This sounds interesting as it would also be
something like our computed resource state
with some simple form of "alerting" behind it.
Forwarded message:
From: David M. Lloyd <david.lloyd(a)redhat.com>
To: wildfly-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
Subject: Re: [wildfly-dev] Wildfly start-up as service script depends
on console log to determinate start result
Date: Fri, 12 Jun 2015 07:57:25 -0500
This is yet another good use case for an idea I proposed at the last
couple developer meeting: the idea of configurable "availability"
services, where you add a configuration which says "when these
components and/or configured services are available, perform this
action" where the action might be to notify a load balancer, perform a
notification to humans, or even drop a file to the filesystem (which
would be directly useful to this use case).
Note (in case someone thinks this is a great idea and runs out to
implement it right away) that when I say "configured services" I do
not
mean MSC service names; more like management capabilities where you
have
a constrained namespace and each subsystem can contribute services to
this category.
Also note that Java 9 adds limited support for signalling unrelated
processes, though at the moment on UNIX the signals are basically
limited to TERM and KILL.
On 06/12/2015 07:06 AM, Jason T. Greene wrote:
>
>> On Jun 10, 2015, at 11:46 AM, Brian Stansberry
>> <brian.stansberry(a)redhat.com> wrote:
>>
>> So, what purpose is this fulfilling?
>>
>> 2) How does other software solve this problem? If it's solving a
>> valid
>> problem, it seems like there would be a typical solution.
>
> The classic UNIX solution is that the daemon forks and returns,
> dropping a PID file of its child to disk, after it is done
> initializing and exits with an error code when there is a problem.
>
> Systemd added other approaches, where a daemon can signal systemd
> directly, or it can use dbus to send a message.
>
> The former can't be done efficiently in Java because it doesn't have
> a pure fork(), only an exec. Although it would be possible to emulate
> with an exec with an unacceptable hit to boot time. The latter
> options are too Linux specific.
>
> I think the best solution would be for us to add a signaling
> mechanism specifically for this purpose. We could use sun.misc.Signal
> (potentially an issue on Java 9), or we could exec the kill command
> to signal a process.
>
> We could also use a specially status file (e.g standalone.sh
> --start-status-file=blah) for a script to monitor.
>
> Thoughts?
> _______________________________________________
> wildfly-dev mailing list
> wildfly-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/wildfly-dev
>
--
- DML
_______________________________________________
wildfly-dev mailing list
wildfly-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/wildfly-dev