I just tried with a POST (both after a logout due to timout + plus kc
intiiated logout) and it is behaving as expected (no OPTIONS call) ...
Maybe it's related to EAP/EAP Adapter ...
On Mon, Mar 25, 2019 at 10:53 AM Raul Fechete <
rfechete(a)grid-applications.com> wrote:
Is your browser (JSP webseite) doing a POST call towards the
application
server?
The login flow works fine as long as the browser is doing a GET. From what
I understand, in this case the browser is trying to do a POST towards the
application server and gets redirected towards KC by the adapter and since
a **POST** was redirected, it then first tries an OPTIONS on the KC
(maybe to see if it should also try a POST on the KC?).
I did a replay on the redirect answer from the adapter using GET instead
of OPTIONS, and it does work.
Also, I tried the auth flow with both the current Firefox and Chrome
browser and it’s the same: browser calls POST on the AS -> Adapter replies
with 302 Redirect -> browser calls OPTIONS on the KC.
This is really weird. I can’t be the only one with a JSF website behind
the KC adapter, whose sessions ran out.
*From:* Sebastien Blanc <sblanc(a)redhat.com>
*Sent:* 25 March 2019 10:34
*To:* Raul Fechete <rfechete(a)grid-applications.com>; keycloak userlist <
keycloak-user(a)lists.jboss.org>
*Subject:* Re: [keycloak-user] KeyCloak Server and HTTP OPTIONS
(JSF/Primefaces behind KC Adapter)
Indeed it's weird that it tries to do an OPTIONS. I just tried with a
simple JSP app with WF 15 and the WF Elytron adapter and I can not
reproduce it.
Maybe the best is to open a ticket and also add a reproducer.
Also instead of using + or * , could you try by entering the entire domain
name like "http://localhost:8080" ?
On Mon, Mar 25, 2019 at 8:29 AM Raul Fechete <
rfechete(a)grid-applications.com> wrote:
Yes I have (both * and +), but it makes no difference. Making a HTTP
OPTIONS call on KeyCloak always returns 204 No Content, regardless of the
URL I’m using. I can even manually call OPTIONS on
http://localhost:8180/auth/admin/master/console, which has nothing to do
with the authentication flow and the answer is still 204.
The URL used during the authentication flow is:
http://localhost:8180/auth/realms/<REALM>/protocol/openid-connect/a...
This URL works perfectly fine when the browser uses GET, but returns 204
when the browser uses OPTIONS.. After the 204, the browser just doesn’t do
anything else.
Am I missing something?
Thank you very much!
*From:* Sebastien Blanc <sblanc(a)redhat.com>
*Sent:* 21 March 2019 17:45
*To:* Raul Fechete <rfechete(a)grid-applications.com>
*Cc:* keycloak-user(a)lists.jboss.org
*Subject:* Re: [keycloak-user] KeyCloak Server and HTTP OPTIONS
(JSF/Primefaces behind KC Adapter)
Have you put a value for the Web Origin property in the client
configuration on the KC Console ?
On Thu, Mar 21, 2019 at 12:46 PM Raul Fechete <
rfechete(a)grid-applications.com> wrote:
Hello,
I'm trying to build what should be a trivial setup, but I'm having trouble
getting to work properly.
I have a JSF Application running on JBoss EAP 7.2, secured by the KC Java
Adapter. The initial login flow works perfectly fine (browser asks for
website, adapter intercepts and redirects to KC, user logs in with KC and
is being redirected back to the website).
Now, the JSF application often uses POST requests. If the user has been
logged out (e.g. in KC directly), clicking anywhere on the website triggers
a POST request to the application, which is being intercepted by the KC
Adapter and redirected (302) to KC. This would be fine, but the problem is,
the browser then performs a HTTP *OPTIONS* call to KC instead of HTTP GET,
and the KC just returns 204 without any further information. I also noticed
that the KC Server *always* replies with an empty 204 to a HTTP OPTIONS
call, even if there is nothing else in the request.
Is there any way to configure the handling of the OPTIONS requests in KC?
Alternatively, is it possible to configure the adapter to send a 303 and
thereby force the browser to perform a GET request? Or am I doing something
conceptually wrong?
Any help would be appreciated!
Thank you very much!
Cheers, Raul
_______________________________________________
keycloak-user mailing list
keycloak-user(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/keycloak-user