[
https://jira.jboss.org/jira/browse/WBRI-329?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugi...
]
Pete Muir commented on WBRI-329:
--------------------------------
Forgot about the SE case so I can see the need for
resolve(InjectionPoint) there.
Will there be some way to configure at boot time whether the EE-style injection
that the WebBeans impl requests is done through a single (to-be-defined)
"inject"
call vs. through individual resolve(InjectionPoint) invocations?
That is my proposal, I just need to find a decent way to express that through an API.
You'll also be adding a separate web beans SPI that will just do
299 style injection?
That's the one the ejb container will use during ejb instance creation, independent
of whether the instance is being created as part of a contextual or non-contextual
invocation.
Yes, probably this is a good approach.
I thought about whether we still need an interceptor - we do (I think) so we can track EJB
instance destruction.
Move EJB injection to InjectionTarget
-------------------------------------
Key: WBRI-329
URL:
https://jira.jboss.org/jira/browse/WBRI-329
Project: Web Beans
Issue Type: Bug
Components: Enterprise Beans, Glassfish integration
Environment: 1.0.0.PREVIEW2.SP2 in 7/30/09 GlassFish V3 workspace
Reporter: Ken Saks
Fix For: 1.0.0.CR1
Currently we perform 299 style injection into EJBs via an interceptor, I would prefer to
move this to use the InjectionTarget SPI.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators:
https://jira.jboss.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see:
http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira