On Fri, May 13, 2016 at 6:12 AM, David M. Lloyd <david.lloyd(a)redhat.com>
wrote:
I like approach 3, assuming that it'll move in to e.g. GitHub.
If
there's an update to a doc, it's a lot easier to backport using git than
Confluence. Less chance of old docs getting abandoned, and easier for
users to contribute fixes and updates if they can just open a PR for
each affected version. We're already reasonably well-trained to deal
with old branches.
I don't know how we'd organize it though; I've never done multi-document
things using asciidoc, and also we'd have to publish it somehow
(preferably in an automated manner).
Actually it does look like there is an include:: option. My guess though is
the reason there's a lot of combining asciidoc with awestruct is to build
these multi-page sites.
[1]:
http://www.methods.co.nz/asciidoc/userguide.html#X63
--
- DML
_______________________________________________
wildfly-dev mailing list
wildfly-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/wildfly-dev
--
James R. Perkins
JBoss by Red Hat