June 2016 - infinispan-issues - Jboss List Archives

[JBoss JIRA] (ISPN-6225) Allow the ratio segments/shard to be configurable for the ShardIndexManager

by Gustavo Fernandes (JIRA)

[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/ISPN-6225?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.... ] Gustavo Fernandes reassigned ISPN-6225: --------------------------------------- Assignee: Gustavo Fernandes > Allow the ratio segments/shard to be configurable for the ShardIndexManager > --------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: ISPN-6225 > URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/ISPN-6225 > Project: Infinispan > Issue Type: Enhancement > Reporter: Gustavo Fernandes > Assignee: Gustavo Fernandes > > Currently it's fixed on 1:1 meaning every Infinispan segment will create a shard -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.4.11#64026)

8 years, 6 months

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss JIRA] (IPROTO-6) Allow repetable protobuf doc comment annotations

by Adrian Nistor (JIRA)

[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/IPROTO-6?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.s... ] Adrian Nistor reassigned IPROTO-6: ---------------------------------- Assignee: Adrian Nistor > Allow repetable protobuf doc comment annotations > ------------------------------------------------ > > Key: IPROTO-6 > URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/IPROTO-6 > Project: Infinispan ProtoStream > Issue Type: Enhancement > Reporter: Adrian Nistor > Assignee: Adrian Nistor > Fix For: 4.0.0.Alpha1, 4.0.0.Final > > > Similarly to java 8 (see example here: https://github.com/shekhargulati/java8-the-missing-tutorial/blob/master/1...), we should allow repeatable protobuf doc comment annotations. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.4.11#64026)

8 years, 6 months

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss JIRA] (IPROTO-6) Allow repetable protobuf doc comment annotations

by Adrian Nistor (JIRA)

[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/IPROTO-6?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.s... ] Adrian Nistor updated IPROTO-6: ------------------------------- Fix Version/s: 4.0.0.Alpha1 4.0.0.Final > Allow repetable protobuf doc comment annotations > ------------------------------------------------ > > Key: IPROTO-6 > URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/IPROTO-6 > Project: Infinispan ProtoStream > Issue Type: Enhancement > Reporter: Adrian Nistor > Assignee: Adrian Nistor > Fix For: 4.0.0.Alpha1, 4.0.0.Final > > > Similarly to java 8 (see example here: https://github.com/shekhargulati/java8-the-missing-tutorial/blob/master/1...), we should allow repeatable protobuf doc comment annotations. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.4.11#64026)

8 years, 6 months

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss JIRA] (IPROTO-6) Allow repetable protobuf doc comment annotations

by Adrian Nistor (JIRA)

[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/IPROTO-6?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.s... ] Adrian Nistor updated IPROTO-6: ------------------------------- Status: Open (was: New) > Allow repetable protobuf doc comment annotations > ------------------------------------------------ > > Key: IPROTO-6 > URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/IPROTO-6 > Project: Infinispan ProtoStream > Issue Type: Enhancement > Reporter: Adrian Nistor > Fix For: 4.0.0.Alpha1, 4.0.0.Final > > > Similarly to java 8 (see example here: https://github.com/shekhargulati/java8-the-missing-tutorial/blob/master/1...), we should allow repeatable protobuf doc comment annotations. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.4.11#64026)

8 years, 6 months

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss JIRA] (IPROTO-6) Allow repetable protobuf doc comment annotations

by Adrian Nistor (JIRA)

Adrian Nistor created IPROTO-6: ---------------------------------- Summary: Allow repetable protobuf doc comment annotations Key: IPROTO-6 URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/IPROTO-6 Project: Infinispan ProtoStream Issue Type: Enhancement Reporter: Adrian Nistor Similarly to java 8 (see example here: https://github.com/shekhargulati/java8-the-missing-tutorial/blob/master/1...), we should allow repeatable protobuf doc comment annotations. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.4.11#64026)

8 years, 6 months

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss JIRA] (ISPN-4149) Inject version details into org.infinispan.Version during build

by Sanne Grinovero (JIRA)

[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/ISPN-4149?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.... ] Sanne Grinovero reassigned ISPN-4149: ------------------------------------- Assignee: Tristan Tarrant > Inject version details into org.infinispan.Version during build > --------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: ISPN-4149 > URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/ISPN-4149 > Project: Infinispan > Issue Type: Task > Components: Build process > Reporter: Sanne Grinovero > Assignee: Tristan Tarrant > Priority: Minor > -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.4.11#64026)

8 years, 6 months

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss JIRA] (ISPN-6797) Evaluate if using compression is a good idea

by Sebastian Łaskawiec (JIRA)

[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/ISPN-6797?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.... ] Sebastian Łaskawiec commented on ISPN-6797: ------------------------------------------- At this stage it's a brainstorm ticket... If you think it's worth to evaluate them also, a big +1 from me. > Evaluate if using compression is a good idea > -------------------------------------------- > > Key: ISPN-6797 > URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/ISPN-6797 > Project: Infinispan > Issue Type: Feature Request > Reporter: Sebastian Łaskawiec > Assignee: Sebastian Łaskawiec > Priority: Trivial > > Currently we don't use any compression when sending data over the wire (client/server mode). The [latest compression benchmark|http://java-performance.info/performance-general-compression/] looks very promising (especially Lz4). We could re-evaluate it's usage in Infinispan. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.4.11#64026)

8 years, 6 months

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss JIRA] (ISPN-6797) Evaluate if using compression is a good idea

by Dan Berindei (JIRA)

[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/ISPN-6797?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.... ] Dan Berindei commented on ISPN-6797: ------------------------------------ Is this issue specific to HotRod, or do you plan to evaluate compression for RPCs/storeAsBinary/persistence as well? > Evaluate if using compression is a good idea > -------------------------------------------- > > Key: ISPN-6797 > URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/ISPN-6797 > Project: Infinispan > Issue Type: Feature Request > Reporter: Sebastian Łaskawiec > Assignee: Sebastian Łaskawiec > Priority: Trivial > > Currently we don't use any compression when sending data over the wire (client/server mode). The [latest compression benchmark|http://java-performance.info/performance-general-compression/] looks very promising (especially Lz4). We could re-evaluate it's usage in Infinispan. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.4.11#64026)

8 years, 6 months

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss JIRA] (ISPN-6797) Evaluate if using compression is a good idea

by Sebastian Łaskawiec (JIRA)

Sebastian Łaskawiec created ISPN-6797: ----------------------------------------- Summary: Evaluate if using compression is a good idea Key: ISPN-6797 URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/ISPN-6797 Project: Infinispan Issue Type: Feature Request Reporter: Sebastian Łaskawiec Assignee: Sebastian Łaskawiec Priority: Trivial Currently we don't use any compression when sending data over the wire (client/server mode). The [latest compression benchmark|http://java-performance.info/performance-general-compression/] looks very promising (especially Lz4). We could re-evaluate it's usage in Infinispan. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.4.11#64026)

8 years, 6 months

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss JIRA] (ISPN-6627) ClusteredScriptingTest.testDistributedMapReduceStreamWithFlag fails on Windows

by Anna Manukyan (JIRA)

