[
https://issues.jboss.org/browse/ISPN-8204?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin....
]
Radim Vansa updated ISPN-8204:
------------------------------
Description:
If {{cache.remove(k)}} is called on non-existent key, it should become a no-op, marking
the command as unsuccessful, not writing the cache store and not replicating the change to
backup owners. That makes the command effectively conditional (as it checks previous
value), in the same way as {{cache.replace(k, newValue)}} is.
While I think that this is the correct behaviour, it's a breaking change for
transactions. Some transactions may become read-only and there are multiple tests in the
testsuite that would be broken by this.
was:
If {{cache.remove(k)}} is called on non-existent key, it should become a no-op, marking
the command as unsuccessful, and not replicating the change to backup owners. That makes
the command effectively conditional (as it checks previous value), in the same way as
{{cache.replace(k, newValue)}} is.
While I think that this is the correct behaviour, it's a breaking change for
transactions. Some transactions may become read-only and there are multiple tests in the
testsuite that would be broken by this.
Remove should be conditional
----------------------------
Key: ISPN-8204
URL:
https://issues.jboss.org/browse/ISPN-8204
Project: Infinispan
Issue Type: Bug
Components: Core
Affects Versions: 9.1.0.Final
Reporter: Radim Vansa
Assignee: Radim Vansa
If {{cache.remove(k)}} is called on non-existent key, it should become a no-op, marking
the command as unsuccessful, not writing the cache store and not replicating the change to
backup owners. That makes the command effectively conditional (as it checks previous
value), in the same way as {{cache.replace(k, newValue)}} is.
While I think that this is the correct behaviour, it's a breaking change for
transactions. Some transactions may become read-only and there are multiple tests in the
testsuite that would be broken by this.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.2.3#72005)