[JBoss JIRA] (ISPN-9733) Proposal for 10 Documentation Restructure
by Don Naro (Jira)
Don Naro created ISPN-9733:
------------------------------
Summary: Proposal for 10 Documentation Restructure
Key: ISPN-9733
URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/ISPN-9733
Project: Infinispan
Issue Type: Enhancement
Components: Documentation-Core
Affects Versions: 10.0.0.Alpha2
Reporter: Don Naro
Assignee: Don Naro
Fix For: 10.0.0.Final
Don to create a detailed proposal for restructuring the ISPN documentation library. New organization for content.
Present proposal to team and review. Outcome should be clear idea of what we want to deliver and then breaking it down into tasks.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v7.12.1#712002)
6 years, 1 month
[JBoss JIRA] (ISPN-4075) State transfer should preserve the creation timestamp of entries
by Tristan Tarrant (Jira)
[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/ISPN-4075?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.... ]
Tristan Tarrant updated ISPN-4075:
----------------------------------
Sprint: Sprint 10.0.0.Beta1
> State transfer should preserve the creation timestamp of entries
> ----------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: ISPN-4075
> URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/ISPN-4075
> Project: Infinispan
> Issue Type: Feature Request
> Components: Core
> Affects Versions: 6.0.1.Final
> Reporter: Dan Berindei
> Assignee: Dan Berindei
> Priority: Major
> Fix For: 10.0.0.Final
>
>
> State transfer inserts values with the current time as the creation time. Since the entries store the expected lifespan and not the expected expiration time, entries on the receiving node could expire much later than intended.
> The argument probably doesn't apply to the timestamp of the last usage. Since state transfer process could be interpreted as a reader, it should be fine to extend the update the time of the last usage both on the sending node and on the receiving node.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v7.12.1#712002)
6 years, 1 month
[JBoss JIRA] (ISPN-4075) State transfer should preserve the creation timestamp of entries
by Tristan Tarrant (Jira)
[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/ISPN-4075?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.... ]
Tristan Tarrant reassigned ISPN-4075:
-------------------------------------
Assignee: Dan Berindei
> State transfer should preserve the creation timestamp of entries
> ----------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: ISPN-4075
> URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/ISPN-4075
> Project: Infinispan
> Issue Type: Feature Request
> Components: Core
> Affects Versions: 6.0.1.Final
> Reporter: Dan Berindei
> Assignee: Dan Berindei
> Priority: Major
> Fix For: 10.0.0.Final
>
>
> State transfer inserts values with the current time as the creation time. Since the entries store the expected lifespan and not the expected expiration time, entries on the receiving node could expire much later than intended.
> The argument probably doesn't apply to the timestamp of the last usage. Since state transfer process could be interpreted as a reader, it should be fine to extend the update the time of the last usage both on the sending node and on the receiving node.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v7.12.1#712002)
6 years, 1 month
[JBoss JIRA] (ISPN-9332) REPL local iteration optimization cannot be used when store has write behind
by William Burns (Jira)
[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/ISPN-9332?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.... ]
William Burns commented on ISPN-9332:
-------------------------------------
I created ISPN-9732 for it.
> REPL local iteration optimization cannot be used when store has write behind
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: ISPN-9332
> URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/ISPN-9332
> Project: Infinispan
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: Loaders and Stores, Streams
> Affects Versions: 9.3.0.Final
> Reporter: William Burns
> Assignee: William Burns
> Priority: Major
> Fix For: 9.4.0.CR3
>
>
> When write behind is enabled, the write modification is stored on the primary owner. REPL local iteration can read from non owned data, thus causing an inconsistency.
> Thus distributed streams should always go remote when not all segments are primarily owned on a given node when write behind is enabled.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v7.12.1#712002)
6 years, 1 month
[JBoss JIRA] (ISPN-9732) Local iteration optimization with write behind is valid for non shared stores
by William Burns (Jira)
William Burns created ISPN-9732:
-----------------------------------
Summary: Local iteration optimization with write behind is valid for non shared stores
Key: ISPN-9732
URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/ISPN-9732
Project: Infinispan
Issue Type: Bug
Components: Core, Loaders and Stores
Affects Versions: 9.4.1.Final
Reporter: William Burns
Assignee: William Burns
ISPN-9332 disabled iteration optimization when an async store is present. This is only required for shared stores, since non shared stores will write to the async store on each node.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v7.12.1#712002)
6 years, 1 month
[JBoss JIRA] (ISPN-9332) REPL local iteration optimization cannot be used when store has write behind
by William Burns (Jira)
[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/ISPN-9332?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.... ]
William Burns commented on ISPN-9332:
-------------------------------------
Hrmm, I concur. This should only be needed for shared stores with REPL.
> REPL local iteration optimization cannot be used when store has write behind
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: ISPN-9332
> URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/ISPN-9332
> Project: Infinispan
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: Loaders and Stores, Streams
> Affects Versions: 9.3.0.Final
> Reporter: William Burns
> Assignee: William Burns
> Priority: Major
> Fix For: 9.4.0.CR3
>
>
> When write behind is enabled, the write modification is stored on the primary owner. REPL local iteration can read from non owned data, thus causing an inconsistency.
> Thus distributed streams should always go remote when not all segments are primarily owned on a given node when write behind is enabled.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v7.12.1#712002)
6 years, 1 month