[
http://opensource.atlassian.com/projects/hibernate/browse/HSEARCH-172?pag...
]
Emmanuel Bernard commented on HSEARCH-172:
------------------------------------------
I think you are sliding to a different subject which is mixing Lucene and SQL queries. As
you mentioned, this is not a generically fixable problem.
Back to the original subject, if you manage to get a small amount of elements from Lucene,
then I imagine sorting the data in memory (using Comparable) will be quite trivial and
fast. If you have a huge amount of data returned from the Lucene query, you're back to
the problem I described initially. That is the reason I still need to be convinced before
putting a double edge sword into people's hands
Add ability to do a Hibernate Sort rather then Lucene Sort
----------------------------------------------------------
Key: HSEARCH-172
URL:
http://opensource.atlassian.com/projects/hibernate/browse/HSEARCH-172
Project: Hibernate Search
Issue Type: Improvement
Components: engine
Reporter: Josh Atir
Priority: Minor
I have a case in which a Lucene sort would be much more expensive then a sql sort. I can
specify a sort order using Criteria, which causes the entity loading query to be sorted
correctly. The engine then ignores the order that was returned, and instead returns the
results based on the order it was received from Lucene.
I'd like the ability to specify a Hibernate sort rather then a Lucene sort.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators:
http://opensource.atlassian.com/projects/hibernate/secure/Administrators....
-
For more information on JIRA, see:
http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira