]
Chris Bredesen commented on HHH-2864:
-------------------------------------
Carl,
Attach the patch you created and let's see if we can't get it integrated.
Merging a detached instance with a new child in a unidirectional
one-to-many association fails if the parent was previously loaded as a proxy
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Key: HHH-2864
URL:
http://opensource.atlassian.com/projects/hibernate/browse/HHH-2864
Project: Hibernate3
Issue Type: Bug
Affects Versions: 3.1.3, 3.2.5
Environment: Tested with Hibernate 3.1.3 and 3.2.5 on HSQL and Oracle 9, using
JDK 1.4 and 1.6. The behavior is the same in each case.
Reporter: Carl-Eric Menzel
Attachments: ProxyMergeTest.zip
Given a class One and a class Many with a unidirectional one-to-many relationship.
I'm getting a PropertyValueException: "not-null property references a null or
transient value: test.Many._toManyBackref" when merging a detached "One"
instance which contains a new "Many" instance if and only if the "One"
was previously loaded as a proxy in the same transaction. The meat of the problem:
// create new One
One one = new One();
one.setOneOther(new One());
session.save(one);
commitAndGetNewSession();
/*
* load saved instance as a proxy, but do not use it. we could use get() so we
wouldn't get a proxy, but a real-world
* application might have only loaded this instance transitively as a proxy before
merging a detached instance, so this is a
* real problem.
*/
Object proxyWeDontUse = session.load(One.class, new Integer(one.getId()));
assertTrue(proxyWeDontUse instanceof HibernateProxy);
// use detached instance and add a Many
one.getToMany().add(new Many());
// merge the detached instance. this should work, but doesn't. the backref-getter
doesn't correctly
// find the parent object of the new Many, because the copyCache/mergeMap only
contains the proxy loaded
// above, but the entityEntries in PersistenceContext contain the raw unproxied
object.
session.merge(one);
In this simplified testcase I explicitly load the proxy. In our actual scenario, the One
is loaded transitively as a child of yet another parent object - usually as a proxy. We
need to load this to perform some authorization checks before we can actually merge the
incoming detached One instance. This leads to the situation of having the proxy first and
only then merging. As far as I understand the documentation, this *should* work.
I spent quite some time getting to the bottom of this - mostly debugging through the
MergeEventListener. I found this: DefaultMergeEventListener uses Session.get() to load the
persistent instance when merging a detached one. get() returns the proxy that was
previously created. DefaultMergeEventListener then stores this returned proxy as the value
of an entry in the copyCache. Later the backref-getter gets the actual persistent instance
from the PersistenceContext and uses this to look for the detached instance in the
mergeMap (which is the inverted copyCache, if I understood that correctly). But this only
returns null, since the only key it can see is the *proxy* that was put as a value into
the copyCache. Thus the backref-getter can't find its backref, leading to the
exception.
Proposed solution: Store the persistent instance in the copyCache instead of the proxy,
or do some dereferencing magic when looking for the backref. I can't judge that though
- all I know about this right now comes from several hours of serious debugging.
I'm attaching an almost ready-to-use testcase as a zipped Eclipse project. Sources
and config are in src/, the lib/ directory contains a hsqldb.jar which I used for fast
testing. Simply add the required Hibernate jars and run the
MergeUnidirectionalOneToManyTest. We currently use Hibernate 3.1.3 in production, but the
problem occurs with 3.2.5 as well. A patched 3.1 release would be the best for us, but
I'm not sure whether that is possible.
Thanks!
Carl-Eric Menzel
Senacor Technologies AG
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: