January 2017 - infinispan-issues - Jboss List Archives

[JBoss JIRA] (ISPN-5415) Expose protobuf entries to scripting

by Galder Zamarreño (JIRA)

[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/ISPN-5415?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.... ] Galder Zamarreño updated ISPN-5415: ----------------------------------- Fix Version/s: 9.0.0.Beta3 (was: 9.0.0.Beta2) > Expose protobuf entries to scripting > ------------------------------------ > > Key: ISPN-5415 > URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/ISPN-5415 > Project: Infinispan > Issue Type: Feature Request > Components: Remote Querying > Affects Versions: 8.0.0.Final > Reporter: Adrian Nistor > Assignee: Adrian Nistor > Fix For: 9.0.0.Beta3 > > > We need an alternative API for Protostream marshalling that is easy to consume from scripting languages. The messages need to be unmarshalled into a map-like object that can be accessed easily from scripting languages. No marshaller implementation code should be provided by users, also no annotations. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.2.3#72005)

7 years, 5 months

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss JIRA] (ISPN-5241) Cache topology updates should use the NO_FC flag

by Galder Zamarreño (JIRA)

[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/ISPN-5241?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.... ] Galder Zamarreño updated ISPN-5241: ----------------------------------- Fix Version/s: 9.0.0.Beta3 (was: 9.0.0.Beta2) > Cache topology updates should use the NO_FC flag > ------------------------------------------------ > > Key: ISPN-5241 > URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/ISPN-5241 > Project: Infinispan > Issue Type: Bug > Components: Core, State Transfer > Affects Versions: 7.1.0.Final > Reporter: Dan Berindei > Assignee: Dan Berindei > Priority: Critical > Fix For: 9.0.0.Beta3 > > > Topology updates are sent while holding the ClusterCacheStatus lock, so they should never block. However, when MFC is present, the topology update can block waiting for enough credits. As most CacheTopologyControlCommands need to acquire the ClusterCacheStatus lock, this can easily lead to a full remote-executor pool (and OOB pool) and the appearance of a deadlock. > What's more, if one node is not responsive, it can block all the other nodes from receiving further topology updates. Topology updates should be as prompt as possible, so we should use the NO_FC flag to ensure that each node receives topology updates as soon as possible. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.2.3#72005)

7 years, 5 months

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss JIRA] (ISPN-5470) Remote-executor threads should not block to acquire locks

by Galder Zamarreño (JIRA)

[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/ISPN-5470?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.... ] Galder Zamarreño updated ISPN-5470: ----------------------------------- Fix Version/s: 9.0.0.Beta3 (was: 9.0.0.Beta2) > Remote-executor threads should not block to acquire locks > --------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: ISPN-5470 > URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/ISPN-5470 > Project: Infinispan > Issue Type: Task > Components: Core > Affects Versions: 7.2.1.Final > Reporter: Dan Berindei > Fix For: 9.0.0.Beta3 > > > Currently, enabling the queue on the remote-executor thread pool can cause deadlocks, because a CommitCommand/1PCPrepareCommand could end up in the queue while a remote-executor thread is busy waiting to acquire the same lock that this commit would release. > If trying to acquire a lock would free the thread until the key has been acquired, we could enable the queue on the remote-executor/OOB thread pools, and we would need a lot less threads for the same load. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.2.3#72005)

7 years, 5 months

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss JIRA] (ISPN-5475) Narayana should be configured to use a volatile store by default

by Galder Zamarreño (JIRA)

[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/ISPN-5475?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.... ] Galder Zamarreño updated ISPN-5475: ----------------------------------- Fix Version/s: 9.0.0.Beta3 (was: 9.0.0.Beta2) > Narayana should be configured to use a volatile store by default > ---------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: ISPN-5475 > URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/ISPN-5475 > Project: Infinispan > Issue Type: Task > Components: Test Suite - Core > Affects Versions: 7.2.1.Final > Reporter: Dan Berindei > Assignee: Dan Berindei > Fix For: 9.0.0.Beta3 > > > The {{jbossts-properties.xml}} configuration file in the core module configures a file store by default, and tests have to call {{TestCacheManagerFactory.markAsTransactional()}} (or one of the methods that calls it) to configure a volatile store instead. > Furthermore, the {{jbossts-properties.xml}} file is explicitly filtered out of the core tests jar, so other modules can't use it. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.2.3#72005)

7 years, 5 months

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss JIRA] (ISPN-5476) Cross-site tests should run in parallel

by Galder Zamarreño (JIRA)

[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/ISPN-5476?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.... ] Galder Zamarreño updated ISPN-5476: ----------------------------------- Fix Version/s: 9.0.0.Beta3 (was: 9.0.0.Beta2) > Cross-site tests should run in parallel > --------------------------------------- > > Key: ISPN-5476 > URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/ISPN-5476 > Project: Infinispan > Issue Type: Task > Components: Core, Cross-Site Replication, Test Suite - Core > Affects Versions: 7.2.1.Final > Reporter: Dan Berindei > Fix For: 9.0.0.Beta3 > > > Currently the cross-site tests have to run in a single thread, and that means they're much slower than the regular core tests. > It also means they need to run with a separate Maven profile, and that (combined with their duration) makes it very unlikely for devs to run the xsite tests on their machines. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.2.3#72005)

7 years, 5 months

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss JIRA] (ISPN-5453) X-site state transfer: retry locally if local state push throws a SuspectException

by Galder Zamarreño (JIRA)

[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/ISPN-5453?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.... ] Galder Zamarreño updated ISPN-5453: ----------------------------------- Fix Version/s: 9.0.0.Beta3 (was: 9.0.0.Beta2) > X-site state transfer: retry locally if local state push throws a SuspectException > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: ISPN-5453 > URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/ISPN-5453 > Project: Infinispan > Issue Type: Bug > Components: Core, Cross-Site Replication > Affects Versions: 7.2.1.Final > Reporter: Dan Berindei > Priority: Minor > Fix For: 9.0.0.Beta3 > > > When the local state push command throws a {{SuspectException}}, we currently retry remotely unless the target node was already removed from the cache topology. This will fail with another {{SuspectException}}, so it would be better to retry locally the first time. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.2.3#72005)

7 years, 5 months

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss JIRA] (ISPN-5454) XSite: RetryMechanismTest random failures

by Galder Zamarreño (JIRA)

[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/ISPN-5454?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.... ] Galder Zamarreño updated ISPN-5454: ----------------------------------- Fix Version/s: 9.0.0.Beta3 (was: 9.0.0.Beta2) > XSite: RetryMechanismTest random failures > ----------------------------------------- > > Key: ISPN-5454 > URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/ISPN-5454 > Project: Infinispan > Issue Type: Bug > Components: Cross-Site Replication > Affects Versions: 7.2.1.Final > Reporter: Dan Berindei > Priority: Blocker > Labels: testsuite_stability > Fix For: 9.0.0.Beta3 > > > {{ClusteredCacheBackupReceiver.awaitRemoteTask()}} doesn't respect the state push command's timeout, at least when it's smaller than the sync replication timeout in the target cache. When that happens, the state provider will resend the state, and there will be 2 state push commands executing at the same time. > RetryMechanismTest changes the state push timeout to 2 seconds, but the sync replication timeout stays at 15 seconds. This causes failures in {{testRetryLocally}} and {{testFailRetryLocally}}, if it takes more than 2 seconds to suspect the killed node. > {noformat} > 10:02:13,007 TRACE (asyncTransportThread-8,NodeN:) [RetryOnFailureXSiteCommand] Sending XSiteStatePushCommand{cacheName=___defaultcache, timeout=2000 (1 keys)} to [NYC (sync, timeout=2000)] > 10:02:16,008 TRACE (asyncTransportThread-8,NodeN:) [RetryOnFailureXSiteCommand] Sending XSiteStatePushCommand{cacheName=___defaultcache, timeout=2000 (1 keys)} to [NYC (sync, timeout=2000)] > 10:02:16,040 TRACE (asyncTransportThread-4,NodeP:) [RpcManagerImpl] replication exception: > org.infinispan.remoting.transport.jgroups.SuspectException: Node NodeQ-56809 was suspected > 10:02:16,040 TRACE (asyncTransportThread-0,NodeP:) [RpcManagerImpl] replication exception: > org.infinispan.remoting.transport.jgroups.SuspectException: Node NodeQ-56809 was suspected > 10:02:19,147 ERROR (testng-RetryMechanismTest:) [UnitTestTestNGListener] Test testFailRetryLocally(org.infinispan.xsite.statetransfer.failures.RetryMechanismTest) failed. > java.lang.AssertionError: expected:<2> but was:<3> > at org.testng.AssertJUnit.fail(AssertJUnit.java:59) > at org.testng.AssertJUnit.failNotEquals(AssertJUnit.java:364) > at org.testng.AssertJUnit.assertEquals(AssertJUnit.java:80) > at org.testng.AssertJUnit.assertEquals(AssertJUnit.java:245) > at org.testng.AssertJUnit.assertEquals(AssertJUnit.java:252) > at org.infinispan.xsite.statetransfer.failures.RetryMechanismTest.testFailRetryLocally(RetryMechanismTest.java:227) > {noformat} -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.2.3#72005)

