Author: marius.bogoevici
Date: 2010-10-26 14:38:40 -0400 (Tue, 26 Oct 2010)
New Revision: 7041
Modified:
cdi-tck/branches/1.0/impl/src/main/java/org/jboss/jsr299/tck/tests/decorators/definition/DecoratorDefinitionTest.java
Log:
CDITCK-180 Superinterfaces are decorated types
Modified:
cdi-tck/branches/1.0/impl/src/main/java/org/jboss/jsr299/tck/tests/decorators/definition/DecoratorDefinitionTest.java
===================================================================
---
cdi-tck/branches/1.0/impl/src/main/java/org/jboss/jsr299/tck/tests/decorators/definition/DecoratorDefinitionTest.java 2010-10-25
00:52:43 UTC (rev 7040)
+++
cdi-tck/branches/1.0/impl/src/main/java/org/jboss/jsr299/tck/tests/decorators/definition/DecoratorDefinitionTest.java 2010-10-26
18:38:40 UTC (rev 7041)
@@ -87,10 +87,10 @@
assert decorators.get(0).getDecoratedTypes().contains(Foo.class);
assert decorators.get(0).getDecoratedTypes().contains(Bar.class);
assert decorators.get(0).getDecoratedTypes().contains(Baz.class);
+ assert !decorators.get(0).getDecoratedTypes().contains(Boo.class);
assert !decorators.get(0).getDecoratedTypes().contains(Serializable.class);
assert !decorators.get(0).getDecoratedTypes().contains(FooDecorator.class);
assert
!decorators.get(0).getDecoratedTypes().contains(AbstractFooDecorator.class);
- assert !decorators.get(0).getDecoratedTypes().contains(Boo.class);
}
@Test
Show replies by date