July 2017 - infinispan-issues - Jboss List Archives

[JBoss JIRA] (ISPN-8061) Upgrade to Hibernate Search 5.8.0.Beta4 : SPI cleanup

by Sanne Grinovero (JIRA)

[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/ISPN-8061?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.... ] Sanne Grinovero updated ISPN-8061: ---------------------------------- Status: Open (was: New) > Upgrade to Hibernate Search 5.8.0.Beta4 : SPI cleanup > ----------------------------------------------------- > > Key: ISPN-8061 > URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/ISPN-8061 > Project: Infinispan > Issue Type: Component Upgrade > Components: Embedded Querying > Reporter: Sanne Grinovero > Assignee: Sanne Grinovero > Fix For: 9.1.0.Final > > > This upgrade of Hibernate Search is very minor in terms of functionality, but represents an important milestone towards using the new SPI. > Many of the deprecated methods used by Infinispan in the past have been removed, so I will recommend to upgrade to maintain compatibility with further releases of this generation. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.2.3#72005)

7 years, 2 months

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss JIRA] (ISPN-7973) Investigate Service Brokers

by Sebastian Łaskawiec (JIRA)

[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/ISPN-7973?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.... ] Sebastian Łaskawiec commented on ISPN-7973: ------------------------------------------- OpenShift manual for this: https://docs.openshift.org/latest/dev_guide/templates.html#writing-exposi... > Investigate Service Brokers > --------------------------- > > Key: ISPN-7973 > URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/ISPN-7973 > Project: Infinispan > Issue Type: Feature Request > Components: Cloud Integrations > Reporter: Sebastian Łaskawiec > Assignee: Sebastian Łaskawiec > -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.2.3#72005)

7 years, 2 months

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss JIRA] (ISPN-8060) Remove indexed entity autodetection

by Adrian Nistor (JIRA)

Adrian Nistor created ISPN-8060: ----------------------------------- Summary: Remove indexed entity autodetection Key: ISPN-8060 URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/ISPN-8060 Project: Infinispan Issue Type: Enhancement Components: Embedded Querying, Remote Querying Reporter: Adrian Nistor Fix For: 10.0.0.Final All indexed types should be predeclared. Existing tests for autodetection should be converted into tests that prove autodetection is no longer supported. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.2.3#72005)

7 years, 2 months

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss JIRA] (ISPN-8060) Remove indexed entity autodetection

by Adrian Nistor (JIRA)

[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/ISPN-8060?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.... ] Adrian Nistor updated ISPN-8060: -------------------------------- Status: Open (was: New) > Remove indexed entity autodetection > ----------------------------------- > > Key: ISPN-8060 > URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/ISPN-8060 > Project: Infinispan > Issue Type: Enhancement > Components: Embedded Querying, Remote Querying > Reporter: Adrian Nistor > Fix For: 10.0.0.Final > > > All indexed types should be predeclared. > Existing tests for autodetection should be converted into tests that prove autodetection is no longer supported. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.2.3#72005)

7 years, 2 months

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss JIRA] (ISPN-8060) Remove indexed entity autodetection

by Adrian Nistor (JIRA)

[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/ISPN-8060?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.... ] Adrian Nistor reassigned ISPN-8060: ----------------------------------- Assignee: Adrian Nistor > Remove indexed entity autodetection > ----------------------------------- > > Key: ISPN-8060 > URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/ISPN-8060 > Project: Infinispan > Issue Type: Enhancement > Components: Embedded Querying, Remote Querying > Reporter: Adrian Nistor > Assignee: Adrian Nistor > Fix For: 10.0.0.Final > > > All indexed types should be predeclared. > Existing tests for autodetection should be converted into tests that prove autodetection is no longer supported. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.2.3#72005)

7 years, 2 months

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss JIRA] (ISPN-7827) Additional Documentation for Cluster Executor

by Tristan Tarrant (JIRA)

[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/ISPN-7827?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.... ] Tristan Tarrant updated ISPN-7827: ---------------------------------- Status: Resolved (was: Pull Request Sent) Resolution: Done > Additional Documentation for Cluster Executor > --------------------------------------------- > > Key: ISPN-7827 > URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/ISPN-7827 > Project: Infinispan > Issue Type: Task > Components: Documentation-Core > Reporter: William Burns > Assignee: William Burns > Fix For: 9.1.0.Final > > > Cluster Executor has some additional API changes. We need to document these in the user guide. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.2.3#72005)

7 years, 2 months

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss JIRA] (ISPN-7973) Investigate Service Brokers

by Sebastian Łaskawiec (JIRA)

[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/ISPN-7973?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.... ] Sebastian Łaskawiec edited comment on ISPN-7973 at 7/12/17 9:17 AM: -------------------------------------------------------------------- Things to clarify and other issues: * No UI for creating/deleting/editing ServicePlans. It is also worth to mention that OpenShift Origin (with {{oc cluster up}}) comes with one default plan (use {{oc edit ServiceClass infinispan-ephemeral}} to view it). * Shall we create separate separate service or one service with multiple plans? * It seems there is no way to let the client specify how the secret created by binding should look like. It can be defined from a service broker perspective (have a look at this [test|https://github.com/openshift/origin/blob/f4b675ea183f1ebec3d15373337...]). So it might be better (for now?) to let the template create a secret for Service Consumers. * In addition to previous point - it seems that [MariaDB Template|https://github.com/openshift/origin/blob/master/examples/db-temp...] handles this correctly. We should copy its behavior. was (Author: sebastian.laskawiec): Things to clarify and other issues: * No UI for creating/deleting/editing ServicePlans. It is also worth to mention that OpenShift Origin (with {{oc cluster up}}) comes with one default plan (use {{oc edit ServiceClass infinispan-ephemeral}} to view it). * Shall we create separate separate service or one service with multiple plans? * It seems there is no way to let the client specify how the secret created by binding should look like. It can be defined from a service broker perspective (have a look at this [test|https://github.com/openshift/origin/blob/f4b675ea183f1ebec3d15373337...]). So it might be better (for now?) to let the template create a secret for Service Consumers. > Investigate Service Brokers > --------------------------- > > Key: ISPN-7973 > URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/ISPN-7973 > Project: Infinispan > Issue Type: Feature Request > Components: Cloud Integrations > Reporter: Sebastian Łaskawiec > Assignee: Sebastian Łaskawiec > -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.2.3#72005)

7 years, 2 months

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss JIRA] (ISPN-7973) Investigate Service Brokers

by Sebastian Łaskawiec (JIRA)

[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/ISPN-7973?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.... ] Sebastian Łaskawiec edited comment on ISPN-7973 at 7/12/17 8:20 AM: -------------------------------------------------------------------- Things to clarify and other issues: * No UI for creating/deleting/editing ServicePlans. It is also worth to mention that OpenShift Origin (with {{oc cluster up}}) comes with one default plan (use {{oc edit ServiceClass infinispan-ephemeral}} to view it). * Shall we create separate separate service or one service with multiple plans? * It seems there is no way to let the client specify how the secret created by binding should look like. It can be defined from a service broker perspective (have a look at this [test|https://github.com/openshift/origin/blob/f4b675ea183f1ebec3d15373337...]). So it might be better (for now?) to let the template create a secret for Service Consumers. was (Author: sebastian.laskawiec): Things to clarify and other issues: * No UI for creating/deleting/editing ServicePlans. It is also worth to mention that OpenShift Origin (with {{oc cluster up}}) comes with one default plan (use {{oc edit ServiceClass infinispan-ephemeral}} to view it). * Shall we create separate separate service or one service with multiple plans? > Investigate Service Brokers > --------------------------- > > Key: ISPN-7973 > URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/ISPN-7973 > Project: Infinispan > Issue Type: Feature Request > Components: Cloud Integrations > Reporter: Sebastian Łaskawiec > Assignee: Sebastian Łaskawiec > -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.2.3#72005)

7 years, 2 months

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss JIRA] (ISPN-8059) HotRod keySet operation requires ADMIN permissions

by Martin Gencur (JIRA)

[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/ISPN-8059?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.... ] Martin Gencur updated ISPN-8059: -------------------------------- Description: Steps to reproduce: 1) uncomment testKeySet in HotRodOperationsAuthzIT#testSupervisor (note that the supervisor has BULK_READ permission defined in configuration) 2) run the test in the server test suite This bug seems to be resolved in current master branch (9.1.0-SNAPSHOT - commit 5c5ff99) as I wasn't able to reproduce it there. Stacktrace: {code} testSupervisor(org.infinispan.server.test.client.hotrod.security.HotRodOperationsAuthzIT) Time elapsed: 0.216 sec <<< ERROR! org.infinispan.client.hotrod.exceptions.HotRodClientException: java.lang.SecurityException: ISPN000287: Unauthorized access: subject 'Subject with principal(s): [SimpleUserPrincipal [name=supervisor], InetAddressPrincipal [address=127.0.0.1/127.0.0.1], supervisor@ApplicationRealm, supervisor@ApplicationRealm, supervisor]' lacks 'ADMIN' permission at org.infinispan.client.hotrod.impl.protocol.Codec20.checkForErrorsInResponseStatus(Codec20.java:363) at org.infinispan.client.hotrod.impl.protocol.Codec20.readPartialHeader(Codec20.java:152) at org.infinispan.client.hotrod.impl.protocol.Codec20.readHeader(Codec20.java:138) at org.infinispan.client.hotrod.impl.operations.HotRodOperation.readHeaderAndValidate(HotRodOperation.java:60) at org.infinispan.client.hotrod.impl.operations.BulkGetKeysOperation.executeOperation(BulkGetKeysOperation.java:39) at org.infinispan.client.hotrod.impl.operations.BulkGetKeysOperation.executeOperation(BulkGetKeysOperation.java:20) at org.infinispan.client.hotrod.impl.operations.RetryOnFailureOperation.execute(RetryOnFailureOperation.java:56) at org.infinispan.client.hotrod.impl.RemoteCacheImpl.keySet(RemoteCacheImpl.java:529) at org.infinispan.server.test.client.hotrod.security.HotRodAuthzOperationTests.testKeySet(HotRodAuthzOperationTests.java:113) at org.infinispan.server.test.client.hotrod.security.HotRodOperationsAuthzIT.testSupervisor(HotRodOperationsAuthzIT.java:111) {code} was: Steps to reproduce: 1) uncomment testKeySet in HotRodOperationsAuthzIT#testSupervisor (note that the supervisor has BULK_READ permission defined in configuration) 2) run the test in the server test suite This bug seems to be resolved in current master branch (9.1.0-SNAPSHOT) as I wasn't able to reproduce it there. Stacktrace: {code} testSupervisor(org.infinispan.server.test.client.hotrod.security.HotRodOperationsAuthzIT) Time elapsed: 0.216 sec <<< ERROR! org.infinispan.client.hotrod.exceptions.HotRodClientException: java.lang.SecurityException: ISPN000287: Unauthorized access: subject 'Subject with principal(s): [SimpleUserPrincipal [name=supervisor], InetAddressPrincipal [address=127.0.0.1/127.0.0.1], supervisor@ApplicationRealm, supervisor@ApplicationRealm, supervisor]' lacks 'ADMIN' permission at org.infinispan.client.hotrod.impl.protocol.Codec20.checkForErrorsInResponseStatus(Codec20.java:363) at org.infinispan.client.hotrod.impl.protocol.Codec20.readPartialHeader(Codec20.java:152) at org.infinispan.client.hotrod.impl.protocol.Codec20.readHeader(Codec20.java:138) at org.infinispan.client.hotrod.impl.operations.HotRodOperation.readHeaderAndValidate(HotRodOperation.java:60) at org.infinispan.client.hotrod.impl.operations.BulkGetKeysOperation.executeOperation(BulkGetKeysOperation.java:39) at org.infinispan.client.hotrod.impl.operations.BulkGetKeysOperation.executeOperation(BulkGetKeysOperation.java:20) at org.infinispan.client.hotrod.impl.operations.RetryOnFailureOperation.execute(RetryOnFailureOperation.java:56) at org.infinispan.client.hotrod.impl.RemoteCacheImpl.keySet(RemoteCacheImpl.java:529) at org.infinispan.server.test.client.hotrod.security.HotRodAuthzOperationTests.testKeySet(HotRodAuthzOperationTests.java:113) at org.infinispan.server.test.client.hotrod.security.HotRodOperationsAuthzIT.testSupervisor(HotRodOperationsAuthzIT.java:111) {code} > HotRod keySet operation requires ADMIN permissions > -------------------------------------------------- > > Key: ISPN-8059 > URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/ISPN-8059 > Project: Infinispan > Issue Type: Bug > Components: Security > Affects Versions: 9.0.3.Final > Reporter: Martin Gencur > > Steps to reproduce: > 1) uncomment testKeySet in HotRodOperationsAuthzIT#testSupervisor > (note that the supervisor has BULK_READ permission defined in configuration) > 2) run the test in the server test suite > This bug seems to be resolved in current master branch (9.1.0-SNAPSHOT - commit 5c5ff99) as I wasn't able to reproduce it there. > Stacktrace: > {code} > testSupervisor(org.infinispan.server.test.client.hotrod.security.HotRodOperationsAuthzIT) Time elapsed: 0.216 sec <<< ERROR! > org.infinispan.client.hotrod.exceptions.HotRodClientException: java.lang.SecurityException: ISPN000287: Unauthorized access: subject 'Subject with principal(s): [SimpleUserPrincipal [name=supervisor], InetAddressPrincipal [address=127.0.0.1/127.0.0.1], supervisor@ApplicationRealm, supervisor@ApplicationRealm, supervisor]' lacks 'ADMIN' permission > at org.infinispan.client.hotrod.impl.protocol.Codec20.checkForErrorsInResponseStatus(Codec20.java:363) > at org.infinispan.client.hotrod.impl.protocol.Codec20.readPartialHeader(Codec20.java:152) > at org.infinispan.client.hotrod.impl.protocol.Codec20.readHeader(Codec20.java:138) > at org.infinispan.client.hotrod.impl.operations.HotRodOperation.readHeaderAndValidate(HotRodOperation.java:60) > at org.infinispan.client.hotrod.impl.operations.BulkGetKeysOperation.executeOperation(BulkGetKeysOperation.java:39) > at org.infinispan.client.hotrod.impl.operations.BulkGetKeysOperation.executeOperation(BulkGetKeysOperation.java:20) > at org.infinispan.client.hotrod.impl.operations.RetryOnFailureOperation.execute(RetryOnFailureOperation.java:56) > at org.infinispan.client.hotrod.impl.RemoteCacheImpl.keySet(RemoteCacheImpl.java:529) > at org.infinispan.server.test.client.hotrod.security.HotRodAuthzOperationTests.testKeySet(HotRodAuthzOperationTests.java:113) > at org.infinispan.server.test.client.hotrod.security.HotRodOperationsAuthzIT.testSupervisor(HotRodOperationsAuthzIT.java:111) > {code} -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.2.3#72005)

7 years, 2 months

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss JIRA] (ISPN-8059) HotRod keySet operation requires ADMIN permissions

by Martin Gencur (JIRA)

Martin Gencur created ISPN-8059: ----------------------------------- Summary: HotRod keySet operation requires ADMIN permissions Key: ISPN-8059 URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/ISPN-8059 Project: Infinispan Issue Type: Bug Components: Security Affects Versions: 9.0.3.Final Reporter: Martin Gencur Steps to reproduce: 1) uncomment testKeySet in HotRodOperationsAuthzIT#testSupervisor (note that the supervisor has BULK_READ permission defined in configuration) 2) run the test in the server test suite This bug seems to be resolved in current master branch (9.1.0-SNAPSHOT) as I wasn't able to reproduce it there. Stacktrace: {code} testSupervisor(org.infinispan.server.test.client.hotrod.security.HotRodOperationsAuthzIT) Time elapsed: 0.216 sec <<< ERROR! org.infinispan.client.hotrod.exceptions.HotRodClientException: java.lang.SecurityException: ISPN000287: Unauthorized access: subject 'Subject with principal(s): [SimpleUserPrincipal [name=supervisor], InetAddressPrincipal [address=127.0.0.1/127.0.0.1], supervisor@ApplicationRealm, supervisor@ApplicationRealm, supervisor]' lacks 'ADMIN' permission at org.infinispan.client.hotrod.impl.protocol.Codec20.checkForErrorsInResponseStatus(Codec20.java:363) at org.infinispan.client.hotrod.impl.protocol.Codec20.readPartialHeader(Codec20.java:152) at org.infinispan.client.hotrod.impl.protocol.Codec20.readHeader(Codec20.java:138) at org.infinispan.client.hotrod.impl.operations.HotRodOperation.readHeaderAndValidate(HotRodOperation.java:60) at org.infinispan.client.hotrod.impl.operations.BulkGetKeysOperation.executeOperation(BulkGetKeysOperation.java:39) at org.infinispan.client.hotrod.impl.operations.BulkGetKeysOperation.executeOperation(BulkGetKeysOperation.java:20) at org.infinispan.client.hotrod.impl.operations.RetryOnFailureOperation.execute(RetryOnFailureOperation.java:56) at org.infinispan.client.hotrod.impl.RemoteCacheImpl.keySet(RemoteCacheImpl.java:529) at org.infinispan.server.test.client.hotrod.security.HotRodAuthzOperationTests.testKeySet(HotRodAuthzOperationTests.java:113) at org.infinispan.server.test.client.hotrod.security.HotRodOperationsAuthzIT.testSupervisor(HotRodOperationsAuthzIT.java:111) {code} -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.2.3#72005)

7 years, 2 months

1
0
0 / 0

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

infinispan-issues July 2017