June 2016 - infinispan-issues - Jboss List Archives

[JBoss JIRA] (ISPN-6732) XML serializer does not serialize properly async, l1 and site tags

by Anna Manukyan (JIRA)

[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/ISPN-6732?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.... ] Anna Manukyan updated ISPN-6732: -------------------------------- Status: Open (was: New) > XML serializer does not serialize properly async, l1 and site tags > ------------------------------------------------------------------ > > Key: ISPN-6732 > URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/ISPN-6732 > Project: Infinispan > Issue Type: Bug > Components: Configuration > Reporter: Anna Manukyan > Assignee: Anna Manukyan > > 1. The {{async}} element of the singleFile or store tag is enabled in the serialized XML, even if it is disabled in 6.0 config xml. Empty {{write-behind}} tag appears which enables the async for the store. > 2. The {{l1}} tag is not serialized to new version. > 3.The global {{site}} element is not serialized to new version. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.4.11#64026)

9 years, 9 months

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss JIRA] (ISPN-5326) JSR-107 Support for exception-handling annotation properties

by Matej Čimbora (JIRA)

[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/ISPN-5326?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.... ] Matej Čimbora reassigned ISPN-5326: ----------------------------------- Assignee: (was: Matej Čimbora) > JSR-107 Support for exception-handling annotation properties > ------------------------------------------------------------ > > Key: ISPN-5326 > URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/ISPN-5326 > Project: Infinispan > Issue Type: Enhancement > Components: JCache > Reporter: Matej Čimbora > > The following JSR-107 annotation properties are currently not yet supported. > CacheResult - cachedExceptions, exceptionCacheName, nonCachedExceptions > CachePut - cacheFor, noCacheFor > CacheRemove - evictFor, noEvictFor > CacheRemoveAll - evictFor, noEvictFor > Note: Not covered by TCK tests. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.4.11#64026)

9 years, 9 months

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss JIRA] (ISPN-6225) Allow the ratio segments/shard to be configurable for the ShardIndexManager

by Gustavo Fernandes (JIRA)

[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/ISPN-6225?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.... ] Gustavo Fernandes reassigned ISPN-6225: --------------------------------------- Assignee: Gustavo Fernandes > Allow the ratio segments/shard to be configurable for the ShardIndexManager > --------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: ISPN-6225 > URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/ISPN-6225 > Project: Infinispan > Issue Type: Enhancement > Reporter: Gustavo Fernandes > Assignee: Gustavo Fernandes > > Currently it's fixed on 1:1 meaning every Infinispan segment will create a shard -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.4.11#64026)

9 years, 9 months

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss JIRA] (IPROTO-6) Allow repetable protobuf doc comment annotations

by Adrian Nistor (JIRA)

[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/IPROTO-6?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.s... ] Adrian Nistor reassigned IPROTO-6: ---------------------------------- Assignee: Adrian Nistor > Allow repetable protobuf doc comment annotations > ------------------------------------------------ > > Key: IPROTO-6 > URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/IPROTO-6 > Project: Infinispan ProtoStream > Issue Type: Enhancement > Reporter: Adrian Nistor > Assignee: Adrian Nistor > Fix For: 4.0.0.Alpha1, 4.0.0.Final > > > Similarly to java 8 (see example here: https://github.com/shekhargulati/java8-the-missing-tutorial/blob/master/1...), we should allow repeatable protobuf doc comment annotations. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.4.11#64026)

9 years, 9 months

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss JIRA] (IPROTO-6) Allow repetable protobuf doc comment annotations

by Adrian Nistor (JIRA)

[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/IPROTO-6?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.s... ] Adrian Nistor updated IPROTO-6: ------------------------------- Fix Version/s: 4.0.0.Alpha1 4.0.0.Final > Allow repetable protobuf doc comment annotations > ------------------------------------------------ > > Key: IPROTO-6 > URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/IPROTO-6 > Project: Infinispan ProtoStream > Issue Type: Enhancement > Reporter: Adrian Nistor > Assignee: Adrian Nistor > Fix For: 4.0.0.Alpha1, 4.0.0.Final > > > Similarly to java 8 (see example here: https://github.com/shekhargulati/java8-the-missing-tutorial/blob/master/1...), we should allow repeatable protobuf doc comment annotations. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.4.11#64026)

