[
https://issues.jboss.org/browse/ARQ-322?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.sy...
]
Dan Allen commented on ARQ-322:
-------------------------------
Ah, right, I should have guessed there was another issue based on the fact that we've
discussed it in the past. Thanks for the pointer.
As for XML vs JSON, I wonder which would be faster. I would imagine that the developer
would prefer speed over one less dependency, since parse speed affects every test
execution. I could see the extra dep as a problem if it had to be packaged, but in this
case it's purely for client-side usage.
Should we at least do an analysis of the speed? If so, I can open a separate issue.
Implement a GlassFish 3.1 managed container adapter
---------------------------------------------------
Key: ARQ-322
URL:
https://issues.jboss.org/browse/ARQ-322
Project: Arquillian
Issue Type: Feature Request
Components: GlassFish Containers
Affects Versions: glassfish_1.0.0.CR2
Reporter: Dan Allen
Assignee: Vineet Reynolds
To round out the GlassFish support, we need a managed container adapter (see the JBoss AS
managed container).
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators:
https://issues.jboss.org/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see:
http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira