure, still organise
> based on package, so:
>
There is no point having top level Downloads and Documentation if
everything is sectioned the way Thomas proposed in the last email. There
And then as user having to navigate separate trees to get e.g. to the
downloads section of hawkular-services and the Go client is also confusing.
Personally I'd like to see one top level of downloads or even downloads+docs
| Project | Docs | Download latest
|-----------------|-----------|---------------|
| hawkular-services | docs/hs/.. | v0.0.5 |
| go client | docs/go/.. | v 0.0.3 |
With docs + downloads being hyperlinked
Individual subtrees could even link to this table for their
downloads (but directly link to the target docs)