On 10.05.2016 17:46, Anton wrote:
On Tue, May 10, 2016 at 5:31 PM, Juraci Paixão Kröhling
<jpkroehling(a)redhat.com <mailto:jpkroehling@redhat.com>> wrote:
Nothing prevents Hawkular from shipping with Keycloak (server and/or
adapter), as recent versions of Keycloak can protect any WAR deployments
transparently, via the Keycloak Adapter Subsystem for Wildfly. This can
be done by the community if interest in that integration exists but I
currently have no plans on working on that.
I really hope this is included. I can appreciate you want to remove
dependencies, but Keycloak is extremely useful, and I had come to expect
- falsely - that jboss/redhat products would provide easy or OOTB
support for something so fundamental as Keycloak.
"Easy" is subjective, but I'd say that it's still easy to have Keycloak
protecting Hawkular: it's just a matter of installing the Keycloak
Adapter and adding the <secure-deployment> sections to the standalone.xml :
https://git.io/vrU8h
Note that we did ship Keycloak server on the same Wildfly instance as
Hawkular, but that was never a recommended approach other than for
development purposes. So, one could argue that it's easier to do a
proper Keycloak integration now than it was before :)
- Juca.