]
Mircea Markus reassigned ISPN-604:
----------------------------------
Assignee: Mircea Markus (was: Trustin Lee)
Re-design CacheStore transactions
----------------------------------
Key: ISPN-604
URL:
https://issues.jboss.org/browse/ISPN-604
Project: Infinispan
Issue Type: Feature Request
Components: Loaders and Stores, Transactions
Affects Versions: 4.0.0.Final, 4.1.0.CR2
Reporter: Mircea Markus
Assignee: Mircea Markus
Fix For: 5.0.0.Final
Current(4.1.x) transaction implementation in CacheStores is brocken in several ways:
1st problem.
- AbstractCacheStore.prepare:
public void prepare(List<? extends Modification> mods, GlobalTransaction tx,
boolean isOnePhase) throws CacheLoaderException {
if (isOnePhase) {
applyModifications(mods);
} else {
transactions.put(tx, mods);
}
}
If this is 1PC we apply the modifications in the prepare phase - we should do it in the
commit phase (as JTA does it).
2nd problem.
This currently exhibits during commit/rollback with JdbcXyzCacheStore, but it is rather a
more general cache store issue.
When using a TransactionManager, during TM.commit AbstractCacheStore.commit is being
called internally which tries to apply all the modifications that happened during that
transaction.
Within the scope of AbstractCacheStore.commit, JdbcStore obtains a connection from a
DataSource and tries to write the modifications on that connection.
Now if the DataSource is managed (e.g. by an A.S.) on the DS.getConnection call the A.S.
would try to enlist the connection with the ongoing transaction by calling
Transaction.enlistResource(XAResource xaRes) [1]
This method fails with an IllegalStateException, because the transaction's status is
preparing (see javax.transaction.Transaction.enlistResource).
Suggested fix:
- the modifications should be registered to the transaction as they happen(vs. during
prepare/commit as it happens now)
- this requires API changes in CacheStore, e.g.
void store(InternalCacheEntry entry)
should become
void store(InternalCacheEntry entry, GlobalTransaction gtx)
(gtx would be null if this is not a transactional call).
[1] This behavior is specified by the JDBC 2.0 Standard Extension API, chapter 7 -
distributed transaction
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
For more information on JIRA, see: