Hi Marek,
Right, that's the plan.
Thanks for your time.
Orestis
On Tue, Jun 30, 2015 at 3:39 PM, Marek Posolda <mposolda(a)redhat.com> wrote:
Hi Orestis,
the alternative is also to use our admin REST api directly and invoke REST
endpoints for create/update client directly without using our admin console.
Marek
On 30.6.2015 14:30, Orestis Tsakiridis wrote:
Hi Marek,
my comments inline:
On Tue, Jun 30, 2015 at 2:44 PM, Marek Posolda <mposolda(a)redhat.com>
wrote:
> How much clients you have in mind?
>
>
I guess 100-1000 would be realistic. But more may come later.
> Theoretically there is no any limit. At least at database level. Fact
> is that we didn't try to test admin console UI with very big number of
> clients. Feel free to create JIRA if you're seeing issues.
>
>
Thanks. Before doing this, i just want to be sure that i'm on the right
path and there are no alternatives. For instance, i've also considered
creating a new realm per machine but this won't work either. A user's
identity should be global but also have access to selected machine(s). I
think that concept can work only within a single realm.
> Another approach is to design your deployment so the number of clients
> is not too big. For example when adding new "machine" you can reuse
already
> created clients (not sure if it's the approach which works for you, just a
> possible hint...)
>
Unfortunately that won't work either. :-(. We need those clients and their
respective machines to be in place and operational.
> Marek
>
>
Anyway, thanks for the help Marek!
Regards
Orestis
> On 30.6.2015 09:50, Orestis Tsakiridis wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> Is there a limit in the maximum number of clients/applications in single
> realm supported by keycloak?
>
> I can see that the keycloak admin UI is not built with a big number in
> mind. For instance, when assigning "Client roles" to a realm user there is
> a dropdown with all clients/applications in the realm. I guess this
> shouldn't grow too big to be usuable.
>
> I'm working on a scenario where i need to implement authorization in a
> system where new machines (and their respective keycloak applications) will
> be added on the fly. So i'm worying about what will happen if the number
> starts to grow.
>
>
> Thanks
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> keycloak-user mailing
listkeycloak-user@lists.jboss.orghttps://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/keycloak-user
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> keycloak-user mailing list
> keycloak-user(a)lists.jboss.org
>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/keycloak-user
>