[
https://issues.jboss.org/browse/ISPN-1115?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin....
]
Galder Zamarreño commented on ISPN-1115:
----------------------------------------
Just thinking out loud, haven't read the design preview email on the dev list: Does
the method need to be in the Cache? Couldn't the method be in a particular component
which AtomicHashMapProxy gets injected?
Fine-grained AtomicMaps
-----------------------
Key: ISPN-1115
URL:
https://issues.jboss.org/browse/ISPN-1115
Project: Infinispan
Issue Type: Feature Request
Components: Core API
Reporter: Manik Surtani
Assignee: Vladimir Blagojevic
Priority: Blocker
Fix For: 5.1.0.BETA2, 5.1.0.FINAL
Atomic Maps are locked by acquiring a single lock on the entire map and this causes
concurrency issues for certain use cases. This JIRA is to allow for concurrent
modifications of keys within the AtomicMap, provided the keys do not overlap.
The design is as follows:
* {{AtomicMapLookup}} gets a WL on the {{AtomicMap}}'s key (AMK) when creating and
removing a new AtomicMap
* Modifications to the AtomicMap (which go through the {{AtomicMapProxy}}) do _not_
acquire a WL on AMK. Instead,
* {{AdvancedCache}} exposes a new API, {{applyDelta(K deltaAwareValueKey, Delta delta,
Object... locksToAcquire)}}
* {{AtomicMapProxy}} makes changes by calling {{applyDelta}} and passing in the key
within the map that is being modified, along with the delta to apply.
* The implementation could offer lock pooling to prevent a large number of locks being
created for AtomicMaps with a large number of entries
* On detecting concurrent deletion, updates would fail.
This can then be used by other {{Delta}}/{{DeltaAware}} types in future as well, perhaps
JSON documents, etc.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators:
https://issues.jboss.org/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see:
http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira