Pedro Ruivo created ISPN-8161: --------------------------------- Summary: Inconsistent behavior with unsafe flags Key: ISPN-8161 URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/ISPN-8161 Project: Infinispan Issue Type: Bug Components: Core, L1, Transactions Reporter: Pedro Ruivo Assignee: Pedro Ruivo There is a small inconsistency with unsafe flags and conditional commands when the cache is transactions and L1 is enabled. Some conditional commands don't set the unsafe flags while others do. Unsafe flags are set to: * putIfAbsent(k,v) * replace(k,v) and they aren't set for: * remove(k, v) * replace(k, v, v) this brings to an inconsistent behavior. In a non-owner: * a replace(k, v) will fetch the entry and *don't* store it in L1 * a replace(k, v, v) will fetch the entry and store it in L1 Proposed fix: don't set the unsafe flags for all the conditional commands. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.2.3#72005)