[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/ISPN-6627?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.... ] Anna Manukyan updated ISPN-6627: -------------------------------- Status: Open (was: New) > ClusteredScriptingTest.testDistributedMapReduceStreamWithFlag fails on Windows > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > Key: ISPN-6627 > URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/ISPN-6627 > Project: Infinispan > Issue Type: Bug > Affects Versions: 9.0.0.Alpha1 > Environment: * Windows CI machine > Reporter: Sebastian Łaskawiec > Assignee: Anna Manukyan > > {{ClusteredScriptingTest.testDistributedMapReduceStreamWithFlag}} tests fail on Windows CI. > Link: http://ci.infinispan.org/viewLog.html?buildId=39675&tab=buildResultsDiv&b... > Stacktrace: > {noformat} > ======= Failed test run #1 ========== > java.lang.AssertionError: expected:<3209> but was:<3207> > at org.testng.AssertJUnit.fail(AssertJUnit.java:59) > at org.testng.AssertJUnit.failNotEquals(AssertJUnit.java:364) > at org.testng.AssertJUnit.assertEquals(AssertJUnit.java:80) > at org.testng.AssertJUnit.assertEquals(AssertJUnit.java:245) > at org.testng.AssertJUnit.assertEquals(AssertJUnit.java:252) > at org.infinispan.scripting.ClusteredScriptingTest$6.call(ClusteredScriptingTest.java:140) > at org.infinispan.test.TestingUtil.withCacheManagers(TestingUtil.java:1314) > at org.infinispan.scripting.ClusteredScriptingTest.testDistributedMapReduceStreamWithFlag(ClusteredScriptingTest.java:127) > at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method) > at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:62) > at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:43) > at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:498) > at org.testng.internal.MethodInvocationHelper.invokeMethod(MethodInvocationHelper.java:84) > at org.testng.internal.Invoker.invokeMethod(Invoker.java:714) > at org.testng.internal.Invoker.invokeTestMethod(Invoker.java:901) > at org.testng.internal.Invoker.invokeTestMethods(Invoker.java:1231) > at org.testng.internal.TestMethodWorker.invokeTestMethods(TestMethodWorker.java:127) > at org.testng.internal.TestMethodWorker.run(TestMethodWorker.java:111) > at org.testng.TestRunner.privateRun(TestRunner.java:767) > at org.testng.TestRunner.run(TestRunner.java:617) > at org.testng.SuiteRunner.runTest(SuiteRunner.java:348) > at org.testng.SuiteRunner.access$000(SuiteRunner.java:38) > at org.testng.SuiteRunner$SuiteWorker.run(SuiteRunner.java:382) > at org.testng.internal.thread.ThreadUtil$2.call(ThreadUtil.java:64) > at java.util.concurrent.FutureTask.run(FutureTask.java:266) > at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1142) > at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:617) > at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:745) > ------- Stdout: ------- > [TestSuiteProgress] Test starting: org.infinispan.scripting.ClusteredScriptingTest.testDistributedMapReduceStreamWithFlag > [TestSuiteProgress] Test failed: org.infinispan.scripting.ClusteredScriptingTest.testDistributedMapReduceStreamWithFlag > 20:17:53,722 ERROR (testng-ClusteredScriptingTest) [TestSuiteProgress] Test failed: org.infinispan.scripting.ClusteredScriptingTest.testDistributedMapReduceStreamWithFlag > java.lang.AssertionError: expected:<3209> but was:<3207> > at org.testng.AssertJUnit.fail(AssertJUnit.java:59) > at org.testng.AssertJUnit.failNotEquals(AssertJUnit.java:364) > at org.testng.AssertJUnit.assertEquals(AssertJUnit.java:80) > at org.testng.AssertJUnit.assertEquals(AssertJUnit.java:245) > at org.testng.AssertJUnit.assertEquals(AssertJUnit.java:252) > at org.infinispan.scripting.ClusteredScriptingTest$6.call(ClusteredScriptingTest.java:140) > at org.infinispan.test.TestingUtil.withCacheManagers(TestingUtil.java:1314) > at org.infinispan.scripting.ClusteredScriptingTest.testDistributedMapReduceStreamWithFlag(ClusteredScriptingTest.java:127) > at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)[TestSuiteProgress] Tests succeeded: 55, failed: 2, skipped: 0 > ======= Failed test run #2 ========== > java.lang.AssertionError: expected:<3209> but was:<3207> > at org.testng.AssertJUnit.fail(AssertJUnit.java:59) > at org.testng.AssertJUnit.failNotEquals(AssertJUnit.java:364) > at org.testng.AssertJUnit.assertEquals(AssertJUnit.java:80) > at org.testng.AssertJUnit.assertEquals(AssertJUnit.java:245) > at org.testng.AssertJUnit.assertEquals(AssertJUnit.java:252) > at org.infinispan.scripting.ClusteredScriptingTest$6.call(ClusteredScriptingTest.java:140) > at org.infinispan.test.TestingUtil.withCacheManagers(TestingUtil.java:1314) > at org.infinispan.scripting.ClusteredScriptingTest.testDistributedMapReduceStreamWithFlag(ClusteredScriptingTest.java:127) > at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method) > at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:62) > at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:43) > at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:498) > at org.testng.internal.MethodInvocationHelper.invokeMethod(MethodInvocationHelper.java:84) > at org.testng.internal.Invoker.invokeMethod(Invoker.java:714) > at org.testng.internal.Invoker.invokeTestMethod(Invoker.java:901) > at org.testng.internal.Invoker.invokeTestMethods(Invoker.java:1231) > at org.testng.internal.TestMethodWorker.invokeTestMethods(TestMethodWorker.java:127) > at org.testng.internal.TestMethodWorker.run(TestMethodWorker.java:111) > at org.testng.TestRunner.privateRun(TestRunner.java:767) > at org.testng.TestRunner.run(TestRunner.java:617) > at org.testng.SuiteRunner.runTest(SuiteRunner.java:348) > at org.testng.SuiteRunner.access$000(SuiteRunner.java:38) > at org.testng.SuiteRunner$SuiteWorker.run(SuiteRunner.java:382) > at org.testng.internal.thread.ThreadUtil$2.call(ThreadUtil.java:64) > at java.util.concurrent.FutureTask.run(FutureTask.java:266) > at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1142) > at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:617) > at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:745) > ------- Stdout: ------- > [TestSuiteProgress] Test starting: org.infinispan.scripting.ClusteredScriptingTest.testDistributedMapReduceStreamWithFlag > [TestSuiteProgress] Test failed: org.infinispan.scripting.ClusteredScriptingTest.testDistributedMapReduceStreamWithFlag > 20:17:54,545 ERROR (testng-ClusteredScriptingTest) [TestSuiteProgress] Test failed: org.infinispan.scripting.ClusteredScriptingTest.testDistributedMapReduceStreamWithFlag > java.lang.AssertionError: expected:<3209> but was:<3207> > at org.testng.AssertJUnit.fail(AssertJUnit.java:59) > at org.testng.AssertJUnit.failNotEquals(AssertJUnit.java:364) > at org.testng.AssertJUnit.assertEquals(AssertJUnit.java:80) > at org.testng.AssertJUnit.assertEquals(AssertJUnit.java:245) > at org.testng.AssertJUnit.assertEquals(AssertJUnit.java:252) > at org.infinispan.scripting.ClusteredScriptingTest$6.call(ClusteredScriptingTest.java:140) > at org.infinispan.test.TestingUtil.withCacheManagers(TestingUtil.java:1314) > at org.infinispan.scripting.ClusteredScriptingTest.testDistributedMapReduceStreamWithFlag(ClusteredScriptingTest.java:127) > at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)[TestSuiteProgress] Tests succeeded: 55, failed: 3, skipped: 0 > {noformat} -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.4.11#64026)

8 years, 6 months

1
0
0 / 0

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

infinispan-issues June 2016