Got no clue what you're saying
On 15 September 2015 at 13:35, Lennart Jörelid <lennart.jorelid(a)gmail.com>
wrote:
That is - in itself - a problem for an application with
works-out-of-the-Box aspirations, yes?
// vänlig hälsning,
// [sw: "best regards"],
//
// Lennart Jörelid
15 sep 2015 kl. 13:29 skrev Stian Thorgersen <sthorger(a)redhat.com>:
Why would we need i18n/l10n for examples? We don't provide
internationalization of applications themselves.
On 15 September 2015 at 10:02, Boleslaw Dawidowicz <bdawidow(a)redhat.com>
wrote:
> I would rather keep them simple.
>
> We would consider a single bigger and more complex one - then it would
> fit.
>
> On Mon, Sep 14, 2015 at 5:40 PM, Stan Silvert <ssilvert(a)redhat.com>
> wrote:
> > Wondering...
> >
> > Will we need to do i18n/l10n for the examples?
> >
> > Do we want to upgrade angular for the examples that us it? Right now,
> > they are still using AngularJS 1.2 while the admin console uses 1.4.
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > keycloak-dev mailing list
> > keycloak-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
> >
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/keycloak-dev
>
>
>
> --
> Bolesław Dawidowicz
>
> _______________________________________________
> keycloak-dev mailing list
> keycloak-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/keycloak-dev
>
_______________________________________________
keycloak-dev mailing list
keycloak-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/keycloak-dev