[
https://issues.jboss.org/browse/ISPN-1065?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin....
]
Pete Muir commented on ISPN-1065:
---------------------------------
I think we should strongly consider writing a Stax parser by hand. Previous experience
tells me that this will result in a much more elegant architecture for our code (much
simpler to keep up to date as a result) and will perform much better. I would also propose
using a tool to read the docs from the schema and create a config doc, meaning all that
needs keeping up to date is the schema and parser.
Use a better mechanism to parse config files
--------------------------------------------
Key: ISPN-1065
URL:
https://issues.jboss.org/browse/ISPN-1065
Project: Infinispan
Issue Type: Enhancement
Components: Configuration
Affects Versions: 4.2.1.FINAL
Reporter: Manik Surtani
Assignee: Vladimir Blagojevic
Labels: jaxb
Fix For: 5.1.0.BETA1, 5.1.0.Final
The current codebase heavily relies on JAXB to:
1. Generate a XSD schema from a Configuration bean
2. Generate a parser to use with an XML configuration
This is known to be slow, and can significantly add to start up time:
{quote}
We did some analysis of our AS6 descriptor code which was using JAXB (800ms), compared to
straight stax (10ms)
{quote}
A possible solution could be to still use JAXB to generate the schema, but to also write
a Maven plugin which would generate a STAX parser based on the XSD schema and
Configuration bean at build time. Infinispan would then use this STAX parser rather than
a JAXB generated parser, which would be a lot faster.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
For more information on JIRA, see:
http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira