January 2017 - infinispan-issues - Jboss List Archives

[JBoss JIRA] (ISPN-3906) Do not place ProtobufValueWrapper instances in the cache

by Galder Zamarreño (JIRA)

[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/ISPN-3906?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.... ] Galder Zamarreño updated ISPN-3906: ----------------------------------- Fix Version/s: 9.0.0.Beta3 (was: 9.0.0.Beta2) > Do not place ProtobufValueWrapper instances in the cache > -------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: ISPN-3906 > URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/ISPN-3906 > Project: Infinispan > Issue Type: Task > Components: Embedded Querying > Affects Versions: 6.0.0.Final > Reporter: Adrian Nistor > Assignee: Adrian Nistor > Fix For: 9.0.0.Beta3 > > > ProtobufValueWrapper is only needed in order to provide a classbridge so we can integrate with Hibernate Search. Still, we should not need to wrap the protobuf encoded byte array put in the cache with this class. It should only be created as a temporary wrapper just before we feed the data to Hibernate Search. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.2.3#72005)

7 years, 5 months

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss JIRA] (ISPN-3835) Index Update command is processed before the registry listener is triggered

by Galder Zamarreño (JIRA)

[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/ISPN-3835?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.... ] Galder Zamarreño updated ISPN-3835: ----------------------------------- Fix Version/s: 9.0.0.Beta3 (was: 9.0.0.Beta2) > Index Update command is processed before the registry listener is triggered > --------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: ISPN-3835 > URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/ISPN-3835 > Project: Infinispan > Issue Type: Bug > Components: Embedded Querying > Affects Versions: 6.0.0.Final > Reporter: Sanne Grinovero > Assignee: Gustavo Fernandes > Priority: Critical > Labels: 64QueryBlockers > Fix For: 9.0.0.Beta3 > > > When using the InfinispanIndexManager backend the master node might receive an index update command about an index which it hasn't defined yet. > Index definitions are triggered by the type registry, which in turn is driven by the ClusterRegistry and an event listener on the ClusterRegistry. It looks like slaves are sending update requests before the master has processed the configuration event. > This leads to index update commands to be lost (with a stacktrace logged) -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.2.3#72005)

7 years, 5 months

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss JIRA] (ISPN-3918) Inconsistent view of the cache with putIfAbsent in a non-tx cache during state transfer

by Galder Zamarreño (JIRA)

[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/ISPN-3918?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.... ] Galder Zamarreño updated ISPN-3918: ----------------------------------- Fix Version/s: 9.0.0.Beta3 (was: 9.0.0.Beta2) > Inconsistent view of the cache with putIfAbsent in a non-tx cache during state transfer > --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: ISPN-3918 > URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/ISPN-3918 > Project: Infinispan > Issue Type: Bug > Components: Core, State Transfer > Affects Versions: 6.0.0.Final > Reporter: Dan Berindei > Labels: consistency > Fix For: 9.0.0.Beta3 > > Attachments: ntpiadjst.log.gz > > > In a non-tx cache, sometimes it's possible for a {{get(k)}} to return {{null}} even though a previous {{putIfAbsent(k, v)}} returned a non-null value and the only concurrent operations on the cache are concurrent putIfAbsent calls. > Say \[B, A, C] are the owners of k (C just joined) > 1. A starts a {{putIfAbsent(k, v1)}} command, sends it to B > 2. B forwards the command to A and C > 3. C writes {{k=v1}} > 4. C becomes the primary owner of k (owners are now \[C, A]) > 5. A/B see the new topology before committing and throw an outdatedTopologyException > 6. A retries the command, sends it to C > 7. C forwards the command to A, which writes {{k=v1}} > 8. C doesn't have to update the entry, returns null > If, between steps 3 and 7, another thread on A starts a {{putIfAbsent(k, v2)}} command, the command will fail and return {{v1}} (because the primary owner already has a value). However, a subsequent {{get(k)}} command will return {{null}}, because A is an owner and doesn't have the value. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.2.3#72005)

7 years, 5 months

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss JIRA] (ISPN-4159) DefaultTwoWayKey2StringMapper encodes objects to strings in a manner that is incompatible with string handling of some databases

by Galder Zamarreño (JIRA)

[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/ISPN-4159?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.... ] Galder Zamarreño updated ISPN-4159: ----------------------------------- Fix Version/s: 9.0.0.Beta3 (was: 9.0.0.Beta2) > DefaultTwoWayKey2StringMapper encodes objects to strings in a manner that is incompatible with string handling of some databases > -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: ISPN-4159 > URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/ISPN-4159 > Project: Infinispan > Issue Type: Bug > Components: Loaders and Stores > Affects Versions: 6.0.0.Final > Reporter: Adrian Nistor > Assignee: Adrian Nistor > Fix For: 9.0.0.Beta3 > > > DefaultTwoWayKey2StringMapper uses two neat tricks. > 1. it does not encode all supported types, it only encodes non-Strings. Strings are kept unmodified. > 2. it uses a special prefix (unicode char 0xfeff) to mark which strings were encoded and which are plain. > Unfortunately some databases, notably MySql, interpret the endianness mark (0xfeff, 0xfffe), convert to native byte order and then drop it. > This leaves us with no clue the string is not an actual String but an encoded representation of another type. This misinterpretation leads later to ClassCastExceptions in various places in core and user code. > Proposed fix: get rid of #1 and #2 optimisations. Encode all objects, including Strings and always use the ?n prefix (where n stands for the original type). Drop the 0xFEFF marker prefix. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.2.3#72005)

7 years, 5 months

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss JIRA] (ISPN-4286) Two concurrent putIfAbsent operations can both return null during rebalance

by Galder Zamarreño (JIRA)

[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/ISPN-4286?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.... ] Galder Zamarreño updated ISPN-4286: ----------------------------------- Fix Version/s: 9.0.0.Beta3 (was: 9.0.0.Beta2) > Two concurrent putIfAbsent operations can both return null during rebalance > --------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: ISPN-4286 > URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/ISPN-4286 > Project: Infinispan > Issue Type: Bug > Components: Core, State Transfer > Affects Versions: 6.0.2.Final > Reporter: Dan Berindei > Assignee: Dan Berindei > Priority: Critical > Labels: consistency > Fix For: 9.0.0.Beta3 > > > If the cache topology changes while executing a putIfAbsent operation, the old primary owner will throw an OutdatedTopologyException, and the originator will retry on the new owner. > When retrying the PutKeyValueCommand on the new primary owner, we compare the current value with the command's new value. If they are equal, we assume that the initial command wrote the old value, and we return {{null}}. > However, the value might have been written by another putIfAbsent operation. So we could have two {{putIfAbsent(k, v)}} operations, both returning {{null}}. > {code} > A is the originator, B is the primary owner, k = null > A -> B: putIfAbsent(k, v1) > B dies before writing v, C is now primary owner > D -> C: putIfAbsent(k, v1) // another put operation from D, with the same value > C -> D: null // correct > A -> C: retry_putIfAbsent(k, v1) > C -> A: null // C assumes A is overwriting its own value, so it's also returning null > {code} -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.2.3#72005)

7 years, 5 months

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss JIRA] (ISPN-4340) Automatically setup shared indexes when indexing is enabled

by Galder Zamarreño (JIRA)

[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/ISPN-4340?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.... ] Galder Zamarreño updated ISPN-4340: ----------------------------------- Fix Version/s: 9.0.0.Beta3 (was: 9.0.0.Beta2) > Automatically setup shared indexes when indexing is enabled > ----------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: ISPN-4340 > URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/ISPN-4340 > Project: Infinispan > Issue Type: Feature Request > Components: Embedded Querying > Reporter: Sanne Grinovero > Assignee: Gustavo Fernandes > Labels: 64QueryBlockers > Fix For: 9.0.0.Beta3 > > > - on replicated Caches, we should create a default index on a FSDirectory and provide some appropriate default tuning, for example enabling NRT. > - distributed Caches will need the Infinispan Directory (shared) and a master/slave backend (Infinispan IndexManager, while NRT is not compatible in this case) > We want to keep the properties configuration structure as well as an "advanced tuning" and override capabilities of the default choices. > Some more common options like sync/async indexing should probably be promoted to be controlled by the XML elements and configuration DSL excplicitly. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.2.3#72005)

7 years, 5 months

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss JIRA] (ISPN-4817) Cluster Listener replication of listener to remote dist nodes needs privilege action

by Galder Zamarreño (JIRA)

[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/ISPN-4817?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.... ] Galder Zamarreño updated ISPN-4817: ----------------------------------- Fix Version/s: 9.0.0.Beta3 (was: 9.0.0.Beta2) > Cluster Listener replication of listener to remote dist nodes needs privilege action > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > Key: ISPN-4817 > URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/ISPN-4817 > Project: Infinispan > Issue Type: Bug > Components: Loaders and Stores > Affects Versions: 7.0.0.CR1 > Reporter: William Burns > Priority: Critical > Fix For: 9.0.0.Beta3 > > > The ClusterListenerReplicateCallable needs to add the listener in a privileged block so that it can work properly. > I was also thinking if we need to change all of our messages to send along the current Subject so it can be properly applied to remote invocations as well. In this case we wouldn't need to wrap the listener invocation. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.2.3#72005)

7 years, 5 months

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss JIRA] (ISPN-4624) Allow custom partition handling strategy

by Galder Zamarreño (JIRA)

[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/ISPN-4624?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.... ] Galder Zamarreño updated ISPN-4624: ----------------------------------- Fix Version/s: 9.0.0.Beta3 (was: 9.0.0.Beta2) > Allow custom partition handling strategy > ---------------------------------------- > > Key: ISPN-4624 > URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/ISPN-4624 > Project: Infinispan > Issue Type: Feature Request > Components: Core > Affects Versions: 7.0.0.Beta1 > Reporter: Dan Berindei > Labels: partition_handling > Fix For: 9.0.0.Beta3 > > > Users should be able to configure a custom PartitionHandlingStrategy. It should be able to specify a behaviour on merge as well. > We might want to merge this with the RebalancePolicy, which was also supposed to be configurable. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.2.3#72005)

7 years, 5 months

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss JIRA] (ISPN-4596) Avoid index cleanup operations on putIfAbsent

by Galder Zamarreño (JIRA)

[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/ISPN-4596?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.... ] Galder Zamarreño updated ISPN-4596: ----------------------------------- Fix Version/s: 9.0.0.Beta3 (was: 9.0.0.Beta2) > Avoid index cleanup operations on putIfAbsent > --------------------------------------------- > > Key: ISPN-4596 > URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/ISPN-4596 > Project: Infinispan > Issue Type: Enhancement > Components: Embedded Querying > Reporter: Sanne Grinovero > Assignee: Gustavo Fernandes > Fix For: 9.0.0.Beta3 > > > when doing a putIfAbsent() operation we can relax some of the internal cleanup operations, such as automatically enabling the Flag.SKIP_INDEX_CLEANUP -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.2.3#72005)

7 years, 5 months

1
0
0 / 0

[JBoss JIRA] (ISPN-4584) Stricter validation of cache configurations for distributed indexes

by Galder Zamarreño (JIRA)

[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/ISPN-4584?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.... ] Galder Zamarreño updated ISPN-4584: ----------------------------------- Fix Version/s: 9.0.0.Beta3 (was: 9.0.0.Beta2) > Stricter validation of cache configurations for distributed indexes > ------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: ISPN-4584 > URL: https://issues.jboss.org/browse/ISPN-4584 > Project: Infinispan > Issue Type: Enhancement > Components: Lucene Directory > Reporter: Sanne Grinovero > Assignee: Gustavo Fernandes > Fix For: 9.0.0.Beta3 > > > See also ISPN-4577 : it should not be allowed to configure a distributed metadata cache while the chunks cache is using local mode. > Ideally think of additional strict checks which we should apply.. suggestions? > Mitigated by ISPN-4340 -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v7.2.3#72005)

7 years, 5 months

1
0
0 / 0

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

infinispan-issues January 2017