[Hibernate-JIRA] Created: (HHH-2341) ObjectNotFoundException on session.get() on non-existent object
by Timo Thomas (JIRA)
ObjectNotFoundException on session.get() on non-existent object
---------------------------------------------------------------
Key: HHH-2341
URL: http://opensource.atlassian.com/projects/hibernate/browse/HHH-2341
Project: Hibernate3
Type: Bug
Components: core
Versions: 3.2.1
Environment: HSQLDB 1.8.0
Reporter: Timo Thomas
Hibernate version:
3.2.1 GA (same for hibernate-annotations)
Mapping documents:
Parent.java (omitting package and some import declarations)
import javax.persistence.*;
@Entity
public class Parent {
public Integer id;
public Set<Child> children = new HashSet<Child>();
@Id
@GeneratedValue(strategy = GenerationType.AUTO)
public Integer getId() {
return id;
}
public void setId(Integer id) {
this.id = id;
}
@OneToMany(mappedBy = "parent", cascade = CascadeType.ALL)
public Set<Child> getChildren() {
return children;
}
public void setChildren(Set<Child> children) {
this.children = children;
}
}
Child.java (omitting package and some import declarations)
import javax.persistence.*;
@Entity
public class Child {
public Integer id;
public Parent parent;
@Id
@GeneratedValue(strategy = GenerationType.AUTO)
public Integer getId() {
return id;
}
public void setId(Integer id) {
this.id = id;
}
@ManyToOne(optional = false)
@JoinColumn(name = "parent_fk")
public Parent getParent() {
return parent;
}
public void setParent(Parent parent) {
this.parent = parent;
}
}
Code between sessionFactory.openSession() and session.close():
Transaction transaction = session.beginTransaction();
Parent parent = new Parent();
parent.setName("p1");
session.persist(parent);
assertNotNull(parent.getId());
Integer parentId = parent.getId();
Child child = new Child();
child.setName("c1");
child.setParent(parent);
parent.getChildren().add(child);
session.persist(parent);
assertNotNull(child.getId());
Integer childId = child.getId();
transaction.commit();
session.close();
///////////////////////////////////////////
session = sessionFactory.openSession();
transaction = session.beginTransaction();
parent = (Parent) session.load(Parent.class, parentId);
child = (Child) session.load(Child.class, childId);
// child = (Child) session.get(Child.class, childId);
session.delete(parent);
// session.flush(); // !! required if session&transaction is re-opened and child is obtained with load(), otherwise exception on next line - BUG ?
child = (Child) session.get(Child.class, childId);
Full stack trace of any exception that occurs:
org.hibernate.ObjectNotFoundException: No row with the given identifier exists: [model.Child#1]
at org.hibernate.impl.SessionFactoryImpl$1.handleEntityNotFound(SessionFactoryImpl.java:375)
at org.hibernate.event.def.DefaultLoadEventListener.returnNarrowedProxy(DefaultLoadEventListener.java:223)
at org.hibernate.event.def.DefaultLoadEventListener.proxyOrLoad(DefaultLoadEventListener.java:187)
at org.hibernate.event.def.DefaultLoadEventListener.onLoad(DefaultLoadEventListener.java:103)
at org.hibernate.impl.SessionImpl.fireLoad(SessionImpl.java:878)
at org.hibernate.impl.SessionImpl.get(SessionImpl.java:815)
at org.hibernate.impl.SessionImpl.get(SessionImpl.java:808)
at test.CascadeAnnotationTest.testBug(CascadeAnnotationTest.java:48)
at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method)
at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:39)
at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:25)
at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:585)
at junit.framework.TestCase.runTest(TestCase.java:164)
at junit.framework.TestCase.runBare(TestCase.java:130)
at junit.framework.TestResult$1.protect(TestResult.java:110)
at junit.framework.TestResult.runProtected(TestResult.java:128)
at junit.framework.TestResult.run(TestResult.java:113)
at junit.framework.TestCase.run(TestCase.java:120)
at junit.framework.TestSuite.runTest(TestSuite.java:228)
at junit.framework.TestSuite.run(TestSuite.java:223)
at org.junit.internal.runners.OldTestClassRunner.run(OldTestClassRunner.java:35)
at org.eclipse.jdt.internal.junit4.runner.JUnit4TestReference.run(JUnit4TestReference.java:38)
at org.eclipse.jdt.internal.junit.runner.TestExecution.run(TestExecution.java:38)
at org.eclipse.jdt.internal.junit.runner.RemoteTestRunner.runTests(RemoteTestRunner.java:460)
at org.eclipse.jdt.internal.junit.runner.RemoteTestRunner.runTests(RemoteTestRunner.java:673)
at org.eclipse.jdt.internal.junit.runner.RemoteTestRunner.run(RemoteTestRunner.java:386)
at org.eclipse.jdt.internal.junit.runner.RemoteTestRunner.main(RemoteTestRunner.java:196)
The generated SQL (show_sql=true):
Hibernate: insert into Parent (id, name) values (null, ?)
