Hi Stian,
Thank you for the confirmation.
Kind regards,
Adrian
On Tue, Jul 19, 2016 at 8:45 AM, Stian Thorgersen <sthorger(a)redhat.com>
wrote:
The REST service doesn't need to communicate directly with
Keycloak. The
auth-server-url is required by a bearer only token mainly to verify the
issuer in the token (it's the full url of the realm, not just the realm
name).
On 15 July 2016 at 16:34, Adrian Matei <adrianmatei(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> Does a Keycloak secured REST Api on JBoss EAP 6.1 (access-type bearer
> only) need to communicate with the Keycloak Server once the Adapter and
> standalone.xml are properly configured?
>
> Currently both servers are on the same DMZ zone, but we'd like to move
> the REST Api Server in Intranet zone.
>
> (test - the REST backend seems to be callable as long as the token is
> valid, though the Keycloak Server was shutdown, but I ask myself why do I
> need to specify the auth-server-url in standalone.xml, or keycloak.json
> file)
>
>
> Thanks
> Adrian
>
> _______________________________________________
> keycloak-user mailing list
> keycloak-user(a)lists.jboss.org
>
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/keycloak-user
>