Re: [Hawkular-dev] BTM or not BTM, that is the question
----- Original Message -----
What about:
Hawkular Application Analytics: hawkular-app-analytics (It's part of the APM)
The fact that it is part of the conceptual framework definition for APM, along with
Business Transactions, makes a more compelling case to use APM :)
I think it also means we could explore more of the analytics angle in the future. But if
we were to use the analytics name in the project title, it would be as limiting/misleading
as the BTM name has turned out to be.
Pavol
On Fri, May 27, 2016 at 1:01 PM, Thomas Segismont < tsegismo(a)redhat.com >
wrote:
2016-05-27 11:07 GMT+02:00 Gary Brown < gbrown(a)redhat.com > :
1) Is a component rename a good idea?
I believe so.
2) If so, any suggestions for a name, either some generic term that
encapsulates APM, DT and BTM - or alternatively a completely unrelated name
(but then it would not follow the pattern used by other Hawkular
components).
To me Hawkular APM would be good (in long and short form)
_______________________________________________
hawkular-dev mailing list
hawkular-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/hawkular-dev
_______________________________________________
hawkular-dev mailing list
hawkular-dev(a)lists.jboss.org
https://lists.jboss.org/mailman/listinfo/hawkular-dev