Re: [wildfly-dev] Mixing org.jboss.as and org.wildfly packages

On 6 Apr 2017, at 07:56, Josef Cacek <jcacek(a)redhat.com&gt; wrote: I think, Tomaz should share his view (CC-ing) During our discussion related to Elytron testing, his preference was to use org.wildfly package names. -- Josef ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Stuart Douglas" <stuart.w.douglas(a)gmail.com&gt; > To: wildfly-dev(a)lists.jboss.org > Sent: Monday, April 3, 2017 3:45:59 AM > Subject: [wildfly-dev] Mixing org.jboss.as and org.wildfly packages > > Hi, > > So this is a minor issue, but it annoys me so I thought I would see what > other people think about it. In the test suite I have noticed that some new > code is being added under the org.wildfly package, even though all the > existing code is still under org.jboss.as . > > I don't think this is a good idea, as it means there is two potential places > to look for something, with no real reason why something is in a particular > package other than the date it was added. > > I propose that we move all the org.wildfly code into org.jboss.as to keep > everything consistent (moving everything to org.wildfly would also be an > option, but it has implications for backporting and has the potential to > create a lot more work). > > Does anyone have any objections to this? If not I will prepare some PR's. > > Stuart > > _______________________________________________ > wildfly-dev mailing list > wildfly-dev(a)lists.jboss.org > https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/wildfly-dev _______________________________________________ wildfly-dev mailing list wildfly-dev(a)lists.jboss.org https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/wildfly-dev