Gary, I don't have any strong opinions about increasing the heap size. We had a similar problem in the main Hawkular dist, however. We fixed it this way: https://git.io/vgbQ5 Note that this is not in the feature-pack, but in the place where a dist is built. - Juca. On 17.02.2016 12:56, Gary Brown wrote: > Does anyone have any issue with the heap size being increased to: -Xms256m > -Xmx2048m > > When Elasticsearch has a reasonable amount of data it needs more memory. > > Next question is how best to modify this in standalone.conf from a feature > pack - any suggestions appreciated. My only thought was extract from > wildfly, modify and then store the modified version in btm feature pack - > so assumes alignment of wildfly version with hawkular. > > Regards > Gary > _______________________________________________ > hawkular-dev mailing list > hawkular-dev(a)lists.jboss.org > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/hawkular-dev > _______________________________________________ hawkular-dev mailing list hawkular-dev(a)lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/hawkular-dev