[
http://opensource.atlassian.com/projects/hibernate/browse/HHH-3608?page=c...
]
Ryan Klems commented on HHH-3608:
---------------------------------
Steve, I'm saying its fundamentally broken because if you hit the sequence twice, and
make any sort of assumption that there is any sort of cohesion between those selects _is_
fundamentally broken. It's called a race, which obviously many of us who have hit
this bug have encountered. Yes, you are correct that it was an assumption on my part that
it was getting the next values, not the previous values, however you have to make an
assumption about it one way or another... either you are getting the next set or the
previous set, and all systems using it must agree. Perhaps the most sense is to break
this into pre and post versions, but making 2 selects will only work when there is only
one thing hitting the database.
DB sequence numbers are not unique when using the pooled
SequenceStyleGenerator in multiple JVMs with the same DB
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Key: HHH-3608
URL:
http://opensource.atlassian.com/projects/hibernate/browse/HHH-3608
Project: Hibernate Core
Issue Type: Bug
Components: core
Affects Versions: 3.2.6, 3.3.0.GA, 3.3.0.SP1, 3.3.1
Environment: Hibernate 3.2.6, Oracle (any version)
Reporter: Matthias Gommeringer
Priority: Blocker
Attachments: CustomPooledOptimizer.java, PooledOptimizerTest.java
We have several Application Servers (=JVMs) running each of them using Hibernate-Objects
with the SequenceStyleGenerator+pooled configured. In unpredictable time intervals it
happens that hibernate assigns the same ID to two completely different objects which
results in a UniqueConstraintViolation exception from the database. Here an example with a
description where hibernate fails:
DB-Sequence setup:
start=0
increment=2
PooledOptimizer.generate() with 2 threads (first assignment of hiValue/value):
JVM-1 JVM-2
value=0=callback.nextval
value=2=callback.nextval
hiValue=4=callback.nextval
hiValue=6=callback.nextval
The problem's cause is in the PooledOptimizer.generate: when it initializes
the value+hiValue for the first time it invokes callback.nextValue() twice which
may provide values that do not belong to each other. The reason is that
between the assignment of "value" and "hiValue" another JVM can
retrieve a
DB sequence value from the callback which leads to an inconsistent "value" and
"hiValue"
relation (see example above).
A fix that works for multiple JVMs would be to invoke the
"callback.getNextValue()" maximum once
per "optimizer.generate()" call:
public synchronized Serializable generate(AccessCallback callback) {
if ( hiValue < 0 ) {
value = callback.getNextValue();
hiValue = value + incrementSize;
}
else if ( value >= hiValue ) {
value = callback.getNextValue();
hiValue = value + incrementSize;
}
return make(value++);
}
I attached a testcase that prooves the described problem (you can see that the IDs
"2" and "3" are assigned two times).
I would be very thankful if this problem could be fixed very soon since it is a
showstopper which
occurs very unpredictably.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators:
http://opensource.atlassian.com/projects/hibernate/secure/Administrators....
-
For more information on JIRA, see:
http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira