[JBoss JIRA] (ISPN-3766) "containsKey" and "get" methods are not working properly with "putForExternalRead" during active transaction. WriteSkewException appears.
by V L (JIRA)
[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/ISPN-3766?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.... ]
V L edited comment on ISPN-3766 at 11/27/13 9:58 AM:
-----------------------------------------------------
del
was (Author: exmortal):
-
> "containsKey" and "get" methods are not working properly with "putForExternalRead" during active transaction. WriteSkewException appears.
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: ISPN-3766
> URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/ISPN-3766
> Project: Infinispan
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: Transactions
> Affects Versions: 5.3.0.Final, 6.0.0.CR1, 6.0.0.Final
> Reporter: V L
> Assignee: Mircea Markus
> Attachments: InfinispanTest.java
>
>
> I'm not new with Infinispan, we use it from 5.3 version. Now I'm working on adding WriteSkew functional to our project, but unfortunately it's not working as we expected.
> We use infinispan like a cache for mongoDb data source, but this situation doesn't depends on data source vendor.
> The problem is that WriteSkewException is available in specific situation, here are steps for reproducing:
> 1) begin tx -> create an new element -> commit tx.
> 2) wait until cache expires. cache is empty now
> 3) being tx -> try to get element from cache, but it's not found -> load element from data source -> put it to the cache via putForExternalRead for read access outside of current transaction.
> 4) make some modification with element -> put element to cache -> commit tx -> WriteSkewException
> here is my log:
> TX BEGIN tx_status=6 thread=1
> PUT id=key1, tx_status=0, thread=1 cache_size=1, cache_ contains=key:key1, value:value
> TX COMMIT tx_status=0 thread=1
> TX BEGIN. tx_status=6, thread=1
> SIZE id=key1 tx_status=0, thread=1 cache_size=1 contains=key:key1, value:null
> PUT_FOR_EXTERNAL_READ id=key1, tx_status=0 thread=1 cache_size=1 cache_contains=key:key1, value:null
> PUT id=key1 tx_status=0 thread=1 cache_size=1 contains=key:key1, value:value
> TX COMMIT status=0 thread=1
> ISPN000005: Detected write skew on key [1]. Another process has changed the entry since we last read it! Unable to copy entry for update.
> Exception executing call org.infinispan.transaction.WriteSkewException: Detected write skew.
> I think I found the problem is in "get" method. When you invoke "get" method with key that not available in cache, infinispan create an "null" element in cache. This element won't be updated by putForExternalRead method (look at log above). If you skip "get" method invocation everithing will work fine. By the way, everithing is working fine if you skip "step 2" of the scenario.
> I use workaround for this situation. I check if element exist in the cache not by "containsKey" or "get" method but via cache.keySet().contains(key)
> This works ok
> I'm looking forward for you comments, maybe I'm doing something wrong.
> Thanks
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
10 years, 5 months
[JBoss JIRA] (ISPN-3766) "containsKey" and "get" methods are not working properly with "putForExternalRead" during active transaction. WriteSkewException appears.
by V L (JIRA)
[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/ISPN-3766?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.... ]
V L edited comment on ISPN-3766 at 11/27/13 9:55 AM:
-----------------------------------------------------
-
was (Author: exmortal):
I think this is not expected behavior because:
- If I don't use "get" method everything is working ok.
- If cache already contains element before "get" invocation - everything is working ok
- when I use my workaround for "containsKey" functional - everything is working ok (e.g cache.keySet().contains(key))
The problem is that I don't need to do read operation at 3, I need to check if element exists in the cache. I need a "containsKey" method, but this method has the same implementation as "get".
> "containsKey" and "get" methods are not working properly with "putForExternalRead" during active transaction. WriteSkewException appears.
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: ISPN-3766
> URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/ISPN-3766
> Project: Infinispan
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: Transactions
> Affects Versions: 5.3.0.Final, 6.0.0.CR1, 6.0.0.Final
> Reporter: V L
> Assignee: Mircea Markus
> Attachments: InfinispanTest.java
>
>
> I'm not new with Infinispan, we use it from 5.3 version. Now I'm working on adding WriteSkew functional to our project, but unfortunately it's not working as we expected.
> We use infinispan like a cache for mongoDb data source, but this situation doesn't depends on data source vendor.
> The problem is that WriteSkewException is available in specific situation, here are steps for reproducing:
> 1) begin tx -> create an new element -> commit tx.
> 2) wait until cache expires. cache is empty now
> 3) being tx -> try to get element from cache, but it's not found -> load element from data source -> put it to the cache via putForExternalRead for read access outside of current transaction.
> 4) make some modification with element -> put element to cache -> commit tx -> WriteSkewException
> here is my log:
> TX BEGIN tx_status=6 thread=1
> PUT id=key1, tx_status=0, thread=1 cache_size=1, cache_ contains=key:key1, value:value
> TX COMMIT tx_status=0 thread=1
> TX BEGIN. tx_status=6, thread=1
> SIZE id=key1 tx_status=0, thread=1 cache_size=1 contains=key:key1, value:null
> PUT_FOR_EXTERNAL_READ id=key1, tx_status=0 thread=1 cache_size=1 cache_contains=key:key1, value:null
> PUT id=key1 tx_status=0 thread=1 cache_size=1 contains=key:key1, value:value
> TX COMMIT status=0 thread=1
> ISPN000005: Detected write skew on key [1]. Another process has changed the entry since we last read it! Unable to copy entry for update.
> Exception executing call org.infinispan.transaction.WriteSkewException: Detected write skew.
> I think I found the problem is in "get" method. When you invoke "get" method with key that not available in cache, infinispan create an "null" element in cache. This element won't be updated by putForExternalRead method (look at log above). If you skip "get" method invocation everithing will work fine. By the way, everithing is working fine if you skip "step 2" of the scenario.
> I use workaround for this situation. I check if element exist in the cache not by "containsKey" or "get" method but via cache.keySet().contains(key)
> This works ok
> I'm looking forward for you comments, maybe I'm doing something wrong.
> Thanks
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
10 years, 5 months
[JBoss JIRA] (ISPN-3766) "containsKey" and "get" methods are not working properly with "putForExternalRead" during active transaction. WriteSkewException appears.
by V L (JIRA)
[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/ISPN-3766?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.... ]
V L reopened ISPN-3766:
-----------------------
I think this is not expected behavior because:
- If I don't use "get" method everything is working ok.
- If cache already contains element before "get" invocation - everything is working ok
- when I use my workaround for "containsKey" functional - everything is working ok (e.g cache.keySet().contains(key))
The problem is that I don't need to do read operation at 3, I need to check if element exists in the cache. I need a "containsKey" method, but this method has the same implementation as "get".
> "containsKey" and "get" methods are not working properly with "putForExternalRead" during active transaction. WriteSkewException appears.
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: ISPN-3766
> URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/ISPN-3766
> Project: Infinispan
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: Transactions
> Affects Versions: 5.3.0.Final, 6.0.0.CR1, 6.0.0.Final
> Reporter: V L
> Assignee: Mircea Markus
> Attachments: InfinispanTest.java
>
>
> I'm not new with Infinispan, we use it from 5.3 version. Now I'm working on adding WriteSkew functional to our project, but unfortunately it's not working as we expected.
> We use infinispan like a cache for mongoDb data source, but this situation doesn't depends on data source vendor.
> The problem is that WriteSkewException is available in specific situation, here are steps for reproducing:
> 1) begin tx -> create an new element -> commit tx.
> 2) wait until cache expires. cache is empty now
> 3) being tx -> try to get element from cache, but it's not found -> load element from data source -> put it to the cache via putForExternalRead for read access outside of current transaction.
> 4) make some modification with element -> put element to cache -> commit tx -> WriteSkewException
> here is my log:
> TX BEGIN tx_status=6 thread=1
> PUT id=key1, tx_status=0, thread=1 cache_size=1, cache_ contains=key:key1, value:value
> TX COMMIT tx_status=0 thread=1
> TX BEGIN. tx_status=6, thread=1
> SIZE id=key1 tx_status=0, thread=1 cache_size=1 contains=key:key1, value:null
> PUT_FOR_EXTERNAL_READ id=key1, tx_status=0 thread=1 cache_size=1 cache_contains=key:key1, value:null
> PUT id=key1 tx_status=0 thread=1 cache_size=1 contains=key:key1, value:value
> TX COMMIT status=0 thread=1
> ISPN000005: Detected write skew on key [1]. Another process has changed the entry since we last read it! Unable to copy entry for update.
> Exception executing call org.infinispan.transaction.WriteSkewException: Detected write skew.
> I think I found the problem is in "get" method. When you invoke "get" method with key that not available in cache, infinispan create an "null" element in cache. This element won't be updated by putForExternalRead method (look at log above). If you skip "get" method invocation everithing will work fine. By the way, everithing is working fine if you skip "step 2" of the scenario.
> I use workaround for this situation. I check if element exist in the cache not by "containsKey" or "get" method but via cache.keySet().contains(key)
> This works ok
> I'm looking forward for you comments, maybe I'm doing something wrong.
> Thanks
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
10 years, 5 months
[JBoss JIRA] (ISPN-3766) "containsKey" and "get" methods are not working properly with "putForExternalRead" during active transaction. WriteSkewException appears.
by V L (JIRA)
[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/ISPN-3766?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.... ]
V L commented on ISPN-3766:
---------------------------
I think this is not expected behavior because:
- If I don't use "get" method everything is working ok.
- If cache already contains element before "get" invocation - everything is working ok
- when I use my workaround for "containsKey" functional - everything is working ok (e.g cache.keySet().contains(key))
The problem is that I don't need to do read operation at 3, I need to check if element exists in the cache. I need a "containsKey" method, but this method has the same implementation as "get".
> "containsKey" and "get" methods are not working properly with "putForExternalRead" during active transaction. WriteSkewException appears.
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: ISPN-3766
> URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/ISPN-3766
> Project: Infinispan
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: Transactions
> Affects Versions: 5.3.0.Final, 6.0.0.CR1, 6.0.0.Final
> Reporter: V L
> Assignee: Mircea Markus
> Attachments: InfinispanTest.java
>
>
> I'm not new with Infinispan, we use it from 5.3 version. Now I'm working on adding WriteSkew functional to our project, but unfortunately it's not working as we expected.
> We use infinispan like a cache for mongoDb data source, but this situation doesn't depends on data source vendor.
> The problem is that WriteSkewException is available in specific situation, here are steps for reproducing:
> 1) begin tx -> create an new element -> commit tx.
> 2) wait until cache expires. cache is empty now
> 3) being tx -> try to get element from cache, but it's not found -> load element from data source -> put it to the cache via putForExternalRead for read access outside of current transaction.
> 4) make some modification with element -> put element to cache -> commit tx -> WriteSkewException
> here is my log:
> TX BEGIN tx_status=6 thread=1
> PUT id=key1, tx_status=0, thread=1 cache_size=1, cache_ contains=key:key1, value:value
> TX COMMIT tx_status=0 thread=1
> TX BEGIN. tx_status=6, thread=1
> SIZE id=key1 tx_status=0, thread=1 cache_size=1 contains=key:key1, value:null
> PUT_FOR_EXTERNAL_READ id=key1, tx_status=0 thread=1 cache_size=1 cache_contains=key:key1, value:null
> PUT id=key1 tx_status=0 thread=1 cache_size=1 contains=key:key1, value:value
> TX COMMIT status=0 thread=1
> ISPN000005: Detected write skew on key [1]. Another process has changed the entry since we last read it! Unable to copy entry for update.
> Exception executing call org.infinispan.transaction.WriteSkewException: Detected write skew.
> I think I found the problem is in "get" method. When you invoke "get" method with key that not available in cache, infinispan create an "null" element in cache. This element won't be updated by putForExternalRead method (look at log above). If you skip "get" method invocation everithing will work fine. By the way, everithing is working fine if you skip "step 2" of the scenario.
> I use workaround for this situation. I check if element exist in the cache not by "containsKey" or "get" method but via cache.keySet().contains(key)
> This works ok
> I'm looking forward for you comments, maybe I'm doing something wrong.