Hibernate: call identity()
Hibernate: insert into Child (id, name, parent_fk) values (null, ?, ?)
Hibernate: call identity()
Hibernate: select parent0_.id as id0_0_, parent0_.name as name0_0_ from Parent parent0_ where parent0_.id=?
Hibernate: select children0_.parent_fk as parent3_1_, children0_.id as id1_, children0_.id as id1_0_, children0_.name as name1_0_, children0_.parent_fk as parent3_1_0_ from Child children0_ where children0_.parent_fk=?
Why is this exception thrown under these circumstances? Am I using the API in an undocumented/disallowed way? If yes, where exactly?
The Hibernate API doc says, that Session.get() returns null if an object can't be found. No exception should be thrown.
However, Session.get() at the end of sample code does return null as expected, if either
a) Session.get() is used instead of load() some lines above (see commented line)
b) the transaction and the session is isn't closed or reopened, respectively
c) Session.flush() is called before the final call to Session.get()
I'd like to understand why Hibernate behaves like this, which I presume is erroneous. I'm a beginner in Hibernate, but I couldn't get any help in the forum.
Timo
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators:
http://opensource.atlassian.com/projects/hibernate/secure/Administrators....
-
For more information on JIRA, see:
http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
14 years, 6 months
[Hibernate-JIRA] Created: (HHH-3159) Oracle 11g - desupport of oracle.jdbc.driver
by D. S. (JIRA)
Oracle 11g - desupport of oracle.jdbc.driver
--------------------------------------------
Key: HHH-3159
URL: http://opensource.atlassian.com/projects/hibernate/browse/HHH-3159
Project: Hibernate3
Issue Type: Bug
Components: core
Affects Versions: 3.2.5
Environment: Hibernate 3.2.5GA, Oracle 11.1.0.6.0.
Reporter: D. S.
With Oracle 11g, the deprecated package oracle.jdbc.driver no longer exists and this causes issues with all OracleDialect classes making it impossible to use Hibernate.
This issue affects all of the following classes:
Oracle9iDialect.java
Oracle9Dialect.java
Oracle10gDialect.java
The line error in question is:
Class types = ReflectHelper.classForName("oracle.jdbc.driver.OracleTypes");
This simply needs to be changed to:
Class types = ReflectHelper.classForName("oracle.jdbc.OracleTypes");
>From the Oracle 11g readme.txt
"In Oracle JDBC release 9.0.1 customer use of the classes
in that package was deprecated. A new package, oracle.jdbc, was
introduced and customers were advised to begin using the
interfaces and classes defined in oracle.jdbc. In every release
since 9.0.1 we have encouraged customers to switch to oracle.jdbc
and stated that oracle.jdbc.driver would be desupported. The time
has come. Customer code that references oracle.jdbc.driver will
not compile and will not execute in this and future releases of
the Oracle JDBC drivers. Please use oracle.jdbc instead."
Thanks.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: http://opensource.atlassian.com/projects/hibernate/secure/Administrators....
