[
https://issues.jboss.org/browse/ISPN-9206?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin....
]
Sanne Grinovero commented on ISPN-9206:
---------------------------------------
But how do you know if there's a conflict?
Also, I wouldn't want to have advanced flags and options which are user's
responsibility to get right if we can't clearly explain when there's need. You
also need to ship a safe default, what would that be?
I agree with your hopes on not allowing "intentional stealing" by a _different_
deployment unit. We still need to make sure to guard about unintentional stealing though.
Handle long qualified region names more efficiently
---------------------------------------------------
Key: ISPN-9206
URL:
https://issues.jboss.org/browse/ISPN-9206
Project: Infinispan
Issue Type: Enhancement
Components: Hibernate Cache
Affects Versions: 9.2.2.Final, 9.3.0.Beta1
Reporter: Radim Vansa
Assignee: Radim Vansa
Hibernate region names are FQCNs, and when the prefix is added this can exceed the 255
byte ByteString limit. Also, it's inefficient to ship such long cache names with each
command.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.5.0#75005)