Marc Bridner created ISPN-2986: ---------------------------------- Summary: Intermittent failure to start new nodes during heavy write load Key: ISPN-2986 URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/ISPN-2986 Project: Infinispan Issue Type: Bug Components: Distributed Cache, Server Affects Versions: 5.2.5.Final Environment: 4 servers running linux 2.6.32-220.13.1.el6.x86_64 with 2x QuadCore 2.4ghz CPU's Gigabit ethernet, same switch. java version "1.7.0" Java(TM) SE Runtime Environment (build 1.7.0-b147) Java HotSpot(TM) 64-Bit Server VM (build 21.0-b17, mixed mode) Reporter: Marc Bridner Assignee: Tristan Tarrant Attachments: logs.zip, test-infinispan.xml, test-jgroups.xml, test.infinispan.zip When under heavy write load from a hotrod client with 64+ threads and a new node is started, the new node will sometimes fail to start, eventually giving off state transfer timeouts and finally terminating. During the time it takes it to time out (~10 minutes) the hotrod client is totally blocked. Setup is as follows: 3 servers, 1 client * dl30x2385, 10.64.106.21, client * dl30x2384, 10.64.106.20, first node * dl30x2383, 10.64.106.19, second node * dl30x2382, 10.64.106.18, third node 2 caches, initial state transfer off, transactions on, config is attached. Small app that triggers the problem is also attached. Steps to reproduce: 1. Start first node 2. Start client, wait for counter to reach 50000 (in client) 3. Start second node. 10% chance it'll fail. 4. Wait for counter to reach 100000 in client. 5. Start third node, 50% chance it'll fail. If it doesn't fail, terminate everything and start over. I realize this may be hard to reproduce, so if any more logs or tests are needed, let me know. I've been unable to reproduce it on a single physical machine, and it only occurs when using more than 64 threads. Changing the ratio of writes between the caches also seems to make it not occur. I was unable to reproduce it with TRACE log level on (too slow), but if you can specify some packages that you want traces of, that might work. Turning transactions off makes it worse, 90% chance to fail on second node. Funny enough, disabling the concurrent GC lowers the failure rate to 10% on third node. Guessing race condition somewhere, may be similar to ISPN-2982. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira