[infinispan-issues] [JBoss JIRA] (ISPN-4979) CacheStatusResponse map uses too much memory

[ https://issues.jboss.org/browse/ISPN-4979?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.... ] Dan Berindei commented on ISPN-4979: ------------------------------------ [~sannegrinovero], replacing all address collections with masks over Views was always going to be a challenge because not all members have all the views. E.g. a joiner might receive an old message referencing a view that it doesn't know about. It has become even trickier with partition handling, because we now have to track both nodes that are in the current consistent hash but not in the current JGroups view, and at the same time nodes that are in the current JGroups view but not in the JGroups view in which the CH was created. [~william.burns], I didn't expect to reuse addresses (or anything else) across different CacheStatusResponse instances. But since we're talking about 300 nodes x 3000 caches (potentially), I think the savings from intra-CSR reuse would be big enough. In fact, my first thought was to reuse the address just inside a {{DefaultConsistentHash}}, writing the members list first and referencing the members via their indices in the other collections. I have one small concern about your approach, as the additional {{ThreadLocal}} and {{IdentityHashMap}} accesses might slow down the more more common case of having just one address in the command. E.g. in a PrepareCommand, it's just the address of the originator in the {{GlobalTransaction}} object. Since the number of addresses is quite limited and doesn't change from cache to cache (or even from manager to manager, with FORK), I guess we could also add a static map in {{JGroupsAddress}}, limited to {{$\{jgroups.uuid_cache.max_elements\}}} entries (similar to JGroups' UUID cache), and keeping the wire format as it is. If necessary, we could try reusing the entire CH across CSRs. But that might be easier to do with a {{ResponseFilter}} in the {{GET_STATUS}} invocation, again keeping the wire format as it is. -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.3.8#6338)