7 years, 5 months

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss JIRA] (ISPN-5515) Purge store if there is another node already running

by Galder Zamarreño (JIRA)

[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/ISPN-5515?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.... ] Galder Zamarreño updated ISPN-5515: ----------------------------------- Fix Version/s: 9.0.0.Beta3 (was: 9.0.0.Beta2) > Purge store if there is another node already running > ---------------------------------------------------- > > Key: ISPN-5515 > URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/ISPN-5515 > Project: Infinispan > Issue Type: Enhancement > Components: Core, Loaders and Stores > Affects Versions: 7.2.2.Final, 8.0.0.Alpha1 > Reporter: Dan Berindei > Assignee: Dan Berindei > Fix For: 9.0.0.Beta3 > > > Preloading happens before communicating with other nodes that might already have the cache running. When joining the existing members, the cache then waits to receive the first CH in which it is a member, and then deletes only the entries in the segments that it doesn't own in that CH. > The intention of this was to remove as little as possible from the existing data, e.g. if the first node to start up is not the one that was stopped last. But the preloaded entries are not replicated to the other nodes, so this can lead to inconsistencies. > It would be better to delay preloading until we know we are the first node to start up, but failing that we could clear the data container and the store before receiving the initial state. > Note that this will only allow preloading data from one node. Restoring data from more nodes is harder to do, and we will implement it as part of graceful restart. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.2.3#72005)

7 years, 5 months

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss JIRA] (ISPN-5499) SizeTest.testPersistentDistributedCacheSize random failures

by Galder Zamarreño (JIRA)

[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/ISPN-5499?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.... ] Galder Zamarreño updated ISPN-5499: ----------------------------------- Fix Version/s: 9.0.0.Beta3 (was: 9.0.0.Beta2) > SizeTest.testPersistentDistributedCacheSize random failures > ----------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: ISPN-5499 > URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/ISPN-5499 > Project: Infinispan > Issue Type: Bug > Components: Test Suite - Server > Affects Versions: 7.2.1.Final > Reporter: Dan Berindei > Priority: Blocker > Labels: testsuite_stability > Fix For: 9.0.0.Beta3 > > > {noformat} > 16:04:28,678 ERROR (testng-SizeTest:) [UnitTestTestNGListener] Test testPersistentDistributedCacheSize(org.infinispan.client.hotrod.SizeTest) failed. > java.lang.AssertionError: expected:<20> but was:<38> > at org.testng.AssertJUnit.fail(AssertJUnit.java:59) > at org.testng.AssertJUnit.failNotEquals(AssertJUnit.java:364) > at org.testng.AssertJUnit.assertEquals(AssertJUnit.java:80) > at org.testng.AssertJUnit.assertEquals(AssertJUnit.java:245) > at org.testng.AssertJUnit.assertEquals(AssertJUnit.java:252) > at org.infinispan.client.hotrod.SizeTest.testPersistentDistributedCacheSize(SizeTest.java:59) > {noformat} > I have been able to make the test fail reliably by replacing the assertion on line 57 with this: > {code} > for (int i = 0; i < SIZE; i++) { > assertEquals(SIZE, clients.get(0).getCache(cacheName).size()); > } > {code} -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.2.3#72005)

7 years, 5 months

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss JIRA] (ISPN-5510) Provide better Hot Rod client socket timeout and retry defaults

by Galder Zamarreño (JIRA)

[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/ISPN-5510?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.... ] Galder Zamarreño updated ISPN-5510: ----------------------------------- Fix Version/s: 9.0.0.Beta3 (was: 9.0.0.Beta2) > Provide better Hot Rod client socket timeout and retry defaults > --------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: ISPN-5510 > URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/ISPN-5510 > Project: Infinispan > Issue Type: Enhancement > Reporter: Galder Zamarreño > Assignee: Galder Zamarreño > Fix For: 9.0.0.Beta3 > > > The current defaults are: > * Socket timeout = 60 seconds > * Max retries = 10 > As a result of these defaults, if the server hangs an operation, it'd take 10 minutes (60 second timeout x 10 retries) for the operation to finally return an exception to the client, which is way too much. > So, these default value should change to be more aggressive: 30 second socket timeout and 3 max retries. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.2.3#72005)

7 years, 5 months

1
0
0 / 0

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

infinispan-issues January 2017