On Thu, Mar 3, 2022 at 1:50 PM Brian Stansberry <brian.stansberry(a)redhat.com>
wrote:
Interesting.
Why couldn't that be deployed? Doing so from the RESTEasy build probably
isn't good, but a branch in
https://github.com/jboss/jboss-jakarta-jaxrs-api_spec with just pom like
you have seems reasonable. It's just a different way of getting the source,
and is analogous to what WildFly is doing with all our
ee-9/source-transform modules.
That's a good point. I hadn't thought about doing it from that repository.
In that case I do think it could be done. I could submit a PR to that
repository that does this.
On Thu, Mar 3, 2022 at 3:26 PM James Perkins <jperkins(a)redhat.com> wrote:
> I'm not sure if this is technically allowed, but this does seem to work
>
https://github.com/resteasy/resteasy/pull/3039. A pseudo fork so to
> speak.
>
> On Thu, Mar 3, 2022 at 11:44 AM James Perkins <jperkins(a)redhat.com>
> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Mar 3, 2022 at 9:39 AM Brian Stansberry <
>> brian.stansberry(a)redhat.com> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Thu, Mar 3, 2022 at 11:18 AM James Perkins <jperkins(a)redhat.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Oh sorry, my mistake :) I would guess
>>>>
https://github.com/jboss/jboss-jakarta-jaxrs-api_spec and each other
>>>> spec likely has one there with a few exceptions. If you need access to
the
>>>> repository just let me know.
>>>>
>>>> On Thu, Mar 3, 2022 at 9:12 AM Scott Stark <sstark(a)redhat.com>
wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Into which JBoss org are we forking these jakartaee and eclipse-ee4j
>>>>> repos is the question?
>>>>>
>>>>> On Mar 3, 2022 at 10:58:03 AM, James Perkins
<jperkins(a)redhat.com>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> For Jakarta REST it's
https://github.com/jakartaee/rest. If
>>>>>> everyone else agrees with doing this I'm happy to get a full
list together
>>>>>> for the ones in question. If we want to just test with one first
though I'm
>>>>>> happy to have RESTEasy be the tester.
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>> I added a column to
>>>
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1ql5hpsqs5ZjawErhyVQX8idigFfm0uZZx....
>>> Let's track data there. If people want write access please ping me with
the
>>> google account to use.
>>>
>>> I don't think we should do these unless the people driving our
>>> integration of a spec ask. We shouldn't spend time producing
forks/releases
>>> if there won't be much benefit.
>>>
>>
>> I guess "benefit" is somewhat relative. There is definitely a cost to
>> using the forked version. It requires the time to handle it and brings the
>> question of "how often do we rebase?". What RESTEasy is doing does
work.
>> However, as I said it's polluting the local repository of anyone that
>> builds RESTEasy's main branch.
>>
>> One option I've thought of, but haven't tested, was to see if there is a
>> way with the maven-scm-plugin and the org.codehaus.mojo plugin to create a
>> fork during the build. I can have a look at this as it seems easier at
>> least than fully forking a repository. We wouldn't deploy these artifacts
>> into Nexus, but they could at least be used for local testing without
>> polluting the local repository.
>>
>>
>>>
>>>
>>>>>> On Thu, Mar 3, 2022 at 8:54 AM Scott Stark
<sstark(a)redhat.com>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I can take it on since this impacts our getting WildFly
certified
>>>>>>> for EE10. What GitHub org would I use for these forked
repos?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> James R. Perkins
>>>> JBoss by Red Hat
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> wildfly-dev mailing list -- wildfly-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
>>>> To unsubscribe send an email to wildfly-dev-leave(a)lists.jboss.org
>>>> %(web_page_url)slistinfo%(cgiext)s/%(_internal_name)s
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Brian Stansberry
>>> Principal Architect, Red Hat JBoss EAP
>>> He/Him/His
>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> James R. Perkins
>> JBoss by Red Hat
>>
>
>
> --
> James R. Perkins
> JBoss by Red Hat
>
--
Brian Stansberry
Principal Architect, Red Hat JBoss EAP
He/Him/His
--
James R. Perkins
JBoss by Red Hat