October 2017 - infinispan-issues - Jboss List Archives

[JBoss JIRA] (ISPN-8397) Tune eviction and memory settings for Caching Service

by Sebastian Łaskawiec (JIRA)

[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/ISPN-8397?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.... ] Sebastian Łaskawiec updated ISPN-8397: -------------------------------------- Status: Open (was: New) > Tune eviction and memory settings for Caching Service > ----------------------------------------------------- > > Key: ISPN-8397 > URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/ISPN-8397 > Project: Infinispan > Issue Type: Feature Request > Components: Cloud Integrations > Reporter: Sebastian Łaskawiec > Assignee: Sebastian Łaskawiec > > We need to prevent going out of memory. This requires tuning memory as well as eviction settings. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.5.0#75005)

7 years, 2 months

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss JIRA] (ISPN-8397) Tune eviction and memory settings for Caching Service

by Sebastian Łaskawiec (JIRA)

[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/ISPN-8397?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.... ] Work on ISPN-8397 started by Sebastian Łaskawiec. ------------------------------------------------- > Tune eviction and memory settings for Caching Service > ----------------------------------------------------- > > Key: ISPN-8397 > URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/ISPN-8397 > Project: Infinispan > Issue Type: Feature Request > Components: Cloud Integrations > Reporter: Sebastian Łaskawiec > Assignee: Sebastian Łaskawiec > > We need to prevent going out of memory. This requires tuning memory as well as eviction settings. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.5.0#75005)

7 years, 2 months

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss JIRA] (ISPN-8401) Investigate if we can create ServiceAccount and Role Binding in OpenShift Online

by Sebastian Łaskawiec (JIRA)

[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/ISPN-8401?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.... ] Sebastian Łaskawiec commented on ISPN-8401: ------------------------------------------- Asked {{openshift-sme}} about this dichotomy... > Investigate if we can create ServiceAccount and Role Binding in OpenShift Online > -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: ISPN-8401 > URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/ISPN-8401 > Project: Infinispan > Issue Type: Task > Components: Cloud Integrations > Reporter: Sebastian Łaskawiec > Assignee: Sebastian Łaskawiec > > The {{KUBE_PING}} JGroups protocol (the one that performs discovery) queries Kubernetes API to obtain a list of {{Pods}}. This in turn requires {{view}} permissions (see [Service Accounts on OpenShift User Guide|https://docs.openshift.com/container-platform/3.6/dev_guide/service...]) and a binding object (it's called {{RoleBinding}} and it provides mapping between {{ServiceAccout}} that is used by the {{Pod}} and {{view}} permissions). -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.5.0#75005)

7 years, 2 months

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss JIRA] (ISPN-8401) Investigate if we can create ServiceAccount and Role Binding in OpenShift Online

by Sebastian Łaskawiec (JIRA)

[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/ISPN-8401?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.... ] Sebastian Łaskawiec commented on ISPN-8401: ------------------------------------------- On [OpenShift Online Staging|https://console.free-stg.openshift.com/console] environment creating {{RoleBinding}} is prohibited. {code} make test-ephemeral oc process infinispan-ephemeral | oc create -f - serviceaccount "infinispan-app" created secret "infinispan-app" created service "infinispan-app-http" created service "infinispan-app-hotrod" created service "infinispan-app-management" created configmap "infinispan-app-configuration" created route "infinispan-app-management" created deploymentconfig "infinispan-app" created Error from server (Forbidden): rolebindings "infinispan-app-view" is forbidden: rolebindings to ServiceAccount "infinispan-app" are not allowed in project "slaskawi" make: *** [Makefile:47: test-ephemeral] Error 1 {code} An interesting thing is that I can create it by hand: {code} oc policy add-role-to-user view system:serviceaccount:$(oc project -q):my-new-sa -n $(oc project -q) {code} > Investigate if we can create ServiceAccount and Role Binding in OpenShift Online > -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: ISPN-8401 > URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/ISPN-8401 > Project: Infinispan > Issue Type: Task > Components: Cloud Integrations > Reporter: Sebastian Łaskawiec > Assignee: Sebastian Łaskawiec > > The {{KUBE_PING}} JGroups protocol (the one that performs discovery) queries Kubernetes API to obtain a list of {{Pods}}. This in turn requires {{view}} permissions (see [Service Accounts on OpenShift User Guide|https://docs.openshift.com/container-platform/3.6/dev_guide/service...]) and a binding object (it's called {{RoleBinding}} and it provides mapping between {{ServiceAccout}} that is used by the {{Pod}} and {{view}} permissions). -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.5.0#75005)

7 years, 2 months

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss JIRA] (ISPN-8401) Investigate if we can create ServiceAccount and Role Binding in OpenShift Online

by Sebastian Łaskawiec (JIRA)

