Infinispan error running on IBM JDK ----------------------------------- Key: ISPN-3457 URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/ISPN-3457 Project: Infinispan Issue Type: Bug Components: Distributed Cache Affects Versions: 6.0.0.Alpha3 Environment: WAS 8.0.0.6 JDK, Windows 7 Professional Reporter: Luis Montoya Assignee: Mircea Markus Fix For: 6.0.0.Alpha3 I created a sample application using infinispan on standar JDK (Sun/Oracle). This app works fine using this JDK. I tried to run the app on IBM JDK (the needed for WAS), but I get the below error: org.infinispan.commons.CacheException: Unable to construct a GlobalComponentRegistry! at org.infinispan.factories.GlobalComponentRegistry.<init>(GlobalComponentRegistry.java:129) at org.infinispan.manager.DefaultCacheManager.<init>(DefaultCacheManager.java:276) at org.infinispan.manager.DefaultCacheManager.<init>(DefaultCacheManager.java:246) at org.infinispan.quickstart.clusteredcache.replication.AbstractNode.createCacheManagerProgramatically(AbstractNode.java:41) at org.infinispan.quickstart.clusteredcache.replication.AbstractNode.<init>(AbstractNode.java:62) at org.infinispan.quickstart.clusteredcache.replication.Node0.main(Node0.java:32) Caused by: org.infinispan.commons.CacheException: Unable to invoke method public void org.infinispan.topology.LocalTopologyManagerImpl.inject(org.infinispan.remoting.transport.Transport,java.util.concurrent.ExecutorService,org.infinispan.factories.GlobalComponentRegistry,org.infinispan.util.TimeService) on object of type LocalTopologyManagerImpl with parameters [org.infinispan.executors.LazyInitializingExecutorService@96d7b55b, org.infinispan.executors.LazyInitializingExecutorService@96d7b55b, org.infinispan.factories.GlobalComponentRegistry@9fd5a559, org.infinispan.util.DefaultTimeService@725adace] at org.infinispan.commons.util.ReflectionUtil.invokeAccessibly(ReflectionUtil.java:188) at org.infinispan.factories.AbstractComponentRegistry.invokeInjectionMethod(AbstractComponentRegistry.java:229) at org.infinispan.factories.AbstractComponentRegistry.access$000(AbstractComponentRegistry.java:65) at org.infinispan.factories.AbstractComponentRegistry$Component.injectDependencies(AbstractComponentRegistry.java:797) at org.infinispan.factories.AbstractComponentRegistry.registerComponentInternal(AbstractComponentRegistry.java:201) at org.infinispan.factories.AbstractComponentRegistry.registerComponent(AbstractComponentRegistry.java:156) at org.infinispan.factories.AbstractComponentRegistry.getOrCreateComponent(AbstractComponentRegistry.java:277) at org.infinispan.factories.AbstractComponentRegistry.getOrCreateComponent(AbstractComponentRegistry.java:253) at org.infinispan.factories.GlobalComponentRegistry.<init>(GlobalComponentRegistry.java:125) ... 5 more Caused by: java.lang.IllegalArgumentException: discrepancia en el tipo de argumento at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method) at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:48) at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:25) at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:600) at org.infinispan.commons.util.ReflectionUtil.invokeAccessibly(ReflectionUtil.java:183) ... 13 more It seems that a method which is being invoked through reflection is receiving incorrectly the first parameter, which should be a org.infinispan.remoting.transport.Transport instance, but it is receiving a org.infinispan.executors.LazyInitializingExecutorService@96d7b55b instance The code which launch the error is the next: new DefaultCacheManager( GlobalConfigurationBuilder.defaultClusteredBuilder().globalJmxStatistics().allowDuplicateDomains(true) .transport().addProperty("configurationFile", "jgroups.xml") .build(), new ConfigurationBuilder() .clustering().cacheMode(CacheMode.REPL_SYNC) .build() ); Making a review and debug of the code, the next behavior was seen which produce the error: if a map called map contains something like this {1=some.class.type}, and you try to get a value using the 0 as the key ( map.get(0), it doens't return null rather it returns the value for the 1 key, it means, for map.get(0) it returns "some.class.type", as if map.get(1) was called) Also, when the contains method of Map interface is called ( map.contains(0)), it returns true, which is incorrect because the map only has the 1 key This behavior is happening on this class and method: class: org.infinispan.factories.components.ComponentMetadata$InjectMetadata methods: getParameterName, isParameterNameSet