[
https://issues.jboss.org/browse/ISPN-2133?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin....
]
Sanne Grinovero commented on ISPN-2133:
---------------------------------------
One more thought:
traditionally such problems are solved by Java's standard Serialization.
Imagine you're sending in bulk / batches, writing many objects which have some large
string in common, or sharing any other large object.
Standard serialization - including JBoss Marshalling - already do support object graphs
and therefore re-materialize the object as one.
So it could be that serializing all values into one single Blob is much more efficient
than serializing multiple commands independently; if we could do that, we'd be able to
reap benefits at basically no API change cost.
Incidentally there would be two benefits:
* smaller payload on the wire
* smaller heap consumption on the receiver's size, as same objects would be
deserialized "as one" rather than being materialized as multiple copies
Thinking about this, it implies that Infinispan might have a problem with "size
amplification": if I estimate my object size locally to try to estimate how much
space my data grid will need, I'm doing it wrong as the estimate we'd do today
would not take into account of this size amplification.
Provide a context for object de-serialization
---------------------------------------------
Key: ISPN-2133
URL:
https://issues.jboss.org/browse/ISPN-2133
Project: Infinispan
Issue Type: Feature Request
Components: Core, Marshalling
Reporter: Sanne Grinovero
Assignee: Galder ZamarreƱo
Labels: SLOWING_OGM, for_OGM
See proposal description at
http://lists.jboss.org/pipermail/infinispan-dev/2012-June/010925.html
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.2.3#72005)