> Thanks
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
10 years, 5 months
[JBoss JIRA] (ISPN-3766) "containsKey" and "get" methods are not working properly with "putForExternalRead" during active transaction. WriteSkewException appears.
by Mircea Markus (JIRA)
[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/ISPN-3766?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.... ]
Mircea Markus resolved ISPN-3766.
---------------------------------
Resolution: Rejected
work as expected.
> "containsKey" and "get" methods are not working properly with "putForExternalRead" during active transaction. WriteSkewException appears.
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: ISPN-3766
> URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/ISPN-3766
> Project: Infinispan
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: Transactions
> Affects Versions: 5.3.0.Final, 6.0.0.CR1, 6.0.0.Final
> Reporter: V L
> Assignee: Mircea Markus
> Attachments: InfinispanTest.java
>
>
> I'm not new with Infinispan, we use it from 5.3 version. Now I'm working on adding WriteSkew functional to our project, but unfortunately it's not working as we expected.
> We use infinispan like a cache for mongoDb data source, but this situation doesn't depends on data source vendor.
> The problem is that WriteSkewException is available in specific situation, here are steps for reproducing:
> 1) begin tx -> create an new element -> commit tx.
> 2) wait until cache expires. cache is empty now
> 3) being tx -> try to get element from cache, but it's not found -> load element from data source -> put it to the cache via putForExternalRead for read access outside of current transaction.
> 4) make some modification with element -> put element to cache -> commit tx -> WriteSkewException
> here is my log:
> TX BEGIN tx_status=6 thread=1
> PUT id=key1, tx_status=0, thread=1 cache_size=1, cache_ contains=key:key1, value:value
> TX COMMIT tx_status=0 thread=1
> TX BEGIN. tx_status=6, thread=1
> SIZE id=key1 tx_status=0, thread=1 cache_size=1 contains=key:key1, value:null
> PUT_FOR_EXTERNAL_READ id=key1, tx_status=0 thread=1 cache_size=1 cache_contains=key:key1, value:null
> PUT id=key1 tx_status=0 thread=1 cache_size=1 contains=key:key1, value:value
> TX COMMIT status=0 thread=1
> ISPN000005: Detected write skew on key [1]. Another process has changed the entry since we last read it! Unable to copy entry for update.
> Exception executing call org.infinispan.transaction.WriteSkewException: Detected write skew.
> I think I found the problem is in "get" method. When you invoke "get" method with key that not available in cache, infinispan create an "null" element in cache. This element won't be updated by putForExternalRead method (look at log above). If you skip "get" method invocation everithing will work fine. By the way, everithing is working fine if you skip "step 2" of the scenario.
> I use workaround for this situation. I check if element exist in the cache not by "containsKey" or "get" method but via cache.keySet().contains(key)
> This works ok
> I'm looking forward for you comments, maybe I'm doing something wrong.
> Thanks
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
10 years, 5 months
[JBoss JIRA] (ISPN-3766) "containsKey" and "get" methods are not working properly with "putForExternalRead" during active transaction. WriteSkewException appears.
by Mircea Markus (JIRA)
[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/ISPN-3766?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.... ]
Mircea Markus commented on ISPN-3766:
-------------------------------------
I think this is expected behavior, because at 3 you do a read on key, then key is updated outside of your transaction. Updating the key within your transaction (not using putForExternalRead) should solve the issue.
> "containsKey" and "get" methods are not working properly with "putForExternalRead" during active transaction. WriteSkewException appears.
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: ISPN-3766
> URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/ISPN-3766
> Project: Infinispan
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: Transactions
> Affects Versions: 5.3.0.Final, 6.0.0.CR1, 6.0.0.Final
> Reporter: V L
> Assignee: Mircea Markus
> Attachments: InfinispanTest.java
>
>
> I'm not new with Infinispan, we use it from 5.3 version. Now I'm working on adding WriteSkew functional to our project, but unfortunately it's not working as we expected.
> We use infinispan like a cache for mongoDb data source, but this situation doesn't depends on data source vendor.
> The problem is that WriteSkewException is available in specific situation, here are steps for reproducing:
> 1) begin tx -> create an new element -> commit tx.
> 2) wait until cache expires. cache is empty now
> 3) being tx -> try to get element from cache, but it's not found -> load element from data source -> put it to the cache via putForExternalRead for read access outside of current transaction.
> 4) make some modification with element -> put element to cache -> commit tx -> WriteSkewException
> here is my log:
> TX BEGIN tx_status=6 thread=1
> PUT id=key1, tx_status=0, thread=1 cache_size=1, cache_ contains=key:key1, value:value
> TX COMMIT tx_status=0 thread=1
> TX BEGIN. tx_status=6, thread=1
> SIZE id=key1 tx_status=0, thread=1 cache_size=1 contains=key:key1, value:null
> PUT_FOR_EXTERNAL_READ id=key1, tx_status=0 thread=1 cache_size=1 cache_contains=key:key1, value:null
> PUT id=key1 tx_status=0 thread=1 cache_size=1 contains=key:key1, value:value
> TX COMMIT status=0 thread=1
> ISPN000005: Detected write skew on key [1]. Another process has changed the entry since we last read it! Unable to copy entry for update.
> Exception executing call org.infinispan.transaction.WriteSkewException: Detected write skew.
> I think I found the problem is in "get" method. When you invoke "get" method with key that not available in cache, infinispan create an "null" element in cache. This element won't be updated by putForExternalRead method (look at log above). If you skip "get" method invocation everithing will work fine. By the way, everithing is working fine if you skip "step 2" of the scenario.
> I use workaround for this situation. I check if element exist in the cache not by "containsKey" or "get" method but via cache.keySet().contains(key)
> This works ok
> I'm looking forward for you comments, maybe I'm doing something wrong.
> Thanks
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
10 years, 5 months
[JBoss JIRA] (ISPN-3766) "containsKey" and "get" methods are not working properly with "putForExternalRead" during active transaction. WriteSkewException appears.
by V L (JIRA)
[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/ISPN-3766?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.... ]
V L updated ISPN-3766:
----------------------
Summary: "containsKey" and "get" methods are not working properly with "putForExternalRead" during active transaction. WriteSkewException appears. (was: WriteSkewException )
> "containsKey" and "get" methods are not working properly with "putForExternalRead" during active transaction. WriteSkewException appears.
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: ISPN-3766
> URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/ISPN-3766
> Project: Infinispan
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: Transactions
> Affects Versions: 5.3.0.Final, 6.0.0.CR1, 6.0.0.Final
> Reporter: V L
> Assignee: Mircea Markus
> Attachments: InfinispanTest.java
>
>
> I'm not new with Infinispan, we use it from 5.3 version. Now I'm working on adding WriteSkew functional to our project, but unfortunately it's not working as we expected.
> We use infinispan like a cache for mongoDb data source, but this situation doesn't depends on data source vendor.
> The problem is that WriteSkewException is available in specific situation, here are steps for reproducing:
> 1) begin tx -> create an new element -> commit tx.
> 2) wait until cache expires. cache is empty now
> 3) being tx -> try to get element from cache, but it's not found -> load element from data source -> put it to the cache via putForExternalRead for read access outside of current transaction.
> 4) make some modification with element -> put element to cache -> commit tx -> WriteSkewException
> here is my log:
> TX BEGIN tx_status=6 thread=1
> PUT id=key1, tx_status=0, thread=1 cache_size=1, cache_ contains=key:key1, value:value
> TX COMMIT tx_status=0 thread=1
> TX BEGIN. tx_status=6, thread=1
> SIZE id=key1 tx_status=0, thread=1 cache_size=1 contains=key:key1, value:null
> PUT_FOR_EXTERNAL_READ id=key1, tx_status=0 thread=1 cache_size=1 cache_contains=key:key1, value:null
> PUT id=key1 tx_status=0 thread=1 cache_size=1 contains=key:key1, value:value
> TX COMMIT status=0 thread=1
> ISPN000005: Detected write skew on key [1]. Another process has changed the entry since we last read it! Unable to copy entry for update.
> Exception executing call org.infinispan.transaction.WriteSkewException: Detected write skew.
> I think I found the problem is in "get" method. When you invoke "get" method with key that not available in cache, infinispan create an "null" element in cache. This element won't be updated by putForExternalRead method (look at log above). If you skip "get" method invocation everithing will work fine. By the way, everithing is working fine if you skip "step 2" of the scenario.
> I use workaround for this situation. I check if element exist in the cache not by "containsKey" or "get" method but via cache.keySet().contains(key)
> This works ok
> I'm looking forward for you comments, maybe I'm doing something wrong.
> Thanks
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
10 years, 5 months
[JBoss JIRA] (ISPN-3364) Tests from org.infinispan.atomic package fail with AssertionError
by William Burns (JIRA)
[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/ISPN-3364?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.... ]
William Burns edited comment on ISPN-3364 at 11/27/13 8:25 AM:
---------------------------------------------------------------
I was finally able to reproduce this in a way that I could debug to see what is going on. And needless to say that hasn't even helped.
In testing the ReplDeltaAwarePassivationTest I was able to narrow the culprit down to a single line where things were not working.
In BoundedConcurrentHashMap:1719 it is finally assigning the new entry to the array. For some reason this affects both the DataContainer and the DummyInMemoryCacheStore entries maps and ends up removing the additional element. Looking at all the references between the dc and store there is nothing shared in the map and doesn't make much sense as to why this occurs. I have tried changing the hash maps that are used in both the DataContainer and DummyStore to use different implementations respectively but it hasn't change the outcome either.
I haven't been able to debug fully the LocalDeltaAwarePassivationTest issue yet as it only is reproducible in a full maven run with all the tests.
was (Author: william.burns):
I was finally able to reproduce this in a way that I could debug to see what is going on. And needless to say that hasn't even helped.
In testing the ReplDeltaAwarePassivationTest I was able to narrow the culprit down to a single line where things were not working.
In BoundedConcurrentHashMap:1719 it is finally assigning the new entry to the array. For some reason this affects both the DataContainer and the DummyInMemoryCacheStore entries maps and ends up removing the additional element. Looking at all the references between the dc and store there is nothing shared in the map and doesn't make much sense as to why this occurs. I have tried changing the hash maps that are used in both the DataContainer and DummyStore to use different implementations respectively but it hasn't change the outcome either.
I haven't been able to reproduce the LocalDeltaAwarePassivationTest issue yet as it only is reproducible in a full maven run with all the tests.
> Tests from org.infinispan.atomic package fail with AssertionError
> -----------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: ISPN-3364
> URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/ISPN-3364
> Project: Infinispan
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: Core API
> Affects Versions: 6.0.0.Alpha1
> Environment: RHEL5_x86, RHEL5_x86_64, RHEL6_x86, RHEL5_x86_64 with IBM JDK7
> Reporter: Vitalii Chepeliuk
> Assignee: William Burns
> Labels: 620
> Attachments: LocalDeltaAwarePassivationTest.log.zip, ReplDeltaAwarePassivationTest.log.zip
>
>
> Following tests fail from org.infinispan.atomic package
> org.infinispan.atomic.LocalDeltaAwarePassivationTest.testAtomicMap
> org.infinispan.atomic.LocalDeltaAwarePassivationTest.testDeltaAware
> org.infinispan.atomic.LocalDeltaAwarePassivationTest.testFineGrainedAtomicMap
> org.infinispan.atomic.ReplDeltaAwarePassivationTest.testAtomicMap
> org.infinispan.atomic.ReplDeltaAwarePassivationTest.testAtomicMap2
> org.infinispan.atomic.ReplDeltaAwarePassivationTest.testDeltaAware
> org.infinispan.atomic.ReplDeltaAwarePassivationTest.testDeltaAware2
> org.infinispan.atomic.ReplDeltaAwarePassivationTest.testFineGrainedAtomicMap
> org.infinispan.atomic.ReplDeltaAwarePassivationTest.testFineGrainedAtomicMap2
> Add link on jenkins job https://jenkins.mw.lab.eng.bos.redhat.com/hudson/view/JDG/view/FUNC/job/e...
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
10 years, 5 months