-
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
14 years, 6 months
[Hibernate-JIRA] Created: (HHH-2575) Query results are mapped to object array incorrectly when there is column ambiguity and aliases are not used
by Mike Hoeffner (JIRA)
Query results are mapped to object array incorrectly when there is column ambiguity and aliases are not used
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Key: HHH-2575
URL: http://opensource.atlassian.com/projects/hibernate/browse/HHH-2575
Project: Hibernate3
Issue Type: Bug
Components: query-sql
Affects Versions: 3.2.2
Environment: Hibernate 3.2.2 + MySQL 5.0.22 + MySQL Connector/J 5.0.5. Reproduced with HSQLDB 1.8.0.7.
Reporter: Mike Hoeffner
Priority: Minor
Attachments: ResultsNotEffectedByAliasesTest.java
I had a SQL (not HQL) query that basically looked like this:
select a.name, a.seq, b.name, b.seq from foo a, foo b;
and I noticed that the results obtained through list() -> (Object[]) get(i) -> row[0], row[1], row[2], row[3]
did not correspond to what I saw when manually running the query without Hibernate involved. row[2] always had the same values as row[0] and row[3] always had the same values as row[1].
When I tried adding aliases so that it became:
select a.name as a_name, a.seq as a_seq, b.name as b_name, b.seq as b_seq from foo a, foo b;
then the results matched what I expected. So having aliases in the SQL modified the results that were returned even though I was looking up the value from each column by its index / position instead of by its name / alias.
Attached is a test case that will reproduce this.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: http://opensource.atlassian.com/projects/hibernate/secure/Administrators....
-
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
14 years, 6 months
[Hibernate-JIRA] Created: (HHH-2661) Second-level cache is used after Session.setCacheMode(CacheMode.IGNORE)
by Anders Wallgren (JIRA)
Second-level cache is used after Session.setCacheMode(CacheMode.IGNORE)
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Key: HHH-2661
URL: http://opensource.atlassian.com/projects/hibernate/browse/HHH-2661
Project: Hibernate3
Issue Type: Bug
Components: caching (L2)
Affects Versions: 3.2.4.sp1
Environment: Windows Vista
MySQL 5.0
Reporter: Anders Wallgren
I'm doing some bulk importing and want to disable the L2 cache, so I call Session.setCacheMode(CacheMode.IGNORE) before doing any work.
However, the entities I'm creating still end up in the cache. It seems that org.hibernate.action.CollectionAction isn't doing the correct check to determine when to cache -- it only check for the existence of a configured cache, but doesn't check whether caching is enabled in the session.
For example, from CollectionAction.beforeExecutions:
public final void beforeExecutions() throws CacheException {
// we need to obtain the lock before any actions are
// executed, since this may be an inverse="true"
// bidirectional association and it is one of the
// earlier entity actions which actually updates
// the database (this action is resposible for
// second-level cache invalidation only)
if ( persister.hasCache() ) {
final CacheKey ck = new CacheKey(
key,
persister.getKeyType(),
persister.getRole(),
session.getEntityMode(),
session.getFactory()
);
lock = persister.getCache().lock(ck, null);
}
}
Shouldn't "if ( persister.hasCache() )" be persistence.hasCache && getSession.getCacheMode.isPutEnabled(), or something along those lines?
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: http://opensource.atlassian.com/projects/hibernate/secure/Administrators....
-
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
14 years, 6 months
[Hibernate-JIRA] Created: (HHH-3278) JPA query does not work on Derby when more than one entity has a column named DATE
by Felipe Leme (JIRA)
JPA query does not work on Derby when more than one entity has a column named DATE
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Key: HHH-3278
URL: http://opensource.atlassian.com/projects/hibernate/browse/HHH-3278
Project: Hibernate3
Issue Type: Bug
Components: core
Affects Versions: 3.2.6
Environment: Hibernate 3.2.6, Hibernate Annotations 3.3.0, Hibernate Entity Manager 3.3.1, Derby 10.4.1.3
Reporter: Felipe Leme
I have a relationship that is more like this (sorry, didn't have time to provide a simpler scenario):
- MP has a field/column called date
- MPHistory also have the same field
- there is a 1-N relationship between MP -> MPHistory
- the relationship has a @OrderBy("date") clause
When Hibernate starts using H2, everything works fine. But if I use Derby, I get the following exception:
Caused by: java.sql.SQLException: Column name 'DATE' appears more than once in the result of the query expression.
The bad SQL is the following:
Hibernate: select distinct agententit0_.id as id1_0_, mps1_.id as id0_1_, history2_.id as id3_2_, agententit0_.connected as connected1_0_, agententit0_.jmx_name as jmx4_1_0_, agententit0_.status as status1_0_, agententit0_.host_id as host10_1_0_, agententit0_.host as host1_0_, agententit0_.local as local1_0_, agententit0_.port as port1_0_, agententit0_.type as type1_0_, mps1_.date as date0_1_, mps1_.name as name0_1_, mps1_.value as value0_1_, mps1_.frequency_type as frequency5_0_1_, mps1_.is_full_mode as is6_0_1_, mps1_.is_historical as is7_0_1_, mps1_.is_normal_mode as is8_0_1_, mps1_.tolerance as tolerance0_1_, mps1_.is_summary_mode as is10_0_1_, mps1_.value_class as value11_0_1_, mps1_.info_id as info12_0_1_, mps1_.obj_id as obj13_0__, mps1_.id as id0__, history2_.date as date3_2_, history2_.value as value3_2_, history2_.value_class as value4_3_2_, history2_.mp_id as mp5_1__, history2_.id as id1__ from ggs_objects agententit0_ left outer join mps mps1_ on agententit0_.id=mps1_.obj_id left outer join mps_history history2_ on mps1_.id=history2_.mp_id where agententit0_.type in (108, 8) order by date asc
More specifically, the final 'order by date asc' should be 'order by history2_.date asc'.
Doing some debugging, I found the problem at org.hibernate.sql.Template, method isFunctionOrKeyword (line 304), which returns:
"(".equals(nextToken) ||
KEYWORDS.contains(lcToken) ||
functionRegistry.hasFunction(lcToken) ||
dialect.getKeywords().contains(lcToken) ||
FUNCTION_KEYWORDS.contains(lcToken);
The 3rd check ( dialect.getKeywords().contains(lcToken) ) returns true for Derby, then the whole method returns true, which in turns does not prepend the "$PlaceHolder$ (history2_, in this case), in the query:
else if (
isIdentifier(token, dialect) &&
!isFunctionOrKeyword(lcToken, nextToken, dialect, functionRegistry) // <<<<< THIS IS THE ISSUE >>>>
) {
result.append(TEMPLATE)
.append('.')
.append( dialect.quote(token) );
}
For now, I just removed the @OrderBy from my query (it's not really important in my case), but it looks like the Template method logic is wrong in this case.
PS: I initially open the same ticket at JBoss' site (http://jira.jboss.org/jira/browse/HIBERNATE-95) - my mistake, I guess I should have opened it here instead...
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: http://opensource.atlassian.com/projects/hibernate/secure/Administrators....
-
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
14 years, 6 months
[Hibernate-JIRA] Created: (HHH-3576) out of memory
by sridhar (JIRA)
out of memory
-------------
Key: HHH-3576
URL: http://opensource.atlassian.com/projects/hibernate/browse/HHH-3576
Project: Hibernate Core
Issue Type: Bug
Components: core
Affects Versions: 3.2.2
Environment: windows 2003 Standard edition SP2
Reporter: sridhar
Attachments: hibernate.zip
Hibernate unable to use scrollable results and running out of memory for MS SQL Server 2005 and MySQL 5.0.
But it is working fine for Oracle 10G.
Problem Description:
===================
I have a table with 10 columns and one of them is blob field. this blob field contains binary information about 33KB.
I have 70,000 rows in database.
When I read the complete data using scrollable results implementation of hibernate, for Oracle 10G, the process completeed in 10 Seconds.
But when run the same program for MS SQL Server 2005 and MySQL 5.0 its running out of memory.
Steps to reproduc the problem:
=========================
I am enclosing the eclipse project. In the lib folder it contains the JDBC drivers for Oracle 10G, Mysql 5, MS SQL Server2005.
Remaing jar files will come with standard Springs distribution of 2.5.
import the project into eclipse.
Please configure the database details in jdbc.properties
now run the DBRead.java.
This will populate the 68828 records in the configured database and reads complete data from the database.
For MySQL and MS SQl Server it will give out of memory error while reading.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: http://opensource.atlassian.com/projects/hibernate/secure/Administrators....
-
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
14 years, 6 months
[Hibernate-JIRA] Created: (HHH-2668) Caching Fails with Composite-Ids Containing Nested, Complex Entities
by Juan Osuna (JIRA)
Caching Fails with Composite-Ids Containing Nested, Complex Entities
--------------------------------------------------------------------
Key: HHH-2668
URL: http://opensource.atlassian.com/projects/hibernate/browse/HHH-2668
Project: Hibernate3
Issue Type: Bug
Components: caching (L2)
Affects Versions: 3.2.4.sp1
Environment: Problem is independent of environment or platform and most likely exists in prior versions.
Reporter: Juan Osuna
Attachments: hibernate-caching-fix.zip
Description of Failing Test Case Scenario
Preconditions: An entity class is mapped that uses a composite-id that contains a nested entity class. Only the composite-id class implements equals/hashcode, not the nested entity class.
Steps to Reproduce:
1. open session and fetch object using composite-id
2. open new session and fetch same object again using different instance of composite-id but with same identity
Invalid Postconditions: On second retrieve, Hibernate fails to get the object from the cache and unnecessarily reloads the object. CachKeys containing different instances of the composite-id always fail to be equal even though they have the same persistent identity.
Attachment Contents
Code fix is attached as well as a Junit test case that reproduces the problem and validates the fix. The full Hibernate suite was also executed with no impact.
Attachment contains:
New Test Method:
org.hibernate.test.cache.BaseCacheProviderTestCase.testQueryCacheComplexItem
New Test Entity Items:
org\hibernate\test\cache\ComplexItem.hbm.xml
org.hibernate.test.cache.ComplexItem
org.hibernate.test.cache.ComplexItemPK
Code Fix:
org.hibernate.cache.CacheKey (see FIX comments)
Problem and Fix Details
Hibernate generally strives to use persistent identifiers for managing object identity rather than the equals/hashcode methods implemented by entity classes. While it is good practice to implement equals/hashcode, Hibernate does not generally force users to do this.
When wrapping a composite-id object, the current implementation of CacheKey fails to recurse through nested complex entities to query for equality based on persistent identity. Instead, when the recursion algorithm hits a complex entity, it invokes equals directly on that entity rather than further recursing through the identifier object.
Notably, the recursion logic for equals is not symmetrical with the recursion logic for hashcode, which does recurse through identifier objects. So, while CacheKey never invokes hashcode on nested complex entities, it does invoke equals on these entities.
A simple fix to this inconsistency is to store the factory parameter passed to CacheKey and later pass that parameter to the overloaded method:
Type.isEqual(Object x, Object y, EntityMode entityMode, SessionFactoryImplementor factory).
This fix restores symmetry to equals and hashcode behavior. By calling this overloaded method, the thread of execution will enter EntityType. isEqual(Object x, Object y, EntityMode entityMode, SessionFactoryImplementor factory), which correctly recurses through complex identifiers.
Design Principles
Hibernate should strive to behave predictably even in scenarios where users do not follow best practices.
Hibernate should strive to be as forgiving as possible as long there is no negative consequence caused by such forgiveness.
Hibernate should behave as consistently as possible. If Hibernate does not generally rely user-implemented equals/hashcode, it is best to avoid exceptions to this rule wherever possible.
Possible Future Enhancement
Mapping composite-ids that contain complex entities can cause deep object graphs to be cached as part of CacheKey. This is unsettling because of it's potential to consume memory unnecessarily and unpredictably.
Currently, CacheKey caches the hashcode by recursing through a complex graph of identifier objects. Perhaps, it would also be possible for CacheKey to cache an object graph of identifier objects whose leaves hold primitive values. This would further add symmetry between hashcode and equals and lighten the load for caching composite-ids that hold entity classes.
Robustly supporting composite-ids that hold complex identifiers seems like a worthwhile design goal.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: http://opensource.atlassian.com/projects/hibernate/secure/Administrators....
-
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
14 years, 6 months