[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/ISPN-6430?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.... ] Gustavo Fernandes commented on ISPN-6430: ----------------------------------------- bq. I'm not against it but we should find a good reason to have it. One reason would be symmetry: library mode config when transposed to server behaves differently at the moment (see forum reference). Other reason would be performance. What if one indexed cache has only a handful of entries and other index cache millions? bq. and this spares us from the problems generated by creating indexes dynamically. We'll have to declare all indexed protobuf types at startup Right, that would be necessary if one wishes to control config on a per index basis. Hibernate Search by default names indexes using the class name of the entity, I'm wondering if it'd be possible to do something similar when indexing protobuf entities, i.e., take the type name and pass it to hibernate search. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.4.11#64026)