We have an idea to isolate our application in our internal network so that all communication in that network can go by HTTP. So we've set up a public nginx server, witch is responsible for establishing https connections. Public nginx server forwards requests to another nginx server in secured internal network, witch is in turn accesses Keycloak and WildFly by HTTP. But this configuration is not working because of invalid redirect issue. In our client's json file we have to define auth-server-url with HTTPS scheme. When we try to specify HTTP Keycloak no longer works. So my question: is it possible to make things work by HTTP in internal private network and HTTPS only remain for public access. Any guidance will be appreciated. _______________________________________________ keycloak-user mailing list keycloak-user(a)lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/keycloak-user

We have an idea to isolate our application in our internal network so that all communication in that network can go by HTTP. So we've set up a public nginx server, witch is responsible for establishing https connections. Public nginx server forwards requests to another nginx server in secured internal network, witch is in turn accesses Keycloak and WildFly by HTTP. But this configuration is not working because of invalid redirect issue. In our client's json file we have to define auth-server-url with HTTPS scheme. When we try to specify HTTP Keycloak no longer works. So my question: is it possible to make things work by HTTP in internal private network and HTTPS only remain for public access. Any guidance will be appreciated. _______________________________________________ keycloak-user mailing list keycloak-user(a)lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/keycloak-user

That's exact feature which I've been looking for. That will solve our problem with reverse proxy. I defenetly vote for this feature to be implemented! 2016-12-05 11:57 GMT+03:00 Michael Furman <michael_furman(a)hotmail.com&gt;: > Dear Keycloak people, > > Please find below the suggestion that will allow easiest integration of > Keycloak behind HTTPS reverse proxy. > > I suggest to add to the Keycloak configuration the new property – the > client URL. > > Then, the Keycloak will use the property when generating tokens or > metadata (instead of to rely on incoming HTTP request). > > This will allow to use Keycloak over HTTP and to use SSL only in reverse > proxy. > > Additional suggestion will allow to configure Keycloak to work behind > Reverse Proxy with Network Address Translation (NAT) (I have asked the > question here http://lists.jboss.org/piperma > il/keycloak-user/2016-November/008454.html). > > I suggest to add to the Keycloak configuration the additional new > property – the internal client URL. > > Then Keycloak will use the property in org.keycloak.protocol.oidc.OIDCWellKnownProvider > and will create the well-known configuration with internal and external IPs. > > Clients will use the well-known configuration and will be able to connect > to Keycloak without any problems. > > What do you say about the suggestions? > > If you think it is good I will happy to implement and test it during our > integration with Keycloak. > > Best regards, > > Michael > > > ------------------------------ > *From:* keycloak-user-bounces(a)lists.jboss.org < > keycloak-user-bounces(a)lists.jboss.org&gt; on behalf of Gabriel Lavoie < > glavoie(a)gmail.com&gt; > *Sent:* Wednesday, November 30, 2016 6:33 PM > *To:* Andrey Saroul > *Cc:* keycloak-user > *Subject:* Re: [keycloak-user] Keycloak behind 2 Nginx reverse proxies > (HTTPS -> HTTP) > > Hi Andrew, > The answer is "it depends". When generating tokens or metadata, > Keycloak uses the scheme://hostname:port/ that was used to access it to > fill the different issuers/URLs. The same values must match in the client > JSON file so the client can validate the source of the token. > > At the client level, this could be handled by having a custom translation > step over the configuration that accept both schemes and match it to the > issuer, not something that Keycloak seems to support natively last time I > checked. > > Doing SSO through multiple aliases always has this sort of issues. This is > usually something that should be avoided. Can you keep Keycloak HTTPs and > your application HTTP in your internal network? > > Gabriel > > 2016-11-25 8:08 GMT-05:00 Andrey Saroul <andrey.saroul(a)gmail.com&gt;: > > > We have an idea to isolate our application in our internal network so > that > > all communication in that network can go by HTTP. > > So we've set up a public nginx server, witch is responsible for > > establishing https connections. > > Public nginx server forwards requests to another nginx server in secured > > internal network, witch is in turn accesses Keycloak and WildFly by > HTTP. > > But this configuration is not working because of invalid redirect issue. > > In our client's json file we have to define auth-server-url with HTTPS > > scheme. When we try to specify HTTP Keycloak no longer works. > > So my question: is it possible to make things work by HTTP in internal > > private network and HTTPS only remain for public access. > > Any guidance will be appreciated. > > _______________________________________________ > > keycloak-user mailing list > > keycloak-user(a)lists.jboss.org > > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/keycloak-user > keycloak-user Info Page - JBoss Developer > <https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/keycloak-user> > lists.jboss.org > To see the collection of prior postings to the list, visit the > keycloak-user Archives. Using keycloak-user: To post a message to all the > list members ... > > > > > > > -- > Gabriel Lavoie > glavoie(a)gmail.com > _______________________________________________ > keycloak-user mailing list > keycloak-user(a)lists.jboss.org > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/keycloak-user > keycloak-user Info Page - JBoss Developer > <https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/keycloak-user> > lists.jboss.org > To see the collection of prior postings to the list, visit the > keycloak-user Archives. Using keycloak-user: To post a message to all the > list members ... > >