9 years, 9 months

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss JIRA] (IPROTO-6) Allow repetable protobuf doc comment annotations

by Adrian Nistor (JIRA)

[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/IPROTO-6?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.s... ] Adrian Nistor updated IPROTO-6: ------------------------------- Status: Open (was: New) > Allow repetable protobuf doc comment annotations > ------------------------------------------------ > > Key: IPROTO-6 > URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/IPROTO-6 > Project: Infinispan ProtoStream > Issue Type: Enhancement > Reporter: Adrian Nistor > Fix For: 4.0.0.Alpha1, 4.0.0.Final > > > Similarly to java 8 (see example here: https://github.com/shekhargulati/java8-the-missing-tutorial/blob/master/1...), we should allow repeatable protobuf doc comment annotations. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.4.11#64026)

9 years, 9 months

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss JIRA] (IPROTO-6) Allow repetable protobuf doc comment annotations

by Adrian Nistor (JIRA)

Adrian Nistor created IPROTO-6: ---------------------------------- Summary: Allow repetable protobuf doc comment annotations Key: IPROTO-6 URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/IPROTO-6 Project: Infinispan ProtoStream Issue Type: Enhancement Reporter: Adrian Nistor Similarly to java 8 (see example here: https://github.com/shekhargulati/java8-the-missing-tutorial/blob/master/1...), we should allow repeatable protobuf doc comment annotations. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.4.11#64026)

9 years, 9 months

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss JIRA] (ISPN-4149) Inject version details into org.infinispan.Version during build

by Sanne Grinovero (JIRA)

[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/ISPN-4149?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.... ] Sanne Grinovero reassigned ISPN-4149: ------------------------------------- Assignee: Tristan Tarrant > Inject version details into org.infinispan.Version during build > --------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: ISPN-4149 > URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/ISPN-4149 > Project: Infinispan > Issue Type: Task > Components: Build process > Reporter: Sanne Grinovero > Assignee: Tristan Tarrant > Priority: Minor > -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.4.11#64026)

9 years, 9 months

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss JIRA] (ISPN-6797) Evaluate if using compression is a good idea

by Sebastian Łaskawiec (JIRA)

[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/ISPN-6797?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.... ] Sebastian Łaskawiec commented on ISPN-6797: ------------------------------------------- At this stage it's a brainstorm ticket... If you think it's worth to evaluate them also, a big +1 from me. > Evaluate if using compression is a good idea > -------------------------------------------- > > Key: ISPN-6797 > URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/ISPN-6797 > Project: Infinispan > Issue Type: Feature Request > Reporter: Sebastian Łaskawiec > Assignee: Sebastian Łaskawiec > Priority: Trivial > > Currently we don't use any compression when sending data over the wire (client/server mode). The [latest compression benchmark|http://java-performance.info/performance-general-compression/] looks very promising (especially Lz4). We could re-evaluate it's usage in Infinispan. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.4.11#64026)

9 years, 9 months

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss JIRA] (ISPN-6797) Evaluate if using compression is a good idea

by Dan Berindei (JIRA)

[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/ISPN-6797?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.... ] Dan Berindei commented on ISPN-6797: ------------------------------------ Is this issue specific to HotRod, or do you plan to evaluate compression for RPCs/storeAsBinary/persistence as well? > Evaluate if using compression is a good idea > -------------------------------------------- > > Key: ISPN-6797 > URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/ISPN-6797 > Project: Infinispan > Issue Type: Feature Request > Reporter: Sebastian Łaskawiec > Assignee: Sebastian Łaskawiec > Priority: Trivial > > Currently we don't use any compression when sending data over the wire (client/server mode). The [latest compression benchmark|http://java-performance.info/performance-general-compression/] looks very promising (especially Lz4). We could re-evaluate it's usage in Infinispan. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.4.11#64026)

9 years, 9 months

1
0
0 / 0

2026

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

infinispan-issues June 2016