July 2017 - infinispan-issues - Jboss List Archives

[JBoss JIRA] (ISPN-7647) Administration console - eviction tab allows to set invalid options

by Vladimir Blagojevic (JIRA)

[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/ISPN-7647?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.... ] Vladimir Blagojevic commented on ISPN-7647: ------------------------------------------- [~rmacor] We don't have Eviction tab anymore. I am closing this issue as outdated. If you disagree let me know. > Administration console - eviction tab allows to set invalid options > ------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: ISPN-7647 > URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/ISPN-7647 > Project: Infinispan > Issue Type: Bug > Components: Console > Affects Versions: 9.0.0.CR3 > Reporter: Roman Macor > Assignee: Vladimir Blagojevic > > The only valid option for memory based eviction is LRU. However, the console allows the user to set any eviction strategy which results in error after server restart: > org.infinispan.commons.CacheConfigurationException: Eviction cannot use memory based approximation with LIRS > I suggest we select LRU strategy and disable the dropdown when memory is set as an eviction type. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.2.3#72005)

8 years, 8 months

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss JIRA] (ISPN-7647) Administration console - eviction tab allows to set invalid options

by Vladimir Blagojevic (JIRA)

[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/ISPN-7647?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.... ] Vladimir Blagojevic resolved ISPN-7647. --------------------------------------- Resolution: Won't Fix > Administration console - eviction tab allows to set invalid options > ------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: ISPN-7647 > URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/ISPN-7647 > Project: Infinispan > Issue Type: Bug > Components: Console > Affects Versions: 9.0.0.CR3 > Reporter: Roman Macor > Assignee: Vladimir Blagojevic > > The only valid option for memory based eviction is LRU. However, the console allows the user to set any eviction strategy which results in error after server restart: > org.infinispan.commons.CacheConfigurationException: Eviction cannot use memory based approximation with LIRS > I suggest we select LRU strategy and disable the dropdown when memory is set as an eviction type. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.2.3#72005)

8 years, 8 months

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss JIRA] (ISPN-7979) Include all component licenses in distributions

by Adrian Nistor (JIRA)

[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/ISPN-7979?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.... ] Adrian Nistor updated ISPN-7979: -------------------------------- Git Pull Request: https://github.com/infinispan/infinispan/pull/5230 (was: https://github.com/infinispan/infinispan/pull/5230, https://issues.jboss.org/browse/ISPN-7979) > Include all component licenses in distributions > ----------------------------------------------- > > Key: ISPN-7979 > URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/ISPN-7979 > Project: Infinispan > Issue Type: Task > Components: Build process > Reporter: Tristan Tarrant > Assignee: Tristan Tarrant > Priority: Blocker > Fix For: 9.2.0.Final > > > The distributions should include licenses for all components -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.2.3#72005)

8 years, 8 months

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss JIRA] (ISPN-7722) NPE in LocalTopologyManagerImpl when undeploying an application

by Alexis NICOLAS (JIRA)

[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/ISPN-7722?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.... ] Alexis NICOLAS commented on ISPN-7722: -------------------------------------- This bug report didn't receive any attention for a long time, does that mean that it is invalid and that it is a configuration issue? Should I provide more information? > NPE in LocalTopologyManagerImpl when undeploying an application > --------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: ISPN-7722 > URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/ISPN-7722 > Project: Infinispan > Issue Type: Bug > Components: Core > Affects Versions: 9.0.0.Final > Environment: JBoss 6.3.3.GA & Tomcat 8.5.8 > Reporter: Alexis NICOLAS > > When undeploying an application using Infinispan configured with global state disabled from an application server you get the following error: > {code} > 2017-04-12 15:54:28.617 WARN o.i.t.CacheTopologyControlCommand:165 - ISPN000071: Caught exception when handling command CacheTopologyControlCommand{cache=XXXXX, type=SHUTDOWN_PERFORM, sender=null, joinInfo=null, topologyId=0, rebalanceId=0, currentCH=null, pendingCH=null, availabilityMode=null, actualMembers=null, throwable=null, viewId=0} > java.lang.NullPointerException: null > at org.infinispan.topology.LocalTopologyManagerImpl.handleCacheShutdown(LocalTopologyManagerImpl.java:655) > at org.infinispan.topology.CacheTopologyControlCommand.doPerform(CacheTopologyControlCommand.java:204) > at org.infinispan.topology.CacheTopologyControlCommand.invokeAsync(CacheTopologyControlCommand.java:159) > at org.infinispan.remoting.inboundhandler.GlobalInboundInvocationHandler.invokeReplicableCommand(GlobalInboundInvocationHandler.java:173) > at org.infinispan.remoting.inboundhandler.GlobalInboundInvocationHandler.runReplicableCommand(GlobalInboundInvocationHandler.java:154) > at org.infinispan.remoting.inboundhandler.GlobalInboundInvocationHandler.lambda$handleReplicableCommand$1(GlobalInboundInvocationHandler.java:148) > at org.infinispan.util.concurrent.BlockingTaskAwareExecutorServiceImpl$RunnableWrapper.run(BlockingTaskAwareExecutorServiceImpl.java:203) > at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1142) > at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:617) > at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:745) > {code} > It seems to be that in the method handleCacheShutdown(...) method of LocalTopologyManagerImpl a test whether globalStateManager is null is missing. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.2.3#72005)

8 years, 8 months

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss JIRA] (ISPN-7932) JCache EntryProcesor not working for replicated cache

by Miljenko Brkic (JIRA)

[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/ISPN-7932?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.... ] Miljenko Brkic commented on ISPN-7932: -------------------------------------- Hi, any plans to take a look at this anytime soon, this is a showstopper for using Infinispan on the project? > JCache EntryProcesor not working for replicated cache > ----------------------------------------------------- > > Key: ISPN-7932 > URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/ISPN-7932 > Project: Infinispan > Issue Type: Bug > Components: JCache > Affects Versions: 9.0.1.Final > Environment: Ubuntu Linux 4.4.0-79-generic x86_64 > java version "1.8.0_131" > Java(TM) SE Runtime Environment (build 1.8.0_131-b11) > Java HotSpot(TM) 64-Bit Server VM (build 25.131-b11, mixed mode) > Reporter: Miljenko Brkic > Assignee: Galder Zamarreño > Attachments: jcache.tar.gz > > > Cached value updated via EntryProcessor is not updated in replicated cache. > Please find attached test application to reproduce the problem. Two instances of application increment cached value, but for one instance new value is not put in the cache (see steps to reproduce). -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.2.3#72005)

8 years, 8 months

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss JIRA] (ISPN-7887) CacheMultimap over Hot Rod

by Katia Aresti (JIRA)

[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/ISPN-7887?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.... ] Katia Aresti updated ISPN-7887: ------------------------------- Status: Open (was: New) > CacheMultimap over Hot Rod > -------------------------- > > Key: ISPN-7887 > URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/ISPN-7887 > Project: Infinispan > Issue Type: Feature Request > Components: Remote Protocols > Reporter: Tristan Tarrant > Assignee: Katia Aresti > -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.2.3#72005)

8 years, 8 months

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss JIRA] (ISPN-4340) Automatically setup shared indexes when indexing is enabled

by Tristan Tarrant (JIRA)

[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/ISPN-4340?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.... ] Tristan Tarrant updated ISPN-4340: ---------------------------------- Fix Version/s: 9.2.0.Final (was: 9.1.0.Final) > Automatically setup shared indexes when indexing is enabled > ----------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: ISPN-4340 > URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/ISPN-4340 > Project: Infinispan > Issue Type: Feature Request > Components: Embedded Querying > Reporter: Sanne Grinovero > Assignee: Gustavo Fernandes > Labels: 64QueryBlockers > Fix For: 9.2.0.Final > > > - on replicated Caches, we should create a default index on a FSDirectory and provide some appropriate default tuning, for example enabling NRT. > - distributed Caches will need the Infinispan Directory (shared) and a master/slave backend (Infinispan IndexManager, while NRT is not compatible in this case) > We want to keep the properties configuration structure as well as an "advanced tuning" and override capabilities of the default choices. > Some more common options like sync/async indexing should probably be promoted to be controlled by the XML elements and configuration DSL excplicitly. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.2.3#72005)

8 years, 9 months

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss JIRA] (ISPN-4286) Two concurrent putIfAbsent operations can both return null during rebalance

by Tristan Tarrant (JIRA)

