[JBoss JIRA] (ISPN-4556) Bump JSR 107 Dependency
by Ryan Dunckel (JIRA)
[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/ISPN-4556?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.... ]
Ryan Dunckel updated ISPN-4556:
-------------------------------
Description: Since JSR-107 has gone final, and Infinispan 7 hasn't been released yet, Infinispan 6 should bump its dep on javax.cache|cache-api from 1.0.0-PFD to 1.0.0. (was: Since JSR-107 has gone final, and Infinispan 7 hasn't been release yet, Infinispan 6 should bump its dep on javax.cache|cache-api from 1.0.0-PFD to 1.0.0.)
> Bump JSR 107 Dependency
> -----------------------
>
> Key: ISPN-4556
> URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/ISPN-4556
> Project: Infinispan
> Issue Type: Task
> Security Level: Public(Everyone can see)
> Components: JCache
> Affects Versions: 6.0.2.Final
> Reporter: Ryan Dunckel
> Assignee: Mircea Markus
> Priority: Minor
>
> Since JSR-107 has gone final, and Infinispan 7 hasn't been released yet, Infinispan 6 should bump its dep on javax.cache|cache-api from 1.0.0-PFD to 1.0.0.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.2.6#6264)
10 years, 5 months
[JBoss JIRA] (ISPN-4556) Bump JSR 107 Dependency
by Ryan Dunckel (JIRA)
Ryan Dunckel created ISPN-4556:
----------------------------------
Summary: Bump JSR 107 Dependency
Key: ISPN-4556
URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/ISPN-4556
Project: Infinispan
Issue Type: Task
Security Level: Public (Everyone can see)
Components: JCache
Affects Versions: 6.0.2.Final
Reporter: Ryan Dunckel
Assignee: Mircea Markus
Priority: Minor
Since JSR-107 has gone final, and Infinispan 7 hasn't been release yet, Infinispan 6 should bump its dep on javax.cache|cache-api from 1.0.0-PFD to 1.0.0.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.2.6#6264)
10 years, 5 months
[JBoss JIRA] (ISPN-4554) Cache RpcOptions objects in TxDistributionInterceptor
by Dan Berindei (JIRA)
[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/ISPN-4554?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.... ]
Dan Berindei resolved ISPN-4554.
--------------------------------
Resolution: Rejected
Looks like there is a reason not to cache the RpcOptions objects: the replication timeout setting is mutable at runtime.
> Cache RpcOptions objects in TxDistributionInterceptor
> -----------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: ISPN-4554
> URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/ISPN-4554
> Project: Infinispan
> Issue Type: Task
> Security Level: Public(Everyone can see)
> Components: Core
> Affects Versions: 7.0.0.Alpha5
> Reporter: Dan Berindei
> Assignee: Dan Berindei
> Priority: Minor
> Fix For: 7.0.0.Beta1
>
>
> The cost of creating a new RpcOptionsBuilder + RpcOptions instance should be trivial, but still there's no reason to do it.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.2.6#6264)
10 years, 5 months
[JBoss JIRA] (ISPN-3937) Investigate the memory usage of JDBC cache stores when processing a large result set
by Dan Berindei (JIRA)
[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/ISPN-3937?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.... ]
Dan Berindei commented on ISPN-3937:
------------------------------------
Setting the result set type and concurrency shouldn't be a problem.
Are you worried about the lock on the table being held while we are processing the results? {{process()}} doesn't do that much work on the caller's thread, so our iteration over the result set should be only slightly slower than the driver's fetching of the entire result set.
> Investigate the memory usage of JDBC cache stores when processing a large result set
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: ISPN-3937
> URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/ISPN-3937
> Project: Infinispan
> Issue Type: Task
> Security Level: Public(Everyone can see)
> Components: Core, Loaders and Stores
> Affects Versions: 6.0.0.Final
> Reporter: Dan Berindei
> Assignee: Pedro Ruivo
> Priority: Critical
> Fix For: 7.0.0.Final
>
>
> Iterating over a huge ResultSet with MySQL seems to keep all the rows in memory: https://community.jboss.org/message/854402
> We should investigate whether we can limit the memory usage to a fixed amount and whether this affects other drivers as well.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.2.6#6264)
10 years, 5 months