[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/ISPN-8401?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.... ] Sebastian Łaskawiec updated ISPN-8401: -------------------------------------- Description: The {{KUBE_PING}} JGroups protocol (the one that performs discovery) queries Kubernetes API to obtain a list of {{Pods}}. This in turn requires {{view}} permissions (see [Service Accounts on OpenShift User Guide|https://docs.openshift.com/container-platform/3.6/dev_guide/service...]) and a binding object (it's called {{RoleBinding}} and it provides mapping between {{ServiceAccout}} that is used by the {{Pod}} and {{view}} permissions). > Investigate if we can create ServiceAccount and Role Binding in OpenShift Online > -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: ISPN-8401 > URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/ISPN-8401 > Project: Infinispan > Issue Type: Task > Components: Cloud Integrations > Reporter: Sebastian Łaskawiec > Assignee: Sebastian Łaskawiec > > The {{KUBE_PING}} JGroups protocol (the one that performs discovery) queries Kubernetes API to obtain a list of {{Pods}}. This in turn requires {{view}} permissions (see [Service Accounts on OpenShift User Guide|https://docs.openshift.com/container-platform/3.6/dev_guide/service...]) and a binding object (it's called {{RoleBinding}} and it provides mapping between {{ServiceAccout}} that is used by the {{Pod}} and {{view}} permissions). -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.5.0#75005)

7 years, 2 months

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss JIRA] (ISPN-8401) Investigate if we can create ServiceAccount and Role Binding in OpenShift Online

by Sebastian Łaskawiec (JIRA)

[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/ISPN-8401?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.... ] Sebastian Łaskawiec updated ISPN-8401: -------------------------------------- Status: Open (was: New) > Investigate if we can create ServiceAccount and Role Binding in OpenShift Online > -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: ISPN-8401 > URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/ISPN-8401 > Project: Infinispan > Issue Type: Task > Components: Cloud Integrations > Reporter: Sebastian Łaskawiec > Assignee: Sebastian Łaskawiec > -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.5.0#75005)

7 years, 2 months

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss JIRA] (ISPN-8400) Adjust merge policies for JDG Online Services

by Emmanuel Bernard (JIRA)

[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/ISPN-8400?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.... ] Emmanuel Bernard commented on ISPN-8400: ---------------------------------------- [~ryanemerson] with reads/writes not accepted once the split brain is detected, do you think that prefer non null is in anyway shape or form better than remove all conflicting entries ? My concern with prefer non null is that it can resurrect old entries it seems. > Adjust merge policies for JDG Online Services > --------------------------------------------- > > Key: ISPN-8400 > URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/ISPN-8400 > Project: Infinispan > Issue Type: Feature Request > Components: Cloud Integrations > Reporter: Sebastian Łaskawiec > Assignee: Ryan Emerson > > Both Shared Memory and Caching Service require custom merge policies. > In Caching Service we need to clear out all conflicted entries upon split brain. Shared Memory service might be a little bit more tricky and we might want to use some different strategy (but that needs to be checked out). -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.5.0#75005)

7 years, 2 months

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss JIRA] (ISPN-8344) DSL queries filtering only on type are always executed without index

by Adrian Nistor (JIRA)

[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/ISPN-8344?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.... ] Adrian Nistor updated ISPN-8344: -------------------------------- Fix Version/s: 9.2.0.Alpha2 9.1.2.Final (was: 9.2.0.Beta1) (was: 9.1.3.Final) > DSL queries filtering only on type are always executed without index > -------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: ISPN-8344 > URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/ISPN-8344 > Project: Infinispan > Issue Type: Bug > Components: Embedded Querying, Remote Querying > Affects Versions: 9.0.0.Final > Reporter: Adrian Nistor > Assignee: Adrian Nistor > Fix For: 9.0.4.Final, 8.2.9.Final, 9.1.2.Final, 9.2.0.Alpha2 > > > This happens if the WHERE clause is empty or a tautology (true). In this case the query is wrongly executed unindexed even though the index should be at least used for filtering on type. > The query > {code} > FROM org.infinispan.test.Person > {code} > or > {code} > qf.from(Person.class).build(); > {code} > is such a case -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.5.0#75005)

7 years, 2 months

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss JIRA] (ISPN-8387) Upgrade Protostream to 4.1.1.Final

by Adrian Nistor (JIRA)

[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/ISPN-8387?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.... ] Adrian Nistor updated ISPN-8387: -------------------------------- Status: Resolved (was: Pull Request Sent) Fix Version/s: 9.1.2.Final (was: 9.1.3.Final) Resolution: Done This was actually included in 9.1.2.Final but the issue was left open by mistake. > Upgrade Protostream to 4.1.1.Final > ---------------------------------- > > Key: ISPN-8387 > URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/ISPN-8387 > Project: Infinispan > Issue Type: Component Upgrade > Components: Remote Querying > Reporter: Adrian Nistor > Assignee: Adrian Nistor > Fix For: 9.1.2.Final > > -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.5.0#75005)

7 years, 2 months

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss JIRA] (ISPN-8387) Upgrade Protostream to 4.1.1.Final

by Adrian Nistor (JIRA)

[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/ISPN-8387?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.... ] Adrian Nistor updated ISPN-8387: -------------------------------- Status: Pull Request Sent (was: Coding In Progress) Git Pull Request: https://github.com/infinispan/infinispan/pull/5511 > Upgrade Protostream to 4.1.1.Final > ---------------------------------- > > Key: ISPN-8387 > URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/ISPN-8387 > Project: Infinispan > Issue Type: Component Upgrade > Components: Remote Querying > Reporter: Adrian Nistor > Assignee: Adrian Nistor > Fix For: 9.1.3.Final > > -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.5.0#75005)

7 years, 2 months

1
0
0 / 0

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

infinispan-issues October 2017