[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/ISPN-4286?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.... ] Tristan Tarrant updated ISPN-4286: ---------------------------------- Fix Version/s: 9.2.0.Final (was: 9.1.0.Final) > Two concurrent putIfAbsent operations can both return null during rebalance > --------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: ISPN-4286 > URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/ISPN-4286 > Project: Infinispan > Issue Type: Bug > Components: Core, State Transfer > Affects Versions: 6.0.2.Final > Reporter: Dan Berindei > Assignee: Dan Berindei > Priority: Critical > Labels: consistency > Fix For: 9.2.0.Final > > > If the cache topology changes while executing a putIfAbsent operation, the old primary owner will throw an OutdatedTopologyException, and the originator will retry on the new owner. > When retrying the PutKeyValueCommand on the new primary owner, we compare the current value with the command's new value. If they are equal, we assume that the initial command wrote the old value, and we return {{null}}. > However, the value might have been written by another putIfAbsent operation. So we could have two {{putIfAbsent(k, v)}} operations, both returning {{null}}. > {code} > A is the originator, B is the primary owner, k = null > A -> B: putIfAbsent(k, v1) > B dies before writing v, C is now primary owner > D -> C: putIfAbsent(k, v1) // another put operation from D, with the same value > C -> D: null // correct > A -> C: retry_putIfAbsent(k, v1) > C -> A: null // C assumes A is overwriting its own value, so it's also returning null > {code} -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.2.3#72005)

8 years, 9 months

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss JIRA] (ISPN-4159) DefaultTwoWayKey2StringMapper encodes objects to strings in a manner that is incompatible with string handling of some databases

by Tristan Tarrant (JIRA)

[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/ISPN-4159?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.... ] Tristan Tarrant updated ISPN-4159: ---------------------------------- Fix Version/s: 9.2.0.Final (was: 9.1.0.Final) > DefaultTwoWayKey2StringMapper encodes objects to strings in a manner that is incompatible with string handling of some databases > -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: ISPN-4159 > URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/ISPN-4159 > Project: Infinispan > Issue Type: Bug > Components: Loaders and Stores > Affects Versions: 6.0.0.Final > Reporter: Adrian Nistor > Assignee: Ryan Emerson > Fix For: 9.2.0.Final > > > DefaultTwoWayKey2StringMapper uses two neat tricks. > 1. it does not encode all supported types, it only encodes non-Strings. Strings are kept unmodified. > 2. it uses a special prefix (unicode char 0xfeff) to mark which strings were encoded and which are plain. > Unfortunately some databases, notably MySql, interpret the endianness mark (0xfeff, 0xfffe), convert to native byte order and then drop it. > This leaves us with no clue the string is not an actual String but an encoded representation of another type. This misinterpretation leads later to ClassCastExceptions in various places in core and user code. > Proposed fix: get rid of #1 and #2 optimisations. Encode all objects, including Strings and always use the ?n prefix (where n stands for the original type). Drop the 0xFEFF marker prefix. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.2.3#72005)

8 years, 9 months

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss JIRA] (ISPN-3918) Inconsistent view of the cache with putIfAbsent in a non-tx cache during state transfer

by Tristan Tarrant (JIRA)

[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/ISPN-3918?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.... ] Tristan Tarrant updated ISPN-3918: ---------------------------------- Fix Version/s: 9.2.0.Final (was: 9.1.0.Final) > Inconsistent view of the cache with putIfAbsent in a non-tx cache during state transfer > --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: ISPN-3918 > URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/ISPN-3918 > Project: Infinispan > Issue Type: Bug > Components: Core, State Transfer > Affects Versions: 6.0.0.Final > Reporter: Dan Berindei > Labels: consistency > Fix For: 9.2.0.Final > > Attachments: ntpiadjst.log.gz > > > In a non-tx cache, sometimes it's possible for a {{get(k)}} to return {{null}} even though a previous {{putIfAbsent(k, v)}} returned a non-null value and the only concurrent operations on the cache are concurrent putIfAbsent calls. > Say \[B, A, C] are the owners of k (C just joined) > 1. A starts a {{putIfAbsent(k, v1)}} command, sends it to B > 2. B forwards the command to A and C > 3. C writes {{k=v1}} > 4. C becomes the primary owner of k (owners are now \[C, A]) > 5. A/B see the new topology before committing and throw an outdatedTopologyException > 6. A retries the command, sends it to C > 7. C forwards the command to A, which writes {{k=v1}} > 8. C doesn't have to update the entry, returns null > If, between steps 3 and 7, another thread on A starts a {{putIfAbsent(k, v2)}} command, the command will fail and return {{v1}} (because the primary owner already has a value). However, a subsequent {{get(k)}} command will return {{null}}, because A is an owner and doesn't have the value. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.2.3#72005)

8 years, 9 months

1
0
0 / 0

2026

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

infinispan-issues July 2017