April 2016 - infinispan-issues - Jboss List Archives

[JBoss JIRA] (ISPN-6485) JGroupsTransport.lambda$invokeRemotelyAsync$1 seems to trigger resizes of HashMap

by Tristan Tarrant (JIRA)

[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/ISPN-6485?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.... ] Tristan Tarrant reassigned ISPN-6485: ------------------------------------- Assignee: Dan Berindei > JGroupsTransport.lambda$invokeRemotelyAsync$1 seems to trigger resizes of HashMap > --------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: ISPN-6485 > URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/ISPN-6485 > Project: Infinispan > Issue Type: Enhancement > Components: Core > Reporter: Sanne Grinovero > Assignee: Dan Berindei > Priority: Minor > > The resize of an {{HashMap}} is highlighted by the JFR profiler in this method, it's possible that this is very simple to fix by simply creating the Map with a better estimate. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.4.11#64026)

8 years, 8 months

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss JIRA] (ISPN-6484) MarshallableTypeHints.getBufferSizePredictor(Class) is very hot

by Tristan Tarrant (JIRA)

[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/ISPN-6484?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.... ] Tristan Tarrant reassigned ISPN-6484: ------------------------------------- Assignee: Galder Zamarreño > MarshallableTypeHints.getBufferSizePredictor(Class) is very hot > --------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: ISPN-6484 > URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/ISPN-6484 > Project: Infinispan > Issue Type: Enhancement > Components: Core > Reporter: Sanne Grinovero > Assignee: Galder Zamarreño > > This method is very hot, especially on its usage of ConcurrentMap#get > Seems worth to try: > * minimise using this service > * tune the map > * use a special purpose data structure -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.4.11#64026)

8 years, 8 months

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss JIRA] (ISPN-6485) JGroupsTransport.lambda$invokeRemotelyAsync$1 seems to trigger resizes of HashMap

by Tristan Tarrant (JIRA)

[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/ISPN-6485?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.... ] Tristan Tarrant updated ISPN-6485: ---------------------------------- Description: The resize of an {{HashMap}} is highlighted by the JFR profiler in this method, it's possible that this is very simple to fix by simply creating the Map with a better estimate. (was: The resize of an {{HashMap}} is highlighted by the JFR profiler in this method, it's possible that this is very simple to fix my simply creating the Map with a better estimate.) > JGroupsTransport.lambda$invokeRemotelyAsync$1 seems to trigger resizes of HashMap > --------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: ISPN-6485 > URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/ISPN-6485 > Project: Infinispan > Issue Type: Enhancement > Components: Core > Reporter: Sanne Grinovero > Priority: Minor > > The resize of an {{HashMap}} is highlighted by the JFR profiler in this method, it's possible that this is very simple to fix by simply creating the Map with a better estimate. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.4.11#64026)

8 years, 8 months

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss JIRA] (ISPN-6486) NPE in PersistentUUIDManagerImpl

by Tristan Tarrant (JIRA)

[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/ISPN-6486?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.... ] Tristan Tarrant reassigned ISPN-6486: ------------------------------------- Assignee: Tristan Tarrant > NPE in PersistentUUIDManagerImpl > -------------------------------- > > Key: ISPN-6486 > URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/ISPN-6486 > Project: Infinispan > Issue Type: Bug > Components: Core > Reporter: Sanne Grinovero > Assignee: Tristan Tarrant > > I noticed the following exception being logged during the Infinispan core testsuite: > {noformat}FATAL (transport-thread-StaleLocksWithCommitDuringStateTransferTest-NodeD-p27554-t5) [PersistentUUIDManagerImpl] Cannot find mapping for address StaleLocksWithCommitDuringStateTransferTest-NodeD-61391 > java.lang.NullPointerException > at org.infinispan.topology.PersistentUUIDManagerImpl.mapAddresses(PersistentUUIDManagerImpl.java:69) > at org.infinispan.topology.LocalTopologyManagerImpl.doHandleTopologyUpdate(LocalTopologyManagerImpl.java:316) > at org.infinispan.topology.LocalTopologyManagerImpl$1.run(LocalTopologyManagerImpl.java:257) > at java.util.concurrent.Executors$RunnableAdapter.call(Executors.java:511) > at java.util.concurrent.FutureTask.run(FutureTask.java:266) > at org.infinispan.executors.SemaphoreCompletionService$QueueingTask.runInternal(SemaphoreCompletionService.java:172) > at org.infinispan.executors.SemaphoreCompletionService$QueueingTask.run(SemaphoreCompletionService.java:151) > at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1142) > at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecuto{noformat} > It doesn't seem to have caused any test failure, though it seems like a bug. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.4.11#64026)

8 years, 8 months

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss JIRA] (ISPN-6481) Upgrade JGroups to 3.6.8.Final

by Sanne Grinovero (JIRA)

[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/ISPN-6481?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.... ] Sanne Grinovero updated ISPN-6481: ---------------------------------- Status: Resolved (was: Pull Request Sent) Resolution: Done > Upgrade JGroups to 3.6.8.Final > ------------------------------ > > Key: ISPN-6481 > URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/ISPN-6481 > Project: Infinispan > Issue Type: Component Upgrade > Reporter: Pedro Ruivo > Assignee: Pedro Ruivo > Fix For: 9.0.0.Alpha2 > > -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.4.11#64026)

8 years, 8 months

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss JIRA] (ISPN-6481) Upgrade JGroups to 3.6.8.Final

by Sanne Grinovero (JIRA)

[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/ISPN-6481?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.... ] Sanne Grinovero updated ISPN-6481: ---------------------------------- Fix Version/s: 9.0.0.Alpha2 > Upgrade JGroups to 3.6.8.Final > ------------------------------ > > Key: ISPN-6481 > URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/ISPN-6481 > Project: Infinispan > Issue Type: Component Upgrade > Reporter: Pedro Ruivo > Assignee: Pedro Ruivo > Fix For: 9.0.0.Alpha2 > > -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.4.11#64026)

8 years, 8 months

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss JIRA] (ISPN-6491) Remove total order thread pool.

by Pedro Ruivo (JIRA)

Pedro Ruivo created ISPN-6491: --------------------------------- Summary: Remove total order thread pool. Key: ISPN-6491 URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/ISPN-6491 Project: Infinispan Issue Type: Enhancement Components: Core Reporter: Pedro Ruivo Assignee: Pedro Ruivo Fix For: 9.0.0.Alpha2 The thread pool was deprecated and it is no longer used since long time ago. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.4.11#64026)

8 years, 8 months

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss JIRA] (ISPN-6490) Cassandra CacheStore should support properties-based configuration as well

by Tristan Tarrant (JIRA)

Tristan Tarrant created ISPN-6490: ------------------------------------- Summary: Cassandra CacheStore should support properties-based configuration as well Key: ISPN-6490 URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/ISPN-6490 Project: Infinispan Issue Type: Enhancement Components: Loaders and Stores Affects Versions: 9.0.0.Alpha1 Reporter: Tristan Tarrant Assignee: Jakub Markos Fix For: 9.0.0.Final -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.4.11#64026)

8 years, 8 months

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss JIRA] (ISPN-6489) Create (or adjust) autoscaling policies in Openshift

by Sebastian Łaskawiec (JIRA)

[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/ISPN-6489?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.... ] Sebastian Łaskawiec reassigned ISPN-6489: ----------------------------------------- Assignee: Sebastian Łaskawiec > Create (or adjust) autoscaling policies in Openshift > ---------------------------------------------------- > > Key: ISPN-6489 > URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/ISPN-6489 > Project: Infinispan > Issue Type: Feature Request > Reporter: Sebastian Łaskawiec > Assignee: Sebastian Łaskawiec > > During the conference [Ray|https://twitter.com/saturnism] mentioned that it would be really nice to have Openshift autoscaling policies for Infinispan based on: > * number of entries (and/or) > * memory usage > Some examples might be found in his repos -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.4.11#64026)

8 years, 8 months

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss JIRA] (ISPN-6489) Create (or adjust) autoscaling policies in Openshift

by Sebastian Łaskawiec (JIRA)

[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/ISPN-6489?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.... ] Sebastian Łaskawiec updated ISPN-6489: -------------------------------------- Description: During the conference [Ray|https://twitter.com/saturnism] mentioned that it would be really nice to have Openshift autoscaling policies for Infinispan based on: * number of entries (and/or) * memory usage Some examples might be found in his repos was: During the conference [Ray|https://twitter.com/saturnism] mentioned that it would be really nice to have Openshift autoscaling policies for Infinispan based on: * number of entries > Create (or adjust) autoscaling policies in Openshift > ---------------------------------------------------- > > Key: ISPN-6489 > URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/ISPN-6489 > Project: Infinispan > Issue Type: Feature Request > Reporter: Sebastian Łaskawiec > > During the conference [Ray|https://twitter.com/saturnism] mentioned that it would be really nice to have Openshift autoscaling policies for Infinispan based on: > * number of entries (and/or) > * memory usage > Some examples might be found in his repos -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.4.11#64026)

8 years, 8 months

1
0
0 / 0

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

infinispan-issues April 2016