[hibernate-issues] [JIRA] (HHH-15629) Tolerate @XxxxToOne @JoinTable with no explicit join table name

Gavin King ( https://hibernate.atlassian.net/secure/ViewProfile.jspa?accountId=557058%... ) *created* an issue Hibernate ORM ( https://hibernate.atlassian.net/browse/HHH?atlOrigin=eyJpIjoiNjIxYzRhNmY2... ) / Bug ( https://hibernate.atlassian.net/browse/HHH-15629?atlOrigin=eyJpIjoiNjIxYz... ) HHH-15629 ( https://hibernate.atlassian.net/browse/HHH-15629?atlOrigin=eyJpIjoiNjIxYz... ) Tolerate @XxxxToOne @JoinTable with no explicit join table name ( https://hibernate.atlassian.net/browse/HHH-15629?atlOrigin=eyJpIjoiNjIxYz... ) Issue Type: Bug Affects Versions: 6.1.4 Assignee: Unassigned Created: 26/Oct/2022 00:49 AM Priority: Minor Reporter: Gavin King ( https://hibernate.atlassian.net/secure/ViewProfile.jspa?accountId=557058%... ) Hibernate will happily infer a name for a many-valued association with a @JoinTable with no name member, exactly as specified by JPA. But for some reason it apparently refuses to do this for a single-valued association. This seems inconsistent, and arguably even goes against the spec. It’s surely very easy to fix: just infer a name. The Javadoc and spec say: This is a bit ambiguous, being silent on the order of the table names! But I think we can extrapolate from sections 2.10.5.x that the rule is that the “owner” of the association comes first. (A @ManyToOne is always the owner.) ( https://hibernate.atlassian.net/browse/HHH-15629#add-comment?atlOrigin=ey... ) Add Comment ( https://hibernate.atlassian.net/browse/HHH-15629#add-comment?atlOrigin=ey... ) Get Jira notifications on your phone! Download the Jira Cloud app for Android ( https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.atlassian.android.jira.... ) or iOS ( https://itunes.apple.com/app/apple-store/id1006972087?pt=696495&ct=Em... ) This message was sent by Atlassian Jira (v1001.0.0-SNAPSHOT#100209- sha1:6031644 )