jboss-remoting-issues
March 2010
jboss-remoting-issues@lists.jboss.org
- 1 participants
- 72 discussions
[JBoss JIRA] Updated: (JBREM-918) Make "remote:" resilient against connection failure
by David Lloyd (JIRA)
[ https://jira.jboss.org/jira/browse/JBREM-918?page=com.atlassian.jira.plug... ]
David Lloyd updated JBREM-918:
------------------------------
Summary: Make "remote:" resilient against connection failure (was: Make JRPP resilient against connection failure)
Description:
If a remote connection is dropped, it should be possible to re-establish the connection and resume the session, without the loss of any in-flight requests/contexts/services/etc. As a corollary, it might be worth exploring having more than one connection in a "bundle" to help parallelize the transit load and avoid head-of-line bottleneck problems. Perhaps it is worth looking into multihoming as well.
SSL contexts might be useful here.
was:If a JRPP connection is dropped, it should be possible to re-establish the connection and resume the session, without the loss of any in-flight requests/contexts/services/etc. As a corollary, it might be worth exploring having more than one connection in a "bundle" to help parallelize the transit load and avoid head-of-line bottleneck problems. Perhaps it is worth looking into multihoming as well. Note that this looks a lot like a list of features that SCTP already has...
> Make "remote:" resilient against connection failure
> ---------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: JBREM-918
> URL: https://jira.jboss.org/jira/browse/JBREM-918
> Project: JBoss Remoting
> Issue Type: Feature Request
> Security Level: Public(Everyone can see)
> Components: r3 core: remote
> Reporter: David Lloyd
> Fix For: 3.1.0.Beta1
>
>
> If a remote connection is dropped, it should be possible to re-establish the connection and resume the session, without the loss of any in-flight requests/contexts/services/etc. As a corollary, it might be worth exploring having more than one connection in a "bundle" to help parallelize the transit load and avoid head-of-line bottleneck problems. Perhaps it is worth looking into multihoming as well.
> SSL contexts might be useful here.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: https://jira.jboss.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
14 years, 8 months
- 1
- 0
[JBoss JIRA] Created: (JBREM-1171) Integrate remote protocol into R3
by David Lloyd (JIRA)
Integrate remote protocol into R3
---------------------------------
Key: JBREM-1171
URL: https://jira.jboss.org/jira/browse/JBREM-1171
Project: JBoss Remoting
Issue Type: Task
Security Level: Public (Everyone can see)
Components: r3 core
Reporter: David Lloyd
Assignee: David Lloyd
Fix For: 3.1.0.GA
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: https://jira.jboss.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
14 years, 8 months
- 1
- 2