[JBoss JIRA] (ISPN-5575) Shared write-behind store can read stale entries on joiner
by Tristan Tarrant (JIRA)
[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/ISPN-5575?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.... ]
Tristan Tarrant updated ISPN-5575:
----------------------------------
Fix Version/s: 9.1.0.Final
(was: 9.0.0.Final)
> Shared write-behind store can read stale entries on joiner
> ----------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: ISPN-5575
> URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/ISPN-5575
> Project: Infinispan
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: Core, Loaders and Stores
> Affects Versions: 8.0.0.Alpha2, 7.2.3.Final
> Reporter: Dan Berindei
> Assignee: Dan Berindei
> Fix For: 9.1.0.Final
>
>
> The AsyncCacheWriter modification queue is not sent with state transfer when the store is shared. A joiner can then read from the shared store a stale version of entries that have updates in the modification queue but are no longer in memory (because they were either removed explicitly, or evicted).
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.2.3#72005)
7 years, 8 months
[JBoss JIRA] (ISPN-5600) Optimize transactions on multiple caches
by Tristan Tarrant (JIRA)
[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/ISPN-5600?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.... ]
Tristan Tarrant updated ISPN-5600:
----------------------------------
Fix Version/s: 9.1.0.Final
(was: 9.0.0.Final)
> Optimize transactions on multiple caches
> ----------------------------------------
>
> Key: ISPN-5600
> URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/ISPN-5600
> Project: Infinispan
> Issue Type: Enhancement
> Components: Transactions
> Affects Versions: 8.0.0.Alpha2
> Reporter: Radim Vansa
> Fix For: 9.1.0.Final
>
>
> NON_XA transactions that span multiple caches are registered as multiple synchronizations, and these synchronizations are often processed sequentially ^1^; therefore, we send synchronous PrepareCommand for each cache and then CommitCommand for each cache as well, delaying the commit by these round-trips.
> Since the targets for different caches may differ, we still need to send the RPCs separately, but in parallel. Therefore, there should be one uber-synchronization for all caches that use NON_XA mode (and maybe something similar with XA). I believe that using single synchronization could save some allocations, too.
> ^1^ Not sure if full-fledged JTA implementations do that; JTA spec does not say anything about the order of synchronizations and whether these should be processed in parallel.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.2.3#72005)
7 years, 8 months
[JBoss JIRA] (ISPN-5574) Define high-level cache capabilities
by Tristan Tarrant (JIRA)
[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/ISPN-5574?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.... ]
Tristan Tarrant updated ISPN-5574:
----------------------------------
Fix Version/s: 9.1.0.Final
(was: 9.0.0.Final)
> Define high-level cache capabilities
> ------------------------------------
>
> Key: ISPN-5574
> URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/ISPN-5574
> Project: Infinispan
> Issue Type: Feature Request
> Components: Configuration, Core
> Affects Versions: 7.2.3.Final
> Reporter: Dan Berindei
> Priority: Minor
> Fix For: 9.1.0.Final
>
>
> Infinispan's configuration is very flexible, and it's sometimes hard to figure out how different settings affect things like cache consistency.
> For example, the lucene-directory module uses the fairly complicated {{Configurations.noDataLossOnJoiner()}} method to validate that a cache is safe for storing lucene indexes.
> Another example is users who would like to use a store for backup, but they don't want read from the store for M/R tasks or when get(k) doesn't find the key in memory.
> One idea would be to define a set of "capabilities" like "state-transfer-complete" or "all-data-in-memory". The user could then add those capabilities in the cache definition, and the cache won't start if the configuration violates those capabilities. The capabilities would also be used internally, to improve the error message when a feature requires a particular combination of settings.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.2.3#72005)
7 years, 8 months
[JBoss JIRA] (ISPN-5584) Support fine-grained write skew check for FineGrainedAtomicMap entries
by Tristan Tarrant (JIRA)
[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/ISPN-5584?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.... ]
Tristan Tarrant updated ISPN-5584:
----------------------------------
Fix Version/s: 9.1.0.Final
(was: 9.0.0.Final)
> Support fine-grained write skew check for FineGrainedAtomicMap entries
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: ISPN-5584
> URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/ISPN-5584
> Project: Infinispan
> Issue Type: Feature Request
> Components: Core
> Affects Versions: 8.0.0.Alpha2, 7.2.3.Final
> Reporter: Dan Berindei
> Fix For: 9.1.0.Final
>
>
> FineGrainedAtomicMap doesn't currently work with write skew check enabled.
> I was able to make it work by adding a special case for DeltaAwareCacheEntry in WriteSkewHelper, however the map has a single version, so the write skew check fails if any of the sub-keys were modified in parallel. With pessimistic locking, fine-grained maps allow the user to modify different sub-keys concurrently, we should allow the same with optimistic locking.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.2.3#72005)
7 years, 8 months