Does the spec require that JobExecution be tied to a CMT transaction? It sounds like it
should not be. If you were to make this into a local transaction that is committed before
the call to create the job completes, then you shouldn’t have that problem.
On Feb 4, 2014, at 8:49 AM, Cheng Fang <cfang(a)redhat.com> wrote:
A jberet user reported JBERET-29 (Foreign key constraint
step_execution_jobexecutionid_fkey fails when using Postgresql on WildFly, and we are
trying to fix it by jberet 1.0.0.Final. The problem happens when user app starts a job
within a transaction (e.g., CMT EJB), jberet inserts JobExecution into database (thread 1
& transaction 1), and then spawn a jberet-batch thread to run the job (thead 2 &
transaction 2). Sometimes T2 tries to access db before T1 is committed, hence the error
reported by the user.
What's the common approach for solving this kind of problem? I suppose other WildFly
components may also have this issue and probably already solved. Using transaction
synchronization is a cleaner solution than polling db, but I'm not sure about its full
implication. Ideally, I don't want to use system level JTA API like
TransactionManager or Synchronization in jberet proper, but probably we can implement it
in WildFly jberet integration.
Thanks,
Cheng
_______________________________________________
wildfly-dev mailing list
wildfly-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/wildfly-dev
--
Jason T. Greene
WildFly Lead / JBoss EAP Platform Architect
JBoss, a